Evaluation of Some Physical Properties of Sixteen Iranian Indigenous Barberry Genotypes

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M. Khodabandeh ¹
• M. Azizi ¹
• A. Balandary ²
• H. Arouiee ³

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Department of Food Safety and Quality Control, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology, Mashhad, Iran

³ Department of Horticultural Science and Landscape Architecture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.22067/jhs.2021.58409.0

Abstract

Introduction
Barberries are a broad class of spiny evergreen or deciduous shrubs belonging to the Berberidaceae family. They are of great importance due to their different parts' nutritional and medicinal properties and their ornamental applications. Genus Berberis, the biggest genus in Berberidaceae, includes more than 660 species. Barberry grows in Asia and Europe and has been used extensively as a medicinal plant in traditional medicine. In Iranian traditional medicine, several properties, such as antibacterial, antipyretic, antipruritic and antiarrhythmic, have been reported with unknown mechanisms of action. Incredible structural diversity among barberries' active components makes them a valuable source of novel therapeutic compounds. Seedless barberry (Berberis integerrima 'Asperma') is one of Iran's valuable indigenous medicinal plants. Common asexual propagation of this plant over the years and consequently low genetic diversity in populations of the seedless barberry restricts selection outcomes in breeding programs. Utilizing the indigenous wild genotypes of the barberry genus, which are easily able to cross-pollinate, is one of the best methods to increase genetic diversity. Accordingly, several wild seedy barberry genotypes were identified from all over Iran, collected and established in a collection in Mashhad; then, 16 genotypes were selected and their physical properties were studied. 
Materials and Methods
In this study, ripe fruits of sixteen unique genotypes (i.e., Iranian seedless barberry and fifteen seedy genotypes) were harvested in October- November 2015 and kept in a refrigerator in order to measure some of their physical properties in fresh fruits (berry dimension, 100-berry weight, juice content and color indices). For other properties, fruits were dried at room temperature. Fruit cluster length was measured by means of a ruler, the number of berries/cluster and the number of set/aborted seeds in berry by counting, berry dimensions by a digital caliper, weight of fresh and dried 100-berry, percentage of pulp and seed as well as fruit juice content by a scale with 0.001 accuracy. Moisture content was determined using an oven with 75 ºC temperature for 48 hours. Color indices, including L*, a* and b*, were measured using a portable colorimeter (Konica Minolta Chroma Meters CR-410). This study was performed using a completely randomized design with three replications. Data were analyzed by Minitab software version 16 using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and differences among means were determined for significance at p<0.05 using the Bonferroni test.
Results and Discussion
The results indicated significant differences among genotypes. Based on the results, cluster length ranged between 1.67cm (code 5-3) and 6.29 cm (code 10-1); moisture content was between 8.20% and 11.84% in genotypes 8-3 and 13-2, respectively. The fruit juice content range of the studied genotypes was between 51.22% and 71.87%. Genotype 2-1 had the highest dimension values and the highest 100-berry fresh weight (30.72g) and dry weight (10.00g) fruits. The lowest weights of 100-berry were related to 14-1 and seedless barberry. Genotypes 5-2 had the highest pulp percentage (98.17%) and the lowest seed percentage (1.50%) and 10-1 had the lowest pulp percentage (51.93%) and the highest seed percentage (48.07%). The highest number of set seeds (1.73) and the lowest number of aborted seeds (zero) were found in (10-1) and (14-2), respectively. Based on the results, seedless barberry had the lowest number of set seeds (0.00) and the highest number of aborted seeds (3.27). Regarding fruit color indices, genotypes showed significant variability from orange to brown and dark blue. Color indices L*, a* and b* ranged (from 22.83 to 38.13), (2.31 to 37.76) and (1.18 to 2.28), respectively.   
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that all genotypes have considerable variability in fruit traits (color, fruit dimensions, pulp/seed percentage, moisture content, etc.). Based on the result of this study, genotype 5-2 was the most similar genotype to seedless barberry. The seedless barberry populations have low genetic diversity due to asexual propagation through suckers over many years. Indigenous genotypes can be a valuable genetic resource for future breeding programs to improve the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of seedless barberry and introduce new cultivars of seedless barberry with different colors and consequently different nutritional- medicinal properties.

Keywords

• Barberry diversity
• Medicinal shrub
• Seedless barberry
• Seedy barberry
• Small fruit

20.1001.1.20084730.1401.36.3.1.2

Main Subjects

• Medicinal Plants

---

References

1- Akbulut, M., Coklar, H., Calisir, S., & Marakoglu, T. (2009). Some physico-mechanical and nutritional properties of barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits. Journal of Food Process Engineering 32: 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00229.x.

2- Talebi, S., Alizade, M., Ramezanpour, S. S., & Ghasemnejad, A. (2020). Study of morphological characteristics of different Berberis spp. genotypes in northeast of Iran. Journal of Plant Production Research 27(1): 75-91. (In Persian). https://dx.doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2020.15524.2396.

3- Alizadeh-Sani, M., Tavassoli, M., Mohammadian, E., Ehsani, A., Khaniki, G. J., Priyadarshi, R., & Rhim, J. W. (2021). pH-responsive color indicator films based on methylcellulose/chitosan nanofiber and barberry anthocyanins for real-time monitoring of meat freshness. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 166: 741-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.231.

4- Alemardan, A., Asadi, W., Rezaei, M., Tabrizi, L., & Mohammadi, S. (2013). Cultivation of Iranian seedless barberry (Berberis integerrima ‘Bidaneh’): A medicinal shrub. Industrial Crops and Products 50: 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.061.

5- Fallahi, J., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., & Nassiri Mohalati, M. (2010). Effect of harvesting date on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of seedless barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruit. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(2): 225-234. (In Persian)

6- Farhadi, C.M., Varidi, M., Varidi, M.J., & Shahidi, F. (2014). Evaluation of physical and chemical characteristics of three Iranian barberry species. Journal of Food Research (Agricultural Science) 24(1): 63-75. (In Persian)

7- Farhadi, C.M., & Varidi, M. (2012). Investigation of some physicochemical properties of black barberry. National Conference of Natural Products and Medicinal Plants, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 3-4 Oct. 2012. Bojnord, Iran. (In Persian)

8- Fathollahztadeh, H., Mobli, H., Jafari, A., Rajabipour, A., Ahmadi, H., & Mohammad Borghei, A. (2008). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of barberry. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Science 3(5): 789-794.

9- Gorjian, Sh., Tavakkoli, T., Khoshtaghaza, M.H., & Nikbakht, A.M. (2011). Drying kinetics and quality of barberry in a thin layer dryer. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 13: 303-314.

10- Kremer, D., Jurišić Grubješić, R., Popović, Z., & Karlović, K. (2012). Fruit and seed traits of Berberis croatica Horvat and Berberis vulgaris L. Acta Botanica Croatica 71(1): 115-123.

11- Balandari, A. (2002). The importance and historical background of barberry. p. 19-35. In M. Kafi et al. (ed.) Berberis, Production and Processing. Part 1. 1^st ed. Zaban va Adab. Mashhad. (In Persian)

12- Meteorological data bank of Iran hydrology website available at http://www.iranhydrology.net/meteo.asp (visited 14 November 2016).

13- Moosazadeh, R., Shoor, M., Davarinezhad, Gh., & Mokhtaryan, A. (2013). Identity of some grape cultivars based on fruits and their seeds morphological characteristic. Journal of Plant Environmental Physiology 7,4(28): 1-9. (In Persian)

14- Nazaripur, Z., Haghighi, S., Jalilian tabar, F., & Nejat lorestani, A. (2011). Investigation of some physical properties of barberry. 2^nd Annual scientific congress of Razi University, 11-14 Dec. 2011. Kermanshah, Iran. (In Persian)

15- Pirkhezri, M. (2022). Investigation of Genetic Diversity of Some Wild Barberry Genotypes (Berberis spp.) in Alborz and Tehran Provinces Using Morpho-pomological Markers. Journal of Horticultural Science 36(1): 177-191. (In Persian)

16- Statistical data of the synoptic stations of Iran, Climatology Research Institute. Available at http://cri.ac.ir/files/Data/Synoptic%20Data%20up%20to%20l2005/MASHHAD (visited 14 November 2016).

17- Tavakoli, K.I., Nakhaei, F., Mosavi, S., & Seghatoleslami, M. (2021). Variations in phytochemical properties of seedy barberry Berberis integerrima L. grown in different habitats of Kerman. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology 11(4): 3779-3788.

18- Velayati, E., Emadi, B., Khojastehpour, M., & Saidirad, M.H. (2011). The effect of moisture content on physical properties of Berberis. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Engineering 1(1): 1-9. (In Persian)

19- Yildiz, H., Ercisli, S., Sengul, M., Topdas, E.F., Beyhan, O., Cakir, O., Narmanlioglu, H.K., & Orhan, E. (2014). Some physicochemical characteristics, bioactive content and antioxidant characteristics of non-sprayed barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits from Turkey. Erwerbs- Obstbau 56(4): 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-014-0216-4.

20- Zarei, M., & Azizi, M. (2010). Evaluation of some physicochemical characteristics of six Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars fruit at ripening stage. Journal of Horticulture 24(2): 175-183. (In Persian)