Response of Yield and Yield Components of Table Grape cv., Yaghooti (Vitis vinifera L.) to Deficit Irrigation at Different Growth Stages

Document Type : Research Article

Author

• M. Fazeli Rostampour

Horticultural Crops Research Department, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran

10.22067/jhs.2025.90206.1382

Abstract

Introduction
Yaghooti grape is the oldest grape variety in Iran and is the most important horticultural product in the Sistan region, which is cultivated in more than 90% of the vineyards of this region. The issue of water scarcity in Sistan has become a serious threat to grape production in recent years, forcing local grape growers to manage this problem by reducing the volume and frequency of irrigation. Proper irrigation management, which involves determining the optimal timing and the required amount of irrigation for grapevines, is of particular importance. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate the physiological response of Yaghooti grapes to lack of water in different stages of growth in order to achieve the highest yield and also increase the production and income of gardeners in Sistan region.
 
Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted as strip-split plot design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Zahak Research Station from 2019 to 2023. The experimental treatments included an irrigation regime of control (full irrigation), irrigation after 35% soil moisture deficiency, and irrigation after 70% soil moisture deficiency. These treatments were applied to horizontal plots and while the irrigation stages including from bud burst to flowering, from flowering to fruit color change, from berry color variation to harvest, and  from harvest to leaf fall, were assigned to vertical plots. The traits including the relative leaf water content, leaf area, proline, soluble sugars, relative permeability of leaf cell membrane, canopy temperature and chlorophyll index were measured one week before flowering, cluster color change, fruit harvest and leaf color change. The row spacing was three meters, and the vine spacing within rows was two meters. Irrigation scheduling was determined based on the treatments using a TDR moisture meter. After full maturity (uniform ruby ​​color of the cluster with a Brix above 17), the trait of cluster length was measured using a ruler and the cluster width and berry diameter were measured using a caliper. The traits of cluster number and number of berries per cluster were counted and cluster axis weight (average weight of three cluster axes per plant), fresh berry weight (average weight of 10 berries per cluster), cluster weight (average weight of four clusters per plant) and yield (average yield of three plants per plot) were measured using an OHAUS digital scale with an accuracy of 0.01 g (Gatti et al., 2012). For statistical analysis, after ensuring the normality of the data, analysis of variance was performed using SAS software version 9.4 and using the GLM procedure. Composite variance analysis related to the three years was performed when the Bartlett test confirmed the homogeneity of variances.
 
Results and Discussion
Deficit irrigation resulted in a reduction in cluster rachis weight, cluster length, cluster width, number of berries per cluster, berry diameter, berry weight, cluster weight, number of clusters per vine, and fruit yield, along with an increased rate of yield reduction. Reducing the water availability for grapevines led to a decrease in the traits affecting fruit yield. This reduction varied for each trait depending on the specific stage of deficit irrigation. For all traits, deficit irrigation applied during the flowering to veraison stage was the most sensitive to irrigation reduction. The highest (6500 kg) and lowest (1111 kg) fruit yields were obtained under full irrigation and irrigation after 70% depletion of available water during the flowering to veraison stage, respectively. The highest fruit yield under deficit irrigation was observed during the fruit harvest to leaf fall stage. Across all deficit irrigation regimes, the lowest fruit yield was associated with the flowering to veraison stage. Irrigation after 35% depletion of available water during the stages of bud break to flowering, flowering to veraison, veraison to fruit harvest, and fruit harvest to leaf fall resulted in yield reductions of 32.8%, 43.2%, 8.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, compared to full irrigation at the corresponding stages. Irrigation after 70% depletion of available water during the same stages caused yield reductions of 73.7%, 82.8%, 36%, and 24.5%, respectively, compared to full irrigation (Table 3). Although the effect of year on fruit yield was not significant, there was a reduction of 7.3% and 12% in the second and third years compared to the first year, respectively (Table 4). A multiple linear regression analysis was performed for the fruit yield of Yaghooti grape. The traits influencing the predictive equation for yield (Yield) included cluster length (CL), cluster width (CWi), cluster weight (CWe), and the number of clusters per vine (C/V), as shown in Model 1.
Model 1)          Yield = 3481 + 126 CL – 68 CWi  + 14 CWe + 185 C/V
The highest (82.7%) and lowest (4.8%) fruit yield reduction rates were observed under irrigation after 35% depletion of available water during the flowering to veraison stage and irrigation after 70% depletion of available water during the fruit harvest to leaf fall stage, respectively. The highest rate of fruit yield reduction occurred when deficit irrigation was applied during the flowering to veraison stage. Conversely, the lowest rate of fruit yield reduction was observed when deficit irrigation was applied during the fruit harvest to leaf fall stage.
 
Discussion
The results showed that fruit yield responded differently to deficit irrigation. Deficit irrigation during the bud break to flowering and flowering to veraison stages had the greatest impact on reducing fruit yield, with the effect being more pronounced during the flowering to veraison stage. However, the impact of deficit irrigation during the veraison to fruit harvest and fruit harvest to leaf fall stages on yield was less compared to the bud break to flowering and flowering to veraison stages. The lowest fruit yield and the highest rate of yield reduction were observed under irrigation after 70% depletion of available water during the flowering to veraison stage, amounting to 1111 kg.ha^-1 and a yield reduction rate of 82.7%, respectively. The results showed that irrigation after 35% soil moisture deficiency during the stages of bud burst to flowering, from flowering to fruit color change, from berry color variation to harvest and from harvest to leaf fall reduced fruit yield by 27.9, 38, 7.1, and 4.1 percent compared to full irrigation in the corresponding stages, respectively. In general, by reducing the irrigation rate in the stages from berry color variation to harvest by 35% soil moisture deficiency, water consumption can be saved and yield is not significantly reduced.

Keywords

• Cluster length
• Cluster/vine
• Cluster weight
• Cluster width

Main Subjects

• Pomology

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

1. Alatzas, A., Theocharis, S., Miliordos, D.E., Kotseridis, Y., Koundouras, S., & Hatzopoulos, P. (2023). Leaf removal and deficit irrigation have diverse outcomes on composition and gene expression during berry development of Vitis vinifera cultivar Xinomavro. Oeno One, 57(1), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.7191
2. Buesa I., Ballester, C., Jose Manuel, M.A., & Intrigliolo, S. (2020). Effects of leaning grapevine canopy to the West on water use efficiency and yield under Mediterranean conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 295, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108166
3. Chacon-Vozmediano, J.L., Martinez-Gascuena, J., Francisco, J., Garcia-Navarro, J., & Jimenez-Ballesta, R. (2020). Effects of water stress on vegetative growth and ‘Merlot’ grapevine yield in a semi-arid mediterranean climate. Horticulturae, 6(95), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6040095
4. Coombe, B.G., & McCarthy, E.M.G. (2000). Dynamics of grape berry growth and physiology of ripening. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 6(2), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00171.x
5. Danesh Shahraki, M., Shahriari, A., Gangali, M., & Bameri, A. (2017). Seasonal and spatial variability of airborne dust loading rate over the Sistan plain cities and its relationship with some climatic parameters. Journal of Water and Soil Conservatio, 23(6), 199-215. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/JWFST.2017.11530.2595
6. Doulati Baneh, H., & Nourjou, A. (2012). Effect of deficit irrigation on quantitative and quality traits of fruit and water productivity of three grapevine cultivars. Seed and Plant Production, 2-27(4), 435-450. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/SPPJ.2017.110447
7. Du, T.S., Kang, S.Z., Zhang, J.H., Li, F.S., & Yan, B.U. (2008). Water use efficiency and fruit quality of table grape under alternate partial root-zo ne drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 659-668. https://doi.org/1016/j.agwat.2008.01.017
8. Edwards, E.J., & Clingeleffer, P.R. (2013). Interseasonal effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth, yield, water use, berry composition and wine attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 19, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12027
9. Fazeli Rostampour, M. (2020). The effect of irrigation regime and green pruning on some physiologic traits and yield of Yaghooti grape. Journal of Horticultural Science, 34(1), 185-196. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v34i1.83688
10. Fazeli Rostampour, M., & Mahmoudzadeh, H. (2023). Estimation of balance pruning and green pruning on quantitative tratis in table grape (Vitis vinifera cv. Yaghooti) in Sistan region. Journal of Horticultural Science, 37(1), 181-191. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2022.74552.1122
11. Fraga, H., Molitor, D., Leolini, L., & Santos, J.A. (2020). What is the impact of heat waves on European viticulture? A modelling assessment. Applied Sciences, 10(9), 3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093030
12. Gambetta, G.A., Manuck, C.M., Drucker, S.T., Shaghasi, T., Fort, K., Matthews, M.A., & McElrone, A.J. (2012). The relationship between root hydraulics and scion vigour across Vitis rootstocks: What role do root aquaporins play?. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(18), 6445-6455. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers312
13. Gatti, M., Bernizzoni, F., Civardi, S., & Poni, S. (2012). Effects of cluster thinning and preflowering leaf removal on growth and grape composition in cv. Sangiovese. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2012.11118
14. Gomez-Del-Campo, M., Baeza, P., Ruiz C., & Lissarrague, J.R. ( 2005). Effects of water stress on dry matter content and partitioning in for grapevine cultivars (Vitis Vinifera). Journal International des Sciences, 39(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2005.39.1.905
15. Karimi, M., Yazdani, M.H., & Naderi, A. (2013). The effect of 120-day winds on the safety of Sistan region. Geography and Environmental Planning Journal, 50(2), 111-128. (in Persian with English abstract). http://dorl.net/dor/1001.1.20085362.1392.24.2.9.6
16. Molavi, H., Mohammadi, M., & Liaghat, A.M. (2012). Effect of full irrigation and alternative furrow irrigation on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of tomato (Super Strain B). Journal of Water and Soil Science, 21(3), 115-126. (in Persian with English abstract).
17. Myburgh, P.A. (2003). Responses of Vilis vinifera cv. Sultanina to level of soil water depletion under semi-arid conditions. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 24, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.21548/24-1-2146
18. Ramos, M.C., & Martinez de Toda, F. (2020). Projecting changes in phenology and grape composition of “Tempranillo” and “Grenache” varieties under climate warming in Rioja DOCa. Vitis Geilweilerhof, 59, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.5073/2020.59.181-190
19. Santesteban, L.G., Miranda, C., & Royo, J.B. (2011). Regulated deficit irrigation effects on growth, yield, grape quality and individual anthocyanin composition in Vitis vinifera cv.‘Tempranillo’. Agricultural Water Management, 98(7), 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.011
20. Santos, J.A., Fraga, H., Malheiro, A.C., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Dinis, L.T., Correia, C., Moriondo, M., Leolini, L., Dibari, C., Costafreda-Aumedes, S., Kartschall, T,. Menz, C., Molitor, D., Junk, J., Beyer, M., & Schultz, H.R. (2020). A review of the potential climate change impacts and adaptation options for European viticulture. Applied Science, 10, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093092
21. Shahrokhnya, M.A., & Karami, M.J. (2016). Investigation of the effect of different amounts of irrigation water on the yield of Yaghouti grape. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 28(7), 122-108. (in Persian with English abstract).
22. Shellie, K.C. (2006). Vine and berry response of Merlot (Vitis vinifera L.) to differential water stress. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57(4), 514-518. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2006.57.4.514
23. Sun, R., Ma, J., Sun, X., Zheng, L., & Guo, J. (2023). Responses of the leaf water physiology and yield of grapevine via different irrigation strategies in extremely arid areas. Sustainability, 15, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042887
24. Tong, X., Wu, P., Liu, X., Zhang, L., Zhou, W., & Wang, Z. (2021). A global meta-analysis of fruit tree yield and water use efficiency under deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 260, 1-8. https://doi.org/1016/j.agwat.2021.107321
25. Van Leeuwen, C., Friant, P., Jaeck, M.E., Kuhn, S., & Lavialle, O. (2004). Hierarchy of the role of climate, soil and cultivar in terroir effect can largely be explained by vine water status. Joint International Conference on Viticultural Zoning, Gradignan, France, 433-439.
26. Yang C., Menz, C., Fraga, H., Costafreda-Aumedes, S., Leolini, L., Ramos, M.C., Molitor, D., Leeuwen, & C., Santos, J.A. (2022). Assessing the grapevine crop water stress indicator over the flowering-veraison phase and the potential yield lose rate in important European wine regions. Agricultural Water Management, 261, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107349
27. Zabihi, H.R., & Azarpajouh, E. (2004). Grape response to different soil moisture regimes. Journal of Soil and Water Science, 18(10), 34-39. (in Persian with English abstract).
28. Zokaee Khosroshahi, M., & Parvizi, K. (2024). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of grapes cv. Turkmen-4. Journal of Water and Soil, 38(1-93), 37-49. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2024.86374.1369