بررسی اثر ترینگزاپک اتیل بر افزایش مقاومت به تنش خشکی در چمن علف گندمی بیابانی (Agropyron desertorum)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• محمد حسین شیخ محمدی
• نعمت الله اعتمادی
• علی نیکبخت

دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.25045

چکیده

خشکسالی یکی از مهم ترین تنش‌های غیر زنده برای رشد چمن در سراسر دنیا می‌باشد. کاهش کیفیت چمن ناشی از تنش خشکی یکی از نگرانی‌های عمده در مدیریت چمن‌ها می‌باشد. یکی از روش‌هایی که باعث افزایش مقاومت به تنش‌های زیستی و غیر زیستی در گیاهان می‌گردد، استفاده از تنظیم کننده‌های رشد است. هدف از این مطالعه بررسی اثر تنظیم کننده ترینگزاپک‌اتیل بر افزایش مقاومت به تنش خشکی در چمن علف گندمی بیابانی می‌باشد. آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل بر پایه‌ی طرح کاملأ تصادفی در سه تکرار به اجرا درآمد. تیمار‌ها شامل سه سطح تنظیم کننده‌ی رشد ترینگزاپک‌اتیل (صفر، 25/0و 5/0 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و دو سطح تنش خشکی (آبیاری و قطع آبیاری) بود. نتایج نشان داد ترینگزاپک‌اتیل و خشکی به شکلی معنی‌دار موجب کاهش ارتفاع، وزن تر و خشک اندام هوایی گردیده است، ارتفاع در غلظت‌های 25/0 و 5/0 کیلوگرم درهکتار به ترتیب 20/19 و 90/26 درصد کاهش نشان داد. ترینگزاپک‌اتیل بر خلاف خشکی موجب بهبود کیفیت و عرض برگ شد. خشکی موجب کاهش معنی‌دار محتوی نسبی آب و کلروفیل، افزایش پرولین و نشت الکترولیت گردید. ترینگزاپک‌اتیل با افزایش محتوی نسبی آب، پرولین، کلروفیل و کاهش نشت الکترولیت در شرایط تنش خشکی موجب افزایش مقاومت به خشکی در علف گندمی گردید. در شرایط خشکی عمق نفوذ ریشه و عمق موثر ریشه افزایش پیدا کرد، در حالی که ترینگزاپک‌اتیل تأثیر معنی‌داری بر خصوصیات ریشه نداشت. نتایج مشخص کرد ترینگزاپک اتیل میتواند موجب افزایش مقاومت به خشکی در علف گندمی گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• ارتفاع
• تنظیم کننده رشد
• قطع آبیاری
• کیفیت

20.1001.1.20084730.1396.31.1.19.1

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Trinexapac-ethyl on Increased Resistance to Drought Stress in Wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum L.)

نویسندگان [English]

• Mohammad Hossein Sheikh Mohammadi
• Nematollah Etemadi
• Ali Nikbakht

Isfahan University of Technology

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Drought is one of the most detrimental abiotic stresses for turfgrass growth across a wide range of geographic locations. Most cool-season grass species are not well adapted to extended periods of drought, particularly during summer months. Decline in turf quality caused by drought stress is a major concern in turfgrass culture. Therefore, developing management practices for improving drought resistance of turfgrasses has become essential in arid and semi-arid regions, especially during water use restriction. One strategy to improve plant drought resistance is to promote drought avoidance by reducing water loss during drought, which may be achieved by slowing growth rate of shoots and lowering leaf area canopy to reduce demand for water. Application of growth regulators is one of the methods for increasing resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Trinexapac-ethyl (TE) is one of the most widely used PGRs in the management of cool-season and warm-season turfgrass species. TE absorbed quickly by foliage and slow cell elongation through inhibiting of converting one form of gibberellic acid (GA20) to another (GA1). Most studies conducted under non-stressed conditions found that TE application increased chlorophyll content, turf quality, turf density and reduced shoot extension rate. We hypothesized that TE may influence plant tolerance to drought stress. Limited available data─ as reported in the above referred studies─ suggest that TE application may be beneficial for plant tolerance to stresses, but the effectiveness varies with turfgrass species, dose and duration of TE treatment, and type of stress. The main aim of this research is to evaluate the effect of Trinexapac-ethyl on increased resistance to drought stress in wheatgrass.
Materials and Methods: Wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum L.) was used in this study. This study was conducted in field conditions at Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.. Wheatgrass native seeds (Agropyron desertorum L.), collected from the turfgrass research farm at Fereydan, Isfahan, which were cultivated hand broadcast in plots (3m × 2m) with seeding rates of 30 gm–2. A factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was conducted for TE (Primo Maxx; Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Greensboro, NC) and drought stress. Treatments involved three levels of Trinexapac-ethyl growth regulator (0, 0.25 and 0.5 kg/h) and two levels of drought stress (with irrigation and without irrigation). After planting, the plots were irrigated to maintain soil moisture at 80% field capacity or higher. Irrigation was applied as required to prevent any drought stress during grass establishment. Turfgrass species were maintained at cutting height of 4 cm and were mowed once a week using a reel-type mower. All data were subjected to analysis of variance using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and Fisher’s protected LSD test was employed at the 5% probability level..
Results Discussion: Results indicated that Trinexapac-ethyl and drought reduced growth, fresh weight and dried above ground organs significantly. Wheatgrass growth in concentrations 0.25 and 0.5 kg/h were 19.20 and 26.90%, respectively. Previous studies reported plants that have slow-growing shoots may survive more extended periods than faster-growing plants in drought conditions. Slow growth may reduce the adverse impact of drought by conserving water and carbon energy, and plants can use limited water to survive drought for an extended period of time. Unlike drought stress, Trinexapac-ethyl improved the quality of plant tissues and their color. Increase in turf quality under TE treatment might occur as a result of improved canopy photosynthesis capacity and single-leaf photochemical efficiency. Drought stress reduced relative water and chlorophyll content, increased proline level and finally led to electrolyte leakage. Trinexapac-ethyl improved wheatgrass in drought stress conditions by increasing relative water content, prolin, chlorophyll and decreasing electrolyte leakage and increased wheatgrass to drought stress resistance. Proline acts as an osmotic regulator in cytoplasm and vacuoles, protects proteins against dehydration, adjusts osmosis; detoxify radical active oxygen species, keeping more stable antioxidant enzymes. Proline immediate increase under drought stress is associated with decreasing leaf water content, in turn, induced drought tolerance. Under drought stress conditions, penetration of root depth and effective root depth has been increased, while Trinexapac-ethyl did not affect root traits significantly. The results of the present study indicated that TE decreased damages on drought stress probably via improving turf quality, chlorophyll concentration, leaf water content, proline content and less electrolyte leakage in Wheatgrass.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Height
• Growth regulators
• Without irrigation
• Turf quality

مراجع

1- Abdul Jaleel C., Gopi R., Manivannan P., and Panneerselvam R. 2008. Exogenous application of triadimefon affects the antioxidant defense system of WithaniasomniferaDunal. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 91(3):170-174.

2- Abrahama E.M., Huang B., Bonosb S.A., and Meyerb W.A. 2004. Evaluation of Drought Resistance for Texas Bluegrass, Kentucky Bluegrass, and Their Hybrids. Crop Science, 44: 1746-1753.

3- Allard G., Nelson C.J., and Pallardy S.G. 1991. Shade effects on growth of tall fescue: I. Leaf anatomy and dry matter partitioning. Crop Science. 31: 163-167.

4- Baldwin C.M., Liu H.B., McCarty L.B., Bauerle W.L., and Toler J.E. 2006. Effects of trinexapac-ethyl on the salinity tolerance of two ultradwarfbermudagrass cultivars. HortScience. 41: 808–814.

5- Barrs H.D., and Weatherley P.E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Journal of Biological Sciences. 24: 519-570.

6- Beard J.B., and Sifers S.I. 1997. Genetic diversity in dehydration avoidance and droutght resistance within the Cynodon and Zoysia species. International Turfgrass Society. 8: 603–610.

7- Beasley J.S., and Branham B.E. 2007. Trinexapac-ethyl and paclobutrazol affect Kentucky bluegrass single-leaf carbon exchange rates and plant growth. Crop Science. 47(1): 132-138.

8- Beasley J.S., Branham B.E. and Ortiz-Ribbing L.M. 2005. Trinexapac-ethyl Affects Kentucky Bluegrass Root Architecture. HortScience. 40: 1539-1542.

9- Betes L.S., Waldren R.P., and Teare I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and soil science. 39: 205-207.

10- Bian X., Merewitz E., and Huang B. 2009. Effects of Trinexapac-ethyl on Drought Responses in Creeping Bentgrass Associated with Water Use and Osmotic Adjustment. HortScience. 134: 505–510.

11- Bingaman B.R., Christians N.E., and Gardner D.S. 2001. Trinexapac-ethyl effects on rooting of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) sod. International Turfgrass Society. 9: 832–834.

12- Blum A. 1974. Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress, II. Leaf tissue water relations. Crop Science. 14: 691-692.

13- Blum A., and Ebercon A. 1981. Cell memberane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Science. 21: 43-47.

14- Carrow R.N., and Duncan R.R. 2003. Improving drought resistance and persistence in turf-type tall fescue. Crop Science. 43: 978–984.

15- DaCosta M. 2006. Physiological and Morphological Characteristics Associated with Drought Resistance Mechanisms in Bentgrass Species. Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.

16- Daniels R.W., and Sugden S.K. 1996. Opportunities for Growth Regulation of Amenity Grass. Pesticide Science. 47: 363-369.

17- Ehrler W.L., and Van Bavel C.H.M. 1967. Sorghum foliar responses to changes in soil water content. Agronomy Journal. 59: 243-246.

18- Ervin E.H., and Koski A.J. 2001. Kentucky bluegrass growth responses to Trinexapac-ethyl, traffic, and nitrogen. Crop Science. 41:1871-1877.

19- Ervin E.H., Zhang X., Askew S.D., and Goatley J.M. 2004. Trinexapac-ethyl, Propiconazole, Iron, and Biostimulant Effects on Shaded Creeping Bentgrass. HortTechnology. 14: 500-506.

20- Etemadi E., Khalighi A., Razmjoo J., Lessani H., and Zamani Z. 2005. Drought resistance of selected bermudagrass (Cynodondactylon (L.) Pers.) Accessions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 7: 612-615.

21- Fagerness M.J., and Yelverton F.H. 2001. Plant Growth Regulator and Mowing Height Effects on Seasonal Root Growth of Penncross Creeping Bentgrass. Crop Science. 41: 1901–1905.

22- Fagerness M.J., Yelverton F.H., Livingston D.P., and Rufty T.W. 2002. Temperature and Trinexapac-ethyl effects on Bermudagrass growth, dormancy, and freezing tolerance. Crop Science. 42: 853- 857.

23- Fan G., Bian X., Li H., Meng Z., and Liu S. 2009. Growth responses of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) to trinexapac-ethyl applied in spring and autumn. Frontiers of Agriculture. 3: 186-189.

24- Fu J., and Huang B. 2001. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 45: 105-114.

25- Grossmann K. 1992. Plant growth retardants: their mode of action and benefit for physiological research. Current plant science and biotechnology in agriculture. 788-797.

26- Heckman N.L., Gaussoin R.E., and Horst G.L. 2001. Multiple trinexapac-ethyl applications reduce Kentucky bluegrass sod storage temperatures. HortTechnology. 11: 595–598.

27- Heckman N.L., Horst G.L., Gaussoin R.E., and Frank K.W. 2001. Storage and handling characteristics of trinexapac-ethyl treated Kentucky bluegrass sod. HortScience. 36: 1127–1130.

28- Heckman, N.L., Horst G.L., Gaussoin R.E., and Young L.J. 2001. Heat tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass as affected by trinexapac-ethyl. HortScience. 36: 365–367.

29- Huang B. 1997. Drought-Resistance Mechanisms of Seven Warm- Season Turfgrasses under Surface Soil Drying: I. Shoot Response. Crop Science. 1858-1863.

30- Huang B., and Fu J. 2001. Growth and Phsiological Responses of Tall Fescue to Surface Soil Drying. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 291-296.

31- Huang B., and Gao H. 2000. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Science. 40: 196-203.

32- Jiang H., and Fry J. 1998. Drought responses of perennial ryegrass treated with plant growth regulators. HortScience. 33: 270–273.

33- Lichtenhaler H.K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids, the pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In: R. Douce and L. Packer (eds.). Methods Enzymol. Academic Press Inc, New York. PP. 350-382.

34- Lickfeldt D.W., Gardner D.S., Branham B.E., and Voigt T.B. 2001. Implications of repeated trinexapac-ethyl applications on Kentucky bluegrass. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 93: 1164–1168.

35- Marcum K.B. 1998. Cell memberanethermostability and whole-plant heat tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Science. 38: 1214-1218.

36- Mayoral M.L., Atsmon D., Shimshi D., and Gromet-Elhanan Z. 1981. Effect of Water Stress on Enzyme Activities in Wheat and Related Wild Species: Carboxylase Activity, Electron Transport and Photophosphorylation in Isolated Chloroplasts. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 8(5) 385 – 393.

37- Malonaka K., Oaiawa T., and Imagawa H. 2006. Changes in chloroplast peroxidase activities in relation to chlorophyll loss in barley leaf segments. PhysiologiaPlantarum. 80(4): 555–560

38- Medrano H., Escalona J.M., Gulias G., and Flexas J. 2002. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plant in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as reference parametr. Annals of Botany: Oxford Journals. 595: 889-905.

39- McCann S.E., and Huang B. 2007. Effects of trinexapac-ethyl foliar application on creeping bentgrass responses to combined drought and heat stress. Crop Science. 47: 2121–2128.

40- McCullough P.E., Liu H., McCarty L.B., Whitwell T., and Toler J.E. 2006. Bermudagrass putting green growth, color, and nutrient partitioning influenced by nitrogen and trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Science. 46: 1515–1525.

41- Morris, K. N. 2002. A guide to NTEP turfgrass rating. A publication of the National Turfgrass Evaluation program, NETP. 11: 30-39.

42- Nilsen E.T., and D.M. Orcutt. 1996. Physiology of plants under stress. Abiotic factors. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

43- Pannacci, E., Covarelli G., and Tei F. 2004. Evaluation of trinexapac-ethyl for growth regulation of five cool-season turfgrass species. Acta Horticulturae. 661: 349–351.

44- Pessarakli M. 2008. Handbook of turfgrass management and physiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

45- Stier J.C., and Rogers J.N. 2001. Trinexapac-Ethyl and Iron Effects on Supina and Kentucky Bluegrasses Under Low Irradiance. Crop Science. 41: 457–465.

46- Wang, Z., Huang B., and Xu Q. 2003. Genotypic variation in abscisic acid accumulation, water relations, and gas exchange for Kentucky bluegrass exposed to drought stress. HortScience. 128: 349-355.

47- Weaver J.E., and Zink, E.1946. Length of Life of Roots of Ten Species of Perennial Range and Pasture Grasses. Agronomy & Horticulture. Faculty Publications. Paper 500.

48- Xu, C., and Huang B. 2011. Proteins and Metabolites Regulated by Trinexapac-ethyl in Relation to Drought Tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 31: 25-37.

49- Zulini, L., Rubinigg, M., Zorer, R., and Bertamini M. 2007. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic pigments in grapevine leaves (Vitisvinifera cv. ‘White Riesling’). Acta Horticulturae. 754: 289-294.