Sustainable Production of Quince by Using Fulvic Acid Bio Stimulant and Calcium

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Ali Akbar Shokouhian
• Somayeh Mohammadi Shevir
• Shahriyar Einizadeh

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2021.69426.1037

Abstract

Background and Objectives
 Fulvic acid has a relatively low molecular weight and contains a large number of oxygen and carbon-rich functional groups. Many of the beneficial effects of fulvic acid spray include stimulating plant metabolism, increasing the activity of transaminase and invertase enzymes, increasing bioavailability and nutrient uptake, as well as increasing crop growth and yield. Fulvic acid spraying solution helps to transfer minerals to metabolic sites within plant cells. Fulvic acid at certain stages of plant growth can be used as a major method to maximize plant production capacity. Due to the fact that calcium transfer is difficult, although the soil is rich in this element, so its foliar application is recommended. In addition, calcium deficiency leads to a decrease in root growth and leaf loss, but also leads to the production of poor quality fruits. Therefore, this study was carried out with the aim of investigating the use of fulvic acid and calcium as a spraying solution on growth and yield of Quince ‘Haj Agha Kishi’.
Materials and Methods         
 In order to investigate the effects of fulvic acid concentration and chelated calcium on quality and quantity of fruit indices of Quince ‘Haj Agha Kishi’ an experiment was conducted during 2017-2018 in kosar city, Ardabil province. The experiment was performed as a factorial in based on the randomized complete block design with four levels of fulvic acid application with concentrations of 0, 1, 2 and 3 per thousand and three levels of application of chelated calcium with concentrations of 0, 1.5 and 3 per thousand in three replications. The treatments were applied to six-year-old seedlings. The treatments were applied on the trees as a spray solution and applied three times: after fruit set, one and two months after fruit set. In this study, leaf chlorophyll content index was measured by Arnon method. The leaf area of the plant was measured with a level gauge, model AM300, In this study 10 leaves were randomly selected from each tree branch, the average leaf area was multiplied by the number of main and secondary branches, and the leaf area of each treatment was recorded as average. In order to determine the length, diameter and average weight of fruit, ten fruits were randomly harvested from treated trees, then the diameter and length of the fruits were measured with a caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. Also, the weight of the fruits was determined with a scale of model GF800, made in Japan with an accuracy of 0.01 grams. Yield was calculated by measuring the total weight of the crop in each tree. Statistical analysis of data was performed using SAS 9.2 statistical software. Means were compared based on LSD lest at 1 or 5% and charts were drawn using EXCEL 2013 software.    
Results
 The results of data analysis of variance showed that the effects of chelated calcium and fulvic acid on leaf area, length, diameter, wet weight and fruit yield were significant (P<0.01). Based on the results, fulvic acid had a significant (P<0.05) effect on chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content of leaf. The interaction of calcium ×fulvic acid treatments had a significant (P<0.01) effect on leaf area and fruit length. The highest total chlorophyll content of 1.20 mg.g^-1 was obtained by using 3 per thousand concentration of fulvic acid and the lowest rate was 0.79 mg.g^-1 in the control. The highest (5481.69 mm²) leaf area was obtained with the simultaneous use of 3 per thousand concentration of chelated calcium and 3 per thousand concentration of fulvic acid, which was significantly different from other levels. The lowest leaf area was also observed in control. Comparison of the means showed that the treatments of 3 per thousand concentration chelated calcium and 3 per thousand concentration of fulvic acid had the highest fruit yield with 167.63 and 135.30 kg, respectively. The lowest yield was recorded for control trees.                                 
 Conclusion
 Increasing yield and quality is the most important goal in agricultural production. Due to the fact that biostimulants do not have adverse effects on soil and water. In order to maintain sustainable production should be used in the production program. Folic acid, as a biostimulant, improves plant metabolism and facilitates the absorption of elements. According to the findings of this study, application of fulvic acid and chelated calcium at 3 per thousand concentrations is recommended for Quince ‘Haj Agha Kishi’ to improve leaf efficiency and fruit yield.                             

Keywords

• Biofertilizer
• Chlorophyll
• Humic substances
• Yield

20.1001.1.20084730.1401.36.1.16.3

Main Subjects

• Pomology

References

1. Abdel-Baky Y.R., Abouziena H.F., Amin A.A., Rashad El-Sh M., and Abd El-Sttar A.M. 2019. Improve quality and productivity of some faba bean cultivars with foliar application of fulvic acid, Bulletin of the National Research Centre 43: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-018-0040-3.
2. Aiken G.R., McKnight D.M., Wershaw R.L., and Mccarthy P. 1985. Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water: Geochemistry, Isolation and Characterization. John Wiley & Sons. New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350210213.
3. Anjum S.A., Wang L., Farooq M., Xue L., and Ali S. 2011. Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under well-watered and drought conditions, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(6): 409- 417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00483.x.
4. Arnon D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, Polyphenol oxidase in Beta Vulgaris, Plant Physiology 24(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
5. Bakhshandeh E., Soltani A., and Ghadiryan R. 2012. Leaf area index measurement by AccuPAR instrument in wheat, Journal of Plant Production 18(4): 97-102. (In Persian)
6. Calvo P., Nelson L., and Kloepper J.W. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants, Plant Soil 383: 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8.
7. Canellas L.P., Olivares F.L., Aguiar N.O., Jones D.L., Nebbioso A., Mazzei P., and Piccolo A. 2015. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture, Scientia Horticulturae 196: 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013.
8. Chen Y., De Nobili M., and Aviad T. 2004. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: F. MAGDOFF, R. R. WEIL (eds.): Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. 103-129 CRC Press. New York. USA.
9. Çimrin K.M., Türkmen Ö., Turan M., and Tuncer B. 2010. Phosphorus and humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of pepper seedling, African Journal of. Biotechnology 9(36): 5845–5851.
10. Dobbss L.B., Medici L.O., Peres L.E.P., Pino-Nunes L.E., Rumjanek V.M., Façanha A.R., and Canellas L.P. 2007. Changes in root development of Arabidopsis promoted by organic matter from oxisols, Annals of Applied Biology 151: 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00166.x.
11. Eidizadeh Kh., Mahdavi Damghani A.M., Ebrahimpoor F., and Sabahi H. 2011. Effects of integrated application of biological and chemical fertilizer and application method of biofertilizer on yield and yield components of maize, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 4(3): 21-35.
12. El-kenawy M. 2017. Effect of Chitosan, Salicylic Acid and Fulvic Acid on Vegetative Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Thompson Seedless Grapevines, Egyptian Journal of Horticulture 44(1): 45-59. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJOH.2017.1104.1007.
13. Gulser F., Sonmez F., and Boysan S. 2010. Effects of calcium nitrate and humic acid on pepper seedling growth under saline condition, Journal of Environmental Biology 31: 873-876.
14. Hatami E., Shokouhian A.A, Ghanbari A.R., and Naseri L. 2020. Investigation the effect of humic acid on some morphhophysiological and biochemical characteristics of almond rootstocks under salinity stress, Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 15(3): 523-526. https://doi.org/ 10.22059/IJHS.2019.277630.1615.
15. Haleema B., Rab A., and Hussain S.A. 2018. Effect of Calcium, Boron and Zinc Foliar Application on Growth and Fruit Production of Tomato, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 34(1): 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.1.19.30.
16. Hamauzu Y., Inno T., Kume C., Irie M., and Hiramatsu K. 2006. Antioxidant and antiulcerative properties of phenolics from Chinese quince, quince, and apple fruits, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052236y.
17. Hirschi K.D. 2004. The calcium conundrum. Both versatile nutrient and specific signal, Plant Physiology 136: 2438-2442. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.046490.
18. Ho M.M., Burcher S., and Ching L.L. 2008. Food future now. Isis TWN Report.P.2.
19. Hussain N., Ali A., Sarwar G., Mujeeb F., and Tahir M. 2003. Mechanism of salt tolerance in rice, Pedosphere 13: 233-238.
20. Ilyas M., Ayub G., Hussain Z., Ahmad M., Bibi B., Rashid A., and Luqman. 2014. Response of tomato to different levels of calcium and magnesium concentration, World Applied Sciences Journal 31(9): 1560-1564.
21. Jifon J.L., and Leste G.E. 2009. Foliar potassium fertilization improves fruit quality of field-grown muskmelon on calcareous soils in south Texas, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 2452–2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3745.
22. Johnson R.S. 2008. Nutrient and water requirements of peach trees. In: The peach botany, production and uses, Lyne, D.R., Bassi, D. (eds.), CAB International. Cambridge 310–311.
23. Karakurt Y., Unlu H., Unlu H., and Padem H. 2009. The influence of foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid on yield and quality of pepper, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science 59: 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710802022952.
24. Khreba A.H., Hassan A.H., Ema M.S., and Atal S.A. 2014. Effect of some pre and postharvest treatments on quality and storability of strawberry fruits, Journal of American Science 10: 239-248.
25. Kulikova N.A., Stepanova E.V., and Koroleva O.V. 2005. Mitigating activity of humic substances: Direct influence on biota. In Use of Humic Substances to Remediate Polluted Environments: From Theory to Practice; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands 285–309.
26. Malan C. 2015. Review: humic and fulvic acids. A Practical Approach. pp: 39. In Sustainable soil management symposium, Stellenbosch. 5-6 November 2015. Agrilibrium Publisher.
27. Moreira R., Chenlo F., Torres M.D., and Vallej N. 2008. Thermodynamic analysis of experimental sorption isotherms of loquat and quince fruits, Journal of Food Engineering 88: 514–521. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.03.011.
28. Neilsen G., Neilsen D., Dong S., Toivone P., and Peryea F. 2005. Application of CaCl₂ sprays earlier in the season may reduce bitter pit incidence in 'Braeburn' apple, HortScience 40: 1850-1853. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.6.1850.
29. Parandian F., and Samavat S. 2012. Effects of fulvic acid and humic acid on anthocyanin, soluble sugar, α-amylase enzyme and some micronutrients in lilium, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3(5): 924-929.
30. Piccolo A., Conte P., Spaccini R., and Chiarella M. 2003. Effects of some dicarboxylic acids on the association of dissolved humic substance, Biology and Fertility of Soils 37: 255–259. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00374-003-0583-8.
31. Piccolo A., and Mbagw J.S.C. 1999. Role of Hydrophobic Components of Soil Organic Matter in Soil Aggregate Stability, Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 1801–1810. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361801x.
32. Priya B.N.V., Mahavishnan K., Gurumurthy D.S., Bindumadhava H., Upadhyaya A.P., and Sharmaa N.K. 2014. Fulvic Acid (FA) for enhanced nutrient uptake and growth: Insights from biochemical and genomic studies, Journal Crop Improvement 28: 740-757.
33. Shahid M., Muhmood A., Ihtisham M., ur Rahman M., Amjad N., Sajid M., Riaz K., and Ali A. 2020. Fruit yield and quality of ’Florida King’ peaches subjected to foliar calcium chloride aprays at different growth stages, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 19(1): 131-139. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2020.1.12.
34. Suh H.Y., Yoo K.S., and Su S.G. 2014. Effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on plant growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 55: 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-014-0004-y.
35. Tabatabaei S.J. 2013. Principles of mineral nutrition of plants, Tabriz University Press. 562p. (In Persian)
36. Vaughan D., and Ord B.G. 1981. Uptake and incorporation of14C-labelled soil organic matter by roots of Pisum sativum, Journal of Experimental Botany 32: 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.4.679.
37. Wojdyło A., Oszmianski J., and Bielicki P. 2013, Polyphenolic composition, antioxidant activity, and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity of quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) varieties, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61: 2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf304969b.
38. Yakhin O., Lubyanov A.A., Yakhin I.A., and Brown P. 2017. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective, Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 2049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049.
39. Zaky M.H., Zoah E.L., and Ahmed M.E. 2006. Effect of humic acids on growth and productivity of bean plants grown under plastic low tunnels and open field, Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences 21: 582-596.