بررسی تأثیر تنش شوری روی صفات فیزیولوژی و بیوشیمیایی ژنوتیپ‌‌های مرکبات

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• بهروز گلعین ¹
• ولی ربیعی ²
• فائزه میرعباسی ²
• رضا فیفائی ³
• محمد فاضل حلاجی ثانی ¹

¹ موسسه تحقیقات مرکبات کشور

² دانشگاه زنجان - گروه علوم باغبانی

³ سازمان تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.31371

چکیده

مرکبات جزء گیاهان حساس به شوری هستند، اما میزان تحمل ارقام مختلف در این گروه به شوری متفاوت است. در این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی ژنوتیپ‌‌های مرکبات متحمل به شوری، آزمایشی گلخانه‌ای به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها در چهار سطح کلرید سدیم (صفر، 2، 4 و 6 دسی‌زیمنس بر متر) روی دانهال‌های شش‌ماهه 10 ژنوتیپ ناشناخته مرکبات همراه با نارنگی کلئوپاترا و سیتروملو، به‌ترتیب به‌عنوان شاهد متحمل و حساس به شوری بوده است. بستر حاوی نسبت‌های برابر از پرلیت، ماسه و خاک باغچه بودند. صفات اندازه‌گیری شده شامل: وزن‌تر و خشک اندام‌های هوایی و ریشه، میزان نسبی آب‌برگ، تعداد روزنه، کلر و سدیم برگ و ریشه، کلروفیل کل، پرولین، پراکسیداسیون لیپیدها و فعالیت آنزیم پراکسیداز بوده است. نتایج نشان داد که اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ و سطح شوری در میزان نسبی آب‌برگ، تعداد روزنه و سدیم ریشه اختلاف معنی‌داری نداشت ولی صفات دیگر در سطح 1 درصد و میزان کلروفیل کل در سطح 5 درصد معنی‌دار شدند. با افزایش سطوح شوری، کمترین میزان تجمع سدیم برگ در ژنوتیپ G9 با 28/0 درصد و بیشترین مربوط به ژنوتیپ G6 با 53/0 درصد تعلق داشت. بیشترین میزان کلر برگ در ژنوتیپ G6 با 1/3 درصد و کمترین در ژنوتیپ G11 با 7/1 درصد بدست آمد. همچنین در ژنوتیپ G9، مقدار پراکسیداسیون لیپیدها با مقدار 14 میلی‌مولار، نسبت به سایر ژنوتیپ‌ها افزایش کمتری داشت. از میان ژنوتیپ‌‌ها، ژنوتیپ G9 تحمل بیشتری در برابر تنش شوری از خود نشان داد که از آن می‌توان در برنامه‌های به‌نژادی بهره جست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• بیوتیپ
• پرولین
• تحمل
• کلرید سدیم
• نارنگی کلئوپاترا

20.1001.1.20084730.1394.29.3.11.3

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Salinity Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Traits in Citrus Genotypes

نویسندگان [English]

• Behrooz Golein ¹
• Vali Rabiei ²
• Faezeh Mirabbasi ²
• Reza Fifaei ³
• Mohammad Fazel Halaji Sani ¹

¹ Citrus and Sub-Tropical Fruits Research Center, Ramsar

² Zanjan University

³

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Citrus (L.) is a large genus that covers several major cultivatedspecies, including Citrussinensis (sweet orange), C.reticulata (tangerine and mandarin), C. limon (lemon), C.grandis (pummelo), and C. paradisi (grapefruit).Citrus is one of the world’s important fruit crops and grown inmost areas with suitable climates between latitude 35◦N–35◦S. InIran, citrus industry is of paramount importance. Citrus species have been classified as salt-sensitive crops, although their relative tolerance can be influenced by climate, fertilization, soil type, irrigation method and rootstock. Citrus rootstocks differ in their ability to exclude Cl−and/or Na+from the scion. Many authors have contrasted the relative abilities of rootstocks to restrict movement of salts to the scions. The rootstocks Cleopatra mandarin (C. reshni), Rangpur lime (C. limonia) and Severiniabuxifolia (Poir) Tenore were relatively effective in restricting Cl−transport to scions, whereas the rootstocks Swingle citrumelo and Carrizo citrange were found to be less restrictive. Although the mechanism by which some rootstocks reduce concentrations of ions in the scion is still unknown, it seems to depend on the vigor of the scion and on water requirements. There are a number of reports demonstrating that both scion and rootstock may influence Cl−accumulation in leaves. Several papers reported that accumulation of Na+ in shoots seemed to be more dependent on rootstock–scion combinations. Since, citrus species are different in salt tolerance and use of tolerant rootstocks can decrease salinity damages, sothis study was conducted to identify tolerant genotypes among unknown types from the Kotra Citrus Research Station, Citrus and Sub-Tropical Fruits Research Center (Ramsar).
Materials and Methods: The experiment was –arrangedin afactorial, based on completely randomized design in three replications with two plantsin each experimental unit in Iran Citrus Research Institute.Treatment included 10 citrus natural genotypes along with two varieties of Cleopatra mandarin (tolerant plant) and Swinglecitrumelo (sensitive plant) with six-month old and four salinity levels of sodium chloride: 0(control), 2, 4 and 6 dsm-1, for 16 weeks in the greenhouse condition. Effect of salinity on fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, relative water content (using upper leaves), stomatal density (with counting of stomata using microscope), concentration ofCl (with titration method of silver nitrate) and Na (by flame photometry) in roots and leaves, content of total chlorophyll (using acetone 80%), proline (spectrophotometry at wavelength of 520 nm), lipid peroxidation (spectrophotometry at wavelength of 532 nm) and activity of peroxidase enzyme (spectrophotometry at wavelength of 470 nm)were investigated. Data analysis was done by SAS 9.1 software.
Results and Discussion: The results indicated that, the interaction of genotypes and salinity levels hadnot significant difference in relative water content, stomatal density and Na+concentration - in roots but, other traits except total chlorophyll content which was significant at 5% level, were significant at 1% level. Shoot fresh and dry weight of genotypes No. 4 and 6 were significantly (P

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Biotype
• Proline
• Tolerance
• Sodium Chloride
• Cleopatra mandarin

مراجع

Abutalebi A.H., Tafazoli E., Kholdebarin B., Karimian N.A., and Emam Y. 2007. Effect of salinity on chlorophyll, solute leakage and relative water content in five citrus rootstocks. Journal of Science and Agricultural Process, 21(10):3-11. (in Persian with English abstract)

2- Anjum M.A. 2008. Effect of NaCl concentrations in irrigation water on growth and polyamine metabolism in two citrus rootstocks with different levels of salinity tolerance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 30:43-52.

3- Arbona V., Flors V., Jacas J., Garcia-Agustin P., and Gomez – Cadenas A. 2003. Enzymatic and non - enzymatic antioxidant responses of Carrizo citrange, a salt-sensitive citrus rootstock, to different levels of salinity. Plant Cell Physiology, 44:388-394.

4- Arnon D.I. 1949. Copper Enzymes in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24:1-15.

5- Ballester F.G., Sanchez G.F., Cerda A., and Martinez V. 2003. Tolerance of citrus rootstock seedling to saline stress based on their ability to regulate ion uptake and transport. Tree Physiology, 23:265-271.

6- Barr H.D., and Weatherley P.E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15:413-428.

7- Bates L.S., Waldron R.P., and Teare I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39:205-208.

8- Gimno V., Syvertsen J.P., Nieves M., Simo I., Martinez V., and Sanchez F.G. 2009. Additional nitrogen fertilization affects salt tolerance of lemon trees on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 3235:10-16.

9- Golein B., and Adouli B. 2011. Citrus. Novin Poya Press, Tehran. (in Persian).

10- Gomez C.A., Arbona V., Jacas J., Primo-Millo E., and Talon M. 2003. Abscisic acid reduces leaf abscission and increases salt tolerance in citrus plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator, 21:234-240.

11- Heath R.L., and Packer L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 125:189–198.

12- Jones B., and Case V.W. 1990. Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. p. 338-420. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Soli Science Society of America.

13- Kalir A., Omri G., and Poljakoff-Mayber A. 1984. Peroxidase and catalase activity in leaves of Halimione portulacoides exposed to salinity. Physiologia Plantrum, 62:238–244.

14- Kozlowski T.T. 2007. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Monograph, 1:1-29.

15- Li Y. 2008. Kinetics of the antioxidant response to salinity in the halophyte Limonium bicolor. Plant Soil Environment, 54:493-497.

16- Melgar J.C., Syvertsen J.P., Martinez V., and Sanchez G.F. 2008. Leaf gas exchange, water relations, nutrient content and growth in citrus and olive seedlings under salinity. Biologia Plantarum, 52:385-390.

17- Montoliu A., Lopez- Climent M.F., Arbona V., Perez- Clemente R.M., and Gomez- Cadenas A. 2009. A novel In vitro tissue culture approach to study salt stress responses in citrus. Plant Growth Regulation, 59:179-187.

18- Murkute A.A., Satyawati S.H., and Singh S.K. 2010. Biochemical alteration in foliar tissues of citrus genotypes screened in vitro for salinity tolerance. Journal Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 19:19-25.

19- Nair V., Oneil C.L., and Wang P.G. 2008. Malondialdehyde Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

20- Nasir khan M., Siddiqui M.H., Mohammad F., Masroor M., Khan A., and Naeem M. 2007. Salinity induced changes in growth, enzyme activities, photosynthesis, proline accumulation and yield in Linseed genotypes. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 35:685-695.

21- Neto A.D.A., Prisco J.T., Eneas-Filho J., Abreu C.E.B.A., and Gomes-Filho E. 2005. Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56:87-94.

22- Romero-Arando R., Moya J.L., Tadeo F.R., Legaz F., Primo-Millo E., and Talon M. 1998. Physiological and anatomical disturbances induced by chloride salts in sensitive and tolerant citrus: beneficial and detrimental effects of cations. Plant Cell Environment, 21:1243-1253.

23- Sanchez G.F., Peres J.G., Botina P., and Martinez V. 2006. The response of young mandarin trees grown under saline conditions depends on the rootstock. European Journal of Agronomy, 24:129-139.

24- Storey R., and Walker R.R.1999. Citrus and salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78:39-81.

25- Yokoi S.H., Bressan R.A., and Hasegawa P.M. 2002. Salt stress tolerance of plants. Jircas Working Report, 25-33.