Investigation of Morphologic Variation and Essence Value in several Thyme Native Species (Thymus sp) of Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mahdieh Razaei ¹
• Abbas Safarnejad ²
• Mostafa Arab ¹
• Seyyedeh Bibi Leila Alamdari ³
• Marzieh Dalir ³

¹ College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran

² Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center or Mashhad Branch

³ Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v30i3.30435

Abstract

Introduction: Thyme is an important medicinal plant in cosmetic, pharmaceutical and food industries. The genus Thymus L. (Lamiaceae) consists of about 300 species of herbaceous perennials and subshrubs. This genus is mainly distributed over Mediterranean country, northern part of Africa and Southern Greenland. Thymus species are commonly used as spices, herbal tea, insecticide and flavoring materials. Also, Thymus have been most frequently used in traditional herbal medicine due to its antiseptic, carminative, expectorant, antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory properties. Recent studies have showed that this genus have strong antifungal, antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Because of these medical features of this genus, Thymus is cultivated all over the world. The aromatic and medicinal properties of the genus thymus have made it one of the most popular plantsthroughout all of the world.
Materials and Methods: In order to study genetic variations, 22 populations of endemic species of Thymus include thirteen populations from species of T. daenensis, four populations of T. migricus and one population from each of the following species: T. fedtschenkoi, T. vulgaris, T. transcaspicus, T. pubsence and T. kotschyanus were used for assessment of morphology and essence value. Populations in completely random block design with three replications at the Razavi-khorasan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center were planted. Morphological measurement was taken on five random individuals of each replicate and average traits were analyzed. Clevenger unit was used to measure the essence amount. Morphological traits were included leaf length, leaf width, leaf number of year stem, maximum diameter of canopy, minimum diameter of canopy, canopy area, height flowering stem, height inflorescence, number of stems per plant, number days to starting of flowering, number days to 50% of flowering, fresh yield, dry yield, height of stem than inflorescence, and essence weight and volume. A balanced completely randomized design with three replications was used. Biometric measurement was applied to study the selected thyme populations. SAS, SPSS and NTSYS softwares were used for calculating the statistics indicators, normality tests, analysis of variance, means of traits, correlation coefficients, stepwise regression analysis and principal component analysis.
Result Discussion: A wide range of morphological variety was observed by biometric measurements. The results showed that there were highly significant differences between thyme populations. Mean comparison was carried out using Duncan method at 5% level. Population No.18 and population No.4 were showed the highest and the lowest diameter of canopy, respectively. Population No.18 and population No.4 exhibited maximum and minimum canopy area, respectively. Maximum and minimum stem lengths were related to populations No.12 and No.4, respectively. Maximum and minimum numbers of stems at each plant were seen in populations No.12 and No.2, respectively. Inflorescence length of population No.6 was maximum and population No.5 was minimum. The maximum and minimum average of the number of leaf per stem were observed in population No.17 and population No.12, respectively. Maximum and minimum of the leaf length were seen in populations No.10 and No.16, respectively. Population No.4 and population No.22 exhibited the highest and the lowest leaf width, respectively. For inflorescence length/ stem length ratio, population No.6 and population No.21 were showed maximum and minimum, respectively. The maximum number days to stating of flowering and 50% flowering, were seen in populations No.2 and No.8 and populations No.6 and No.4 had minimum of these. Population No.13 and population No.4 exhibited maximum and minimum dry weight, respectively. Populations No.13, No.17, No.18 and No.20 had the maximum of fresh yield and population No.4 had the minimum of fresh yield. For essence value characteristics, the most volume and weight of essential oil was observed in populations No.2, No.9, No.10 and No.18 and the least volume and weight of essential oil was observed in populations No.4, No.5, No.6 and No.12.
Conclusion: ANOVA showed that there was significant difference between thyme accessions for morphological traits which it is important for plant breeding. High variation increases selection of desirable traits for breeding. In order to crossing and hybridization, parents must be genetically distant to gain the most variation. In this study, relationship between thyme accessions using morphological and essence value traits was investigated so plant breeder can use it for production desirable hybrid.

Keywords

• Correlation coefficient
• Essence value
• Morphological characteristics
• Thymus

20.1001.1.20084730.1395.30.3.20.9

References

1- Acquaah G., Adamas M.W., and Kelly, J.D. 1992. A Factor analysis of plant variables associated with architecture and seed size in dry bean. Euphytica, 60(3):171-177.

2- Akbarinia A., Sharifi Ashoorabadi E., and Mirza M. 2010. Study on drug yield and essential oil content and composition of Thymus daenensis Celak. under cultivated condition. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 26(2):205-212.

3- Alamdari S.B.L., Safarnejad A., and Rezaee M. 2011. Evaluation of genetic variation between Thymus accessions using molecular markrs. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(12): 2552-2556.

4- Alamdary S.B.L., Safarnejad A., and Nematzadeh G.A. 2012. Using RAPD marker for genetic diversity assessment of several Thymus species. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 20(2):192-201. (in Persian with English abstract)

5- Asgari F., Sefidkon F., and Rezaei M. 2001. Investigation of quality and quantity of essential oils Changes in T. pubsence at some vegetative point of Lar valley. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 12:87-127.

6- Babaee K., Amini Dehaghi M., Modares Sanavi S.A.M., and Jabbari R. 2010. Water deficit effect on morphology, prolin content and thymol percentage of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 26(2):239-251.

7- Blouri-Moghadam MR., Safarnejad A., and Kazemitabar K. 2011. Genetic diversity assessment in several barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars using microsatellite markers. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 3(2) : 140-144.

8- Daftari Z, and Safarnejad A. 2012. Karyotypic study of four Thymus species (T. pubescens, T. fedtschenkoi, T. daenensis, T. lancifolius). Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 19(2):241-250. (in Persian with English abstract)

9- Gholami B.A., Asgarzadeh M.A., and Zarif Ketabi H. 2007. Investigation of method and planting time of khorasanicum thyme (Thymus transcaspicus) In order to cultivation and domestication and determine the of the active ingredients in Khorasan razavi. Final report of research project, research, education and extension agricultural Organization. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Khorasan razavi.

10- Hajian Shahri M., Zad J., Sharifi Tehrani A., Okhovvat M., and Safarnejad A. 2009. Investigation of genetic variation at Uncinula necator (Schw.) Burr. using molecular marker in Khorasan province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22(1): 49-60.

11- Hashemi H., Safarnejad A. and Bagheri A. 2009. Investigation of genetic variation among Iran’s Persian Zira (Bunium persicum Boiss) landraces using RAPD marker. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 16(2): 239-246. (in Persian with English abstract)

12- Hashemi H., Safarnejad A., and Bagheri A. 2010. The use of RAPD marker for assessing the genetic diversity of Bunium persicum (Boiss.) B. Fedtsch populations. International Journal of Science and Nature, 1(2): 202-208.

13- Hudaib M., and Aburjai T. 2003. Volatile components of Thymus vulgaris L. from wild growing and cultivated plants in Jordan. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 22(4):322-327.

14- Janssen A.M., Scheffer J.J.C., and Baerheim Svendsen A. 1987. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils. A 1976-1986 literature review on possible applications, Pharmacy World & Science, 9(4):193-197.

15- Kermani M., Marashi H., and Safarnejad A. 2009. Investigation of genetic variation within and among two species of Cuminum spp. using AFLP markers. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 16(2): 198-206. (in Persian with English abstract)

16- Kermani M., Marashi H., Nasiri M.R., Safarnejad A., and Shahriari F. 2007. Study of Genetic Variation of Iranian Cumin Lines (Cuminum cyminum) using AFLP markers Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 20(6): 305-312.

17- Mahdavi S. 2005. Investigation of morphological, kariotypic variation and DNA genomic value of some thyme medicinal plant. Master thesis of crop field. Tarbiat Modarres University.

18- Marotti M., Dellacecca V., Piccaglia R., and Glovanelli E. 1993. Agronomic and chemical evaluation of three varieties of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Acta Horticulture, 331:63-69.

19- Naghdiabadi H.A., Yazdani D., Nazari F., and Sajed M.A. 2002. Yield Seasonal changes and the composition of the thyme essential oil (Thymus vulgaris L.) At different planting densities. Medicinal plants, 2(5): 51-56.

20- Ozguven M., and Tansi S. 1998. Drug yield and essential oil of Thymus vulgaris L. as in influenced by ecological and ontogenetical variation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 22:537-542.

21- Omidbeigy R. 1997. Approaches of production and processing of medicinal plants. vollume 2. Publications of Tehran Publication Designers. 400p.

22- Omidbeigy R. 2006. Production and processing of medicinal plants. vollume 2. astane qods razavi. 280p.

23- Pank F. 2007. Breeding of Medicinal Plants.p.417- 447. In Kayser. O. and Quax. J. (Eds.). Medicinal Plant Biotechnology, From Basic Research to Industrial Applications. John and Wiley, 618p.

24- Rechinger K.H. 1982. Flora Iranica. Vol. 152, Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 543-544.

25- Safarnejad A, and Khosravinasab Z. 2011. Cytogenetic study of Cuminum setifolium (Boiss) Kos-Pol as a medicinal plant. International Journal of Science and Nature, 2(1): 105-109.

26- Safarnejad A., Abbasi M., and Tabatabae SM. 2011. Agronomical and botanical characteristics of Cuminum setifolium (Boiss.) Kos.–Pol. A plant with potentially medicinal applications. Notulae Scientia Biologica, 3(1) : 30-35.

27- Yavari A., Nazeri V., Sefidkon F., Zamani Z., and Hasani M. 2012. Investigation of genetic vatiation in between and within sime of azarbayejan thyme populations (Thymus migricus Klokov & Desj-Shost) using rapd markers. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 28: 35-47.