اثر ریز نمونه و سطوح هورمونی بر باززایی مستقیم در رقم محلی خاتونی خربزه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• زهره چنارانی ¹
• فرهاد شکوهی فر ²
• مجتبی ممرآبادی ³

¹ دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

² ‍پژوهشکاه ملی مهندسی ژنتیک و بیو تکنولوژی

³ دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v32i1.48644

چکیده

خربزه گیاهی جالیزی و با ارزش اقتصادی بالا به شمار می‌رود که سطح زیر کشت قابل توجهی را در ایران و استان خراسان به خود اختصاص داده است. بکارگیری تکنیک‌های نوین در سرعت بخشیدن به برنامه‌های اصلاحی می‌تواند در جبران کاستی‌های گذشته نقش مهمی ایفاء نماید. اکوتیپ خاتونی می‌تواند به عنوان رقمی محلی و بازارپسند در برنامه‌های اصلاحی مورد توجه قرار گیرد. در این مطالعه اثر دو فاکتور ریزنمونه و مقادیر مختلف هورمون BAP در محیط کشت با هدف بهینه سازی شرایط باززایی مستقیم در اکوتیپ خاتونی بررسی شد. جوانه‌ی جانبی انتهای برگ‌های لپه‌ای، برگ-های حقیقی و محور زیر لپه در محیط‌های کشت RM1 (حاوی 1/0 میلی‌گرم در لیتر BAP)، RM2 (حاوی 25/0 میلی‌گرم درلیترBAP)، RM3 (حاوی 5/0 میلی‌گرم در لیترBAP)، RM4 (حاوی 75/0 میلی‌گرم در لیترBAP)، RM5 (حاوی 1 میلی‌گرم در لیترBAP) و RM6 (یک تیمار ترکیبی از دو هورمون BAP (5/0 میلی‌گرم در لیتر) و NAA (01/0 میلی‌گرم در لیتر) کشت شدند. ریزنمونه‌ی برگ لپه‌ای در مقایسه با سایر ریز نمونه‌ها باززایی بیشتری نشان داد و القای ساقه‌زایی در محیط کشت با افزایش میزان BAP افزایش یافت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• برگ حقیقی
• برگ لپه ای
• خربزه
• محور زیرلپه
• هورمون BAP

20.1001.1.20084730.1397.32.1.2.1

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study the Effects of Explants and Hormonal Levels onDirect Regeneration in Melon (Cucumis melo L., cv. Khatooni)

نویسندگان [English]

• Zohreh Chenarani ¹
• Farhad Shokouhifar ²
• Mojtaba Mamarabadi ³

¹ Shahrood University of Technology

² National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology

³ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Iran is the third producer of Melon (Cucumismelo L.) after China and Turkey in the World.Melon is one of the main crops in Khorasan province in the term of cultivation area. The cultivar of Khatooni, among many varieties of melon, can be considered as a breeding cultivar because of its great qualitative traits including sweetness and flavor. This cultivar is also economically important and has many attractions for export. However, this cultivar is susceptible to some of plant diseases caused by different bacterial, viral and fungal pathogens which among them vascular wilt caused by Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. melonis (Leach &Currenu) Snyder & Hansen (FOM) is one of the most destructive soil-borne diseases in melon in Iran particularly in temperate and cold regions. The control of melon diseases has depended increasingly on the extensive use of toxic chemicals (pesticides). Many of these chemicals have been shown to be toxic to non-target microorganisms and animals and may be toxic to humans. Another problem with using chemicals to control plant pathogens is that a pathogen may become resistant to the chemicals.
The most promising control approaches are included conventional breeding and genetic engineering of disease-resistant plants. However, the conventional breeding method of melon is very complicated therefore; genetic engineering could be an effective and quick tool for producing new cultivars. In vitro direct regeneration is one of the most crucial step in gene transferring programs (20). In the present study, the effects of explant type and medium were considered in order to optimize the regeneration condition for melon (cv. Khatooni).

Material and Methods: The Khatoonicv.was provided by the Seed Bank of Plant Sciences Research Center from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. The seeds were disinfected by NaClO in 1 % concentration, washed three times by distilled water and cultivated on MS medium (Murashigo and Skoog) for germination. The explant types were; lateral buds of cotyledon and the true leaves and hypocotyls. The selected media were: M1(0.1 mg.l-1 BAP (6-Benzyl amino purine)), M2 (0.25 mg.l-1 BAP), M3 (0.5 mg.l-1 BAP), M4 (0.75 mg.l-1 BAP),M5 (1 mg.l-1 BAP)and M6(including 0.5 mg.l-1 BAP and 0.01 mg.l-1 NAA (1-Naphthalene acetic acid))The experiment was repeated three times. The experimental –was conducted factorial based on completely randomized design and statistical analysis was performed using the SAS and JMP software. The corresponded graphs were drawn by Microsoft excel 2007.

Results and Discussion: The greatest amount of shoot regeneration in cotyledons was observed in M5 with 1 mg.l-1 BAP while minimum shoot regeneration was observed in M1with 0.1 mg.l-1 BAP. Cotyledon leaves showed the best regeneration efficiency among the other evaluated explants as it has also been reported by many other researchers (12, 8, 20, 21, and 2). The observations showed that in all BAP concentration, hypocotyls only formed callus tissue and did not produce any stem. In all three explants (true leaves, cotyledon and hypocotyls) rooting was observed in a treatment combination including 0.5 mg.l-1BAP and 0.01 mg.l-1 NAA 20 days after cultivation while no stem was formed at the same time. In three weeks after exposure , a weak root system was formed on the rooting mediumin without hormonetreatment . In MS medium enriched with 0.01 and 0.05 mg.l-1 NAA an appropriate root system was formed after 8 to 10 days. The medium containing 0.01mg.l-1 NAA was more appropriate for root regeneration (rooting).
Conclusion: Many studies have been shown that, the manipulation of different phytohormones ratio such as auxin and cytokinin in cultural medium is a suitable strategy to manage differentiation and organogenesis programs in plant (9). In the present study, the effects of explant type and medium were investigated in order to optimize the regeneration condition for melon (cv. Khatooni). As a result, in all BAP concentration, hypocotyls only formed callus tissue and did not produce any stem. However, by increasing of BAP hormone concentration in the cultivated media, shoot regeneration will also increase. The result of our study showed that, cotyledon leaves were more effective on shoot regeneration compared to the true leaves and hypocotyls as it has also been reported by other researchers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• BAP
• Cotyledon
• Hypocotyl
• Real leaf

مراجع

1. Abrie A. L., and Van Staden J. 2001. Development of regeneration protocols for selected cucurbit cultivars. Plant Growth Regulation, 35: 263-267.

2. Blackmon W. J., Reynolds B. D., and Postek C. E. 1981. Production of somatic embryos from callused cantaloupe hypocotyl explants. Horticulture Science, 16: 451-451.

3. Chee P. P. 1991. Plant regeneration from cotyledons of Cucumis melo ‘Topmark’. Horticulture Science, 26: 908–910.

4. Compton M. E., Gray D. J., and Gaba V. P. 2004. Use of tissue culture and biotechnology the genetic improvement of watermelon. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 77: 231-243.

5. Curuk S., Elman C., Schlarman E., Sagef O., Shomer I., Cetiner S., Gray D. J., and Gaba V. 2002. A novel pathway for rapid shoot regeneration from the proximal zone of the hypocotyl of melon (Cucumis melo L.). In Vitro Cellular Developmental Biology-Plant, 38: 260– 267.

6. Dirks R., and Buggenum M. V. 1989. In vitro plant regeneration from leaf and cotyledon explants of Cucumis melo L. Plant cell reports, 7: 626-627.

7. FAO Statistics. 2010. available at http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/ (visited 20 July 2016).

8. Gaba V., Elman E., Perl Treves R., and Gray D. J. 1996. A theoretical investigation of the genetic variability in the ability of Agrobacterium to transform Cucumis melo. L. p. 172-178. In Gomez-Guillamon M. L., Soria C., Cuartero J., and Fernandez-Munoz R. (eds). Cucurbits Towards. 2000. Preceding of 6th Eucarpia meeting on Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding, Malaga, Spain.

9. Gaspar T. H., Kevers C., Faivre-Rampant O., Crevecoeur M., Penel C. L., Greppin H., and Dommes J. 2003. Changing concepts in plant hormone action. In Vitro Cellular Developmental Biology-Plant, 39:85-106.

10. Gray D. J., McColley D. W., and Compton M. E. 1993. High-frequency somatic embryogenesis from quiescent seed cotyledons of Cucumis melo cotyledons. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science, 118: 425–432.

11. Kathal R., Bhatnagar S. P., and Bhojwani S. S. 1986. Regeneration of shoots from hypocotyl callus of Cucumis melo cv. Pusa sharbati. Journal of Plant Physiology, 126: 59–62.

12. Kathal R., Bhatnagar S. P., and Bhojwani S. S. 1988. Regeneration of plants from leaf explants of Cucumis melo cv. Pusa Sharbati. Plant Cell Reports, 7: 449–451.

13. Liborio L. C., Januzzi B. M., Stefano S. M. D., and Martinelli A. P. 2001. In vitro morphogenesis of Cucumis melo var. inodorus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 65: 81-89.

14. Melara M. V., and Arias A. M. G. 2009. Effect of BAP and IAA on shoot regeneration in cotyledonary explants of Costa Rican melon genotypes. Agronomia Costarricense, 33: 125-131.

15. Molina R. V., and Nuez F. 1995. Characterization and classification of different genotypes in a population of Cucumis melo based on their ability to regenerate shoots from leaf explants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 43: 249-257.

16. Moreno V., Garcia-Sogo M., Granell I., Garcia-Sogo B., and Roig L. A. 1985. Plant regeneration from calli of melon (Cucumis melo L. cv. Amarillo Oro). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 5: 139-146.

17. Murashige T., and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum, 15: 473–497.

18. Naddaf kheyrabadi M., Lotfi M., Tohidfar M. and Naderi D. 2010. Master thesis in horticultural sciences. Transformation of melon Cucumis melo L. in order to enhance resistant against fungal pathogen. Abureyhan Campus, University of Tehran. Iran. (In Persian with English abstract).

19. Niedz R. P., Smith S. S., Dunbar K. V., Stephens C. T., and Murakishi H. 1989. Factors affecting shoot regeneration from cotyledonary explants of Cucumis melo. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 18: 313–319.

20. Nunez-Palenius H. G., Gomez-Lim M., Ochoa-Alejo N., Grumet R., Lester G. and Cantliffe D. J. 2008. Melon fruits: Genetic diversity, physiology, and biotechnology features. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 28:13-55.

21. Pech J. C., Bernadac A., Bouzayen M., Latche A., Dogimont C. and Pitrat M. 2007. Melon. p. 209- 240. In Pua E. C., and Davey M. R. (eds). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 60 Transgenic Crops V. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

22. Salehi R. and Kashi A. 2010. Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion composition in xylem sap of Iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methods. Horticulture Science, 45: 766-770.

23. Singh M. N., Misra A. K., and Bhatnagar S. P. 1996. In vitro production of plants from cotyledon explants of Cucumis melo L. and their successful transfer to field. Phytomorphology, 46: 395–402.

24. Sobhani A., Bashtini A., Rafezi R., Heydarpoor A., and Gharib M. A. 2015. Khatooni93, A new cultivar of melon for cultivation in tropical and subtropical region. Research Achievements for fields and horticulture crops, 4(1): 117-126. (In Persian with English abstract).

25. Souza F. V. D., Garcia-sogo B., Souza A. S., San-Juan A. P., and Moreno V. 2006. Morphogenetic response of cotyledon and leaf explants melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv. Amarillo Oro. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 49: 21-27.

26. Tabei Y., Kanno T., and Nishio T. 1991. Regulation of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis by auxin in melon, Cucumis melo L. Plant Cell Reports, 10: 225-229.

27. Yadav R. C., Salah M. T., and Grumet R. 1996. High frequency shoot regeneration from leaf explants of muskmelon. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 45: 207–214.