ارزیابی روش‌های کاربرد اسید هیومیک و نسبت‌های ازت بر خصوصیات مورفولوژیکی و عملکرد توت‌فرنگی (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) رقم پاروس

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• ماهرخ رستمی ¹
• علی اکبر شکوهیان ²

¹ دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

² محقق اردبیلی

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v32i2.60673

چکیده

به منظور بررسی تأثیر کودهای شیمیایی ازت و آلی اسید هیومیک بر ویژگی‌های مورفولوژیکی و عملکرد توت‌فرنگی (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) رقم پاروس تحقیقی به‌صورت کرت‌های دوبار خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در طی سال‌های 94-1393 در محوطه دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل سه سطح کود ازت (50، 100 و 150 کیلوگرم در هکتار)، دو روش کاربرد اسید هیومیک (برگی و خاکی) و چهار سطح اسید هیومیک (0، 2، 4 و 6 کیلوگرم در هکتار) بودند. برپایه نتایج به‌دست آمده اثر غلظت‌های مختلف ازت، اسید هیومیک و روش‌های کاربرد آن و اثرات متقابل آن‌ها در اکثر صفات در سطح احتمال پنج درصد از لحاظ آماری معنی‌دار بوده‌اند. بررسی اثر متقابل بین اسید هیومیک و روش‌های کاربرد آن نشان داد که بیشترین مقادیر در صفات تعداد و سطح برگ از کاربرد خاکی 6 کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک در هکتار حاصل شده است. بیشترین تعداد گل و میوه و عملکرد از اثر متقابل ازت و اسید هیومیک در سطح ازت 100 و اسید هیومیک 4 کیلوگرم در هکتار به‌دست آمد. همچنین نتایج اثرات متقابل سه جانبه سطوح اسید هیومیک و روش‌های کاربرد آن و تیمارهای ازت نشان داد که بیشترین مقادیر صفات وزن تر و خشک بخش هوایی و ریشه و حجم ریشه از کاربرد برگی 4 کیلو گرم و برای میانگین وزن تک میوه کاربرد برگی 2 کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک همراه با سطح ازت 100 کیلوگرم در هکتار حاصل شده است. براین‌اساس، بیشترین مقادیر در اکثر صفات مورد بررسی در مصرف ترکیبی سطوح ازت 100 و کاربرد برگی 4 کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک در هکتار مشاهده شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• کاربرد برگی و خاکی
• حجم ریشه
• عملکرد
• وزن تر و خشک

20.1001.1.20084730.1397.32.2.6.7

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Humic Acid Application Methods and Ratios of Nitrogen on Characteristics of Morphological and Yield of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) cv. Paros

نویسندگان [English]

• Mahrokh Rostami ¹
• Ali Akbar Shokouhian ²

¹ University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

²

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Strawberry fruit is soft and has a variety of vitamins, especially vitamin C and minerals. Parus is one of the most important short-day cultivars and suitable for the fresh produce market. Nitrogen is involved in vegetative and reproductive growth of most horticultural crops and excessive use of itdecrease yield and quality of products and increasing pollution of the environment. Humic substances are contained nutrients that improve the soil nutrients and increases the availability of food and therefore plant growth and yield. Studies haveshown that to adding a certain amount ofhumic acid fertilizer with nitrogen can improve the growth of roots, stems and leaves and enhances the yield and quality of products and increases the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer consumption. On this basis, this research was performed aimed at achieving the best combination of treatments of humic acid and its application method and nitrogen in improving strawberry vegetative and reproductive growth cv. Paros.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in the campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Mohaghegh Ardabili at during 2015-2016. In early september, land preparation was carried out, and then were calculated base fertilizers 150 and 50 kg.ha-1 of potassium and phosphorus, respectively plus forty tons per hectare of manure. Stacks was prepared to dimensions of 1.5 × 1 m and the distance of rows was 40 cm. Strawberry seedlings were planted with distance of 25 cm on the row (10plants m-2)in late November.
The experiment was carried out as a split split plot based on complete randomized block design with the application of foliar and soil treatments of Humic acid levels (control, 2, 4 and 6 kg.ha-1) and nitrogen fertilizer (50, 100 and 150 kg.ha-1) with three replications. Nitrogen levels were placed in the main plots and the type of humic acid application in sub plots and humic acid concentrations in the sub- sub plots. Half of N(urea fertilizer) was used at the time of planting and 25 %on the early may and 25 %on the early June. To apply foliar and soil treatments, humic acid was used (Humaster tob with 85% of humic and fulvic acid, Yazd Golsangkavir Company) with the start of the growing season at the intervals of every 10 days once (four times total). In the soil method, humic acid is measured based on the desired treatments and then dissolved with deionized water and added to irrigation water. In the foliar method, after irrigation thehumic acid powder was solutioned with a certain amount of deionized water and it was sprayed on the plants in equal measure. In addition, only irrigation water and deodorizing water were applied to the control of soil and foliar treatments, respectively. Traits were as: leaf number and area, number of runners, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, root volume, number of flowers and fruits, fruit weight average and yield per plant. Data analysis were performed by using SAS 9.1 and comparison of data by the LSD test at the 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion: All results due to different concentrations of nitrogen, humic acid and methods of its application and their interaction on most traits were significant at 5% probability level. The highest values in the leaf number (17.91) and area (1304.34 cm2) obtained in 6 kg.ha-1 drench application of humic acid. Also,the most number of flowers (13.27) was observed in 100 kgN.ha-1combined with foliar application of humic acid and the highest number of runners (22.34) was obtainedin 150 kgN.ha-1with drench application of humic acid. The most flowers (17.55), fruits (14.5) number and yield (104.43 g.plant-1) observed in 100 kgN.ha-1with 4 kg.ha-1humicacid. The results trilateral interactions of nitrogen,humic acid and application methods showed that the highest values of fresh weight (48.32 g.plant-1) and volume (44.13 cm3.plant-1) of root, dry weight of shoot (21.08 g.plant-1) and root (16.28 g.plant-1) obtained infoliar application of 4 kg.ha-1humic acid.The most of shoot fresh weight (77.7 g.plant-1) also observed in drench application of 4 kg.ha-1humic acid and highestfruit weight average (11.68 g) obtained in foliar application of 2 kg.ha-1humic acid with 100 kgN.ha-1.
Conclusion: Results showed that the majority of evaluated traits, the highest values have been achieved of 100 kgN.ha-1with foliar application of 4 kg.ha-1humic acid. On this basis, combined application of chemical and biological fertilizers can be the best strategy to achieve sustainable agriculture and reducing the pollution of soil and water resources along with increasing the product.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Foliar and drench application
• Moisture and dry weight
• Root volume
• yield

مراجع

1-Abbas T., Ahmad S., Ashraf M., Adnan Shahid M., Yasin M., and Mukhtar Balal R. 2013. Effect of humic and application at different growth stages of kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata blanco) on the basis of physio-biochemical and reproductive responses. Academia Journal of Biotechnology, 1 (1): PP. 014 -020.

2-Aman S., and Rab A. 2013. Response of tomato to nitrogen levels with or without humic acid. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 29 (2): PP. 181-186.

3-Aminifard M. H., Aroiee H., Fatemi H., Ameri, A. and Karimpour S. 2010. Responses of eggplant (Solanum melongenal L.) to different rates of nitrogen under field conditions. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 11 (4): PP. 453-458.

4-Arancon N.Q., Lee S., Edwards C.A., and Atiyeh R. 2003. Effects of humic acids derived from cattleˏ food and paper-waste vermicomposts on growth of greenhouse plants. Pedobiologia, 47: PP. 741-744.

5-Cantliffe D. J., Castellanos J. Z., Paranjpe A. V. 2007. Yield and quality of greenhouse-green strawberries as affected by nitrogen level in Coco Coir and Pine Bark media. Proceedings of the Florida State horticultural Society, 120: PP. 157-161.

6-Chen Y., and Aviad T. 1990. Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: MacCarthy, p., Clapp, C.E., Malcom, R.L., Bloom, P.R. (Eds.), Humic Substances in Soils and Crop Science: Selected Readings. Soil Science Society of America,Madison, PP. 161-186.

7-Denre M., Bandopadhyay P. K., Chakravarty A., Pal S., and Bhattacharya, A. 2014. Effect of foliar application of humic acid, zinc and boron on biochemical changes related to productivity of pungent pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). African Journal of Plant Science, 8 (6): PP. 320-335.

8-Ehsan S., Javed S., Saleem I., Habib F., and Majeed T. 2014. Effect of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizers management on wheat yield. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 4 (4): PP. 28-33.

9-El -Sayed Hameda E.A., Saif El Dean A., Ezzat S., and El Morsy A.H.A. 2011. Responses of productivity and quality of sweet potato to phosphorus fertilizer rates and application methods of the humic acid. International Research Jounal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 1:383-393.

10-El-Nemr M. A., El-Desuki M., El-Bassiony A. M., and Fawzy Z. F. 2012. Response of Growth and Yield of Cucumber Plants (Cucumis sativus L.) to Different Foliar Applications of Humic Acid and Bio-stimulators. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(3): PP. 630-637.

11-Eshghi S., and Garazhian M. 2015. Improving growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry by foliar and soil drench applications of humicacid. Iran Agricultural Research, 34(1): P. 14-20.

12-Flachowsky H., Hofer M., and Hanke M. V. 2011. Strawbrry. Fruit Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology, 5 (1): PP. 8 -26.

13-Ganjehi B., and Golchin A. 2011. The effect of different levels of nitrogen, potassium and magnesium on yield and growth indices of strawberry in hydroponic culture. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 2(8): PP. 71 -80. (In Persian).

14-Hosseini Farahi M., Aboutalebi A., Eshghi S., Dastyaran M., and Yosefi F. 2013. Foliar application of humic acid on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ˏAromasˏstrawberry in soilless culture. Agricultural Communications, 1 (1): PP. 13-16.

15-Hummer K., Nathewet P., and Yanagi, T. 2009. Decaploidy in Fragaria iturupensis (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 96(3): PP. 713 -716.

16-Kandil A. A., Sharief A. E., and Fathalla F. H. 2013. Onion yield as affected by foliar application with amino and humic acids under nitrogen fertilizer levels. Esci Journal of Crop Production, 02 (02): PP. 62-72.

17-Kashi A., and Hekmati J. 1991. Growing strawberries. Publications Tehran, P. 121. (In Persian).

18-Khan A., Muhammad Shah S. N., Rab A., Sajid M., Ali K., Ahmed A., and et al. 2014. Influence of nitrogen and potassium levels on growth and yield of chillies (Capsicum annuum L.). International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 3 (3): P. 260.

19-Moraditochaee M. 2012. Effectsof Humic Acid Folior Sprayingand Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7(4): PP. 289 -293.

20-Pilanali, N., & Kaplan, M. 2003. Investigation of effects on nutrient uptake of humic acid applications of different forms to strawberry plant. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26 (40): PP. 835-843.

21-Rahimian B. A., Shirmohammadi E., Geikloo A. 2014. Effect of Humic Acid Application on Qualitative Characteristic and Micronutrient Status in Petunia hybrid L. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 3 (9):PP. 15 -19.

22-Sarhan T. Z., Mohammad G. H., and Teli J. A. 2011. Effects of humic acid and bread yeast on growth and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, B. 1: PP. 1091-1096.

23-Shirzad S., Arooie H., Sharifzade K., and Dalirimoghadam R. 2012. Responses of Productivity and Quality of Cucumber to Application of the Two Bio -Fertilizers (Humic Acid and Nitroxin) in Fall Planting. Agricultural Journal, 7 (6): PP. 401 -404.

24-SubhiRostami F., and Golchin A. 2011. Effect of different amounts of nitrogen, manganese and zinc on yield and fruit quality of pomegranate fruit in Mazandaran. Journal of Science Horticulture (Agricultural Sciences and Technology), 25(2): PP. 234 -242. (In Persian).

25-Tai-bo C., Zhen-lin W., Lan-ian L., Ru-Juan W., Xiao-guang C., and Xiao-dong Z. 2007. Effects of humic acid urea on yield and nitrogen absorption, assimilation and quality of ginger. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 13 (5): PP. 903.

26-Varanini Z., and Pinton R. 1995. Humic substances and plant nutrition. Progress in Botany. 56: PP. 97-117

27-Yildirim E. 2007. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 57: PP. 182-186.

28-Zeinali A., and Moradi P. 2015. The Effects of Humic Acid and Ammonium Sulfate Foliar Spraying and Their Interaction Effects on the Qualitative and Quantitative Yield of Native Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 4(12S): P. 205-211.