with the collaboration of Iranian Scientific Association for Landscape (ISAL)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran

2 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of Agriculture, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Since Iran is one of the arid and semi-arid regions of the world and due to the great importance of water in agriculture, it is very important to conduct research to improve drought stress in order to produce more quality products. In this regard, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of mycorrhiza species on some morphological and physiological characteristics of peach seedlings under drought stress. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi coexist with the roots of various plants and have a broad effect on their growth. These fungus are effective in the initial establishment of the plant under drought conditions. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases plant resistance to dehydration by increasing growth and uptake of nutrients, especially phosphorus.
 
Matherials and Methods
In order to investigate the effect of three species of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some vegetative characteristics and phosphorus absorption of peach seedlings under drought stress conditions, a factorial experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with four replications. The experimental factors included: drought stress at four levels (100, 80, 60 and 40 percent of field capacity) and the second factor application of mycorrhizal fungus at four levels: application of three species of mycorrhiza fungi and three species of fungi, each in three concentration (75, 100, 125 g in a pot) with chemical fertilizer (100 g triple super phosphate for each pot) and fertilizer (without mycorrhiza) and control (without fertilizer and mycorrhiza). The measurements were comprised root traits, stem diameter, vegetative growth of branches, leaf area index, vegetation index, relative leaf water content, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf electrolyte leakage, leaf phosphorus and colonization root percent.
 
Results and Discussion
Result showed that application of mycorrhizal fungi seems to be effective in reducing the effects of dehydration stress. The use of these fungi had a positive effect on reducing leaf electrolyte leakage under severe dehydration. According to the results obtained in this experiment, the highest efficiency in drought stress conditions was observed in G. mosseae and G. intraradices. Under drought stress conditions, the lowest values of root volume, greenness index, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf electrolyte leakage, root colonization and leaf phosphorus content were observed. With increasing of drought stress, all of the mentioned traits reduced and mycorrhiza fungi had a positive significant effect on all studied traits. In this study, it was found that with increasing stress intensity, the traits were negatively affected and led to irreparable damage to the product. Therefore, it is expected that by preventing or minimizing the effects of stress, an effective step was taken to increase performance. The significant decrease in root colonization with increasing stress is probably due to the decrease in the growth of hyphae. The most important step after spore germination is the growth of hyphae resulting from germination, which plays an essential role in root colonization. Apparently, hyphae growth is more affected by osmotic potential than spore growth. The results obtained from this research showed that the roots of peach seedlings have significant symbiosis potential with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Peymaneh & Zarei, 2013). According to Miyashita et al. (2005) Leaf photosynthesis activity can be used as a useful tool for classification of drought tolerant plants. Sajjadinia et al. (2010) regarding the relative water content and photosynthesis of several pistachio cultivars reported high correlation and high diversity in different stages and cultivars and stated that the decrease in relative water content strongly reduces transpiration, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, which our results are consistent. With the escalation of tension, the greenness index also decreased; So that in the conditions of severe stress (40% of crop capacity), the amount of greenness index reached the lowest value. In the conditions of severe stress due to interruption of continuous irrigation, the plants entered from the stage of mild stress to the stage of severe dry stress, which seems that under these conditions, the decrease in the concentration of chlorophyll, in addition to the decrease in the amount of synthesis, is caused by the decomposition of chlorophyll due to the increase in the amount chlorophyllase, peroxidase and phenolic compounds. According to Schutz and Fangmier (2001), the decrease in the amount of chlorophyll in stress conditions is related to the increase in the production of oxygen radicals in the cell. These free radicals cause peroxidation and as a result the decomposition of this pigment. The greenness index is considered one of the most important growth parameters, which is reduced by drought stress conditions, and the results indicate that the treatment of mycorrhizal fungi in all three types of inoculated mushrooms has improved the greenness index and the adverse effects It has removed the drought stress to a great extent (Figure 6), which can be attributed to the improvement of water and food absorption by mycorrhizal roots (Larsson et al., 2008).
 
Conclusion
 In general, this study showed that the best treatment related to the mycorrizha fungi was mosseae, which had the most effect on reducing the negative effects of stress

Keywords

Main Subjects

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Aghababaei, F., Raisey, F., & Nadyan, H. (2011). Influence of mycorrhizal symbiosis on the uptake of nutrients in some commercial genotypes of almond in a sandy loam soil. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 25(2), 137 - 147. (In Persian)
  2. Alcamo, J., Henrichs, T., & Rosch, T. (2000). World water in 2025-global modeling and scenario analysis for the world commission on water for the 21st century. Center for environmental systems research, Univ. Kassel, Kurt Wolters Strasse, 3, 34-109.
  3. Auge, R.M., Stodola, A.J.W., & Tims, J.E. (2001). Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant and Soil, 230, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004891210871
  4. Barranco, D., Ruiz, N., & Gomez-del-Campo, M. (2005). Frost tolerance of eight olive cultivars. HortScience, 40, 558-560. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.558
  5. Candar-Cakir, B., Arican, E., & Zhang, B. (2016). Small RNA and degradome deep sequencing reveals drought-and tissue-specific micrornas and their important roles in drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant tomato genotypes. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14, 1727-1746. https://doi.org/1111/pbi.12533
  6. Deepika, S., & Kothamasi, D. (2015). Soil moisture-a regulator of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community assembly and symbiotic phosphorus uptake. Mycorrhiza, 25(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-014-0596-1
  7. Ducic, T., Berthold, D., Heyser, R.L.F., & Polle, A. (2009). Mycorrhizal communities in relation to biomass production and nutrient use efficiency in two varieties of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Menziesii and var. glauca) in different forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 742-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.013
  8. Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Müller, C., Frieler, K., Konzmann, M., & Gerten, D. (2014). Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3239–3244. https://doi.org/1073/pnas.1222474110
  9. Eydizadeh, K., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Sabahi, H., & Soufizadeh, S. (2010). Effects of integrated application of biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) in Shoushtar. Agroecology, 2(2), 292-301. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V2I2.7636
  10. Hafez, O.M., Saleh, M.A., & El-Lethy, S.R. (2013). Response of some seedlings olive cultivars to foliar spray of yeast and garlic extracts with or without vascular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24, 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.09.13271
  11. Haghighatnia, H, Nadian, H., Rejali, F., & Tavakoli, O.R. (2012). Effect of two species of Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal fungi on vegetative growth and phosphorous uptake of Mexican lime rootstock (Citrus aurantifolia) under drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 2-28(4), 401-417. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/SPPJ.2017.110486
  12. Hung, S.H., Yu, C.W., & Lin, C.H. (2005). Hydrogen peroxide functions as a stress signal in plants. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 46, 1-10.
  13. Jalili Marandi, R. (2008). Physiology of Environmental Tensions and Resistance Mechanisms in Garden Plants. Jahad Daneshgahi Press. Vol. 1-636 p. (In Persian)
  14. Larsson, E.H., Bornman, J.F., & Asp H. (2008). Influence of UV-B radiation and CO2+ on chlorophyll fluorescence, growth and nutrient content in Brassica napus. Journal of Experimental Botany, 149, 1031-1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/49.323.1031
  15. Losciale, P., Zibordi, M., Manfrini, L., Morandi, B., Bastias, R.M., & Corelli Grappadelli, L. (2011). Light management and photoinactivation under drought stress in Peach. Acta Horticulturae, 922, 341-348. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.922.44
  16. Miyashita, K., Tanakamaru, S., Maitani, T., & Kimura, K. (2005). Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53, 205-214. https://doi.org/1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.015
  17. Ortas, I. (2012). Mycorrhiza in Citrus: Growth and Nutrition. In Advances in Citrus Nutrition; Sirivastava, A.K., Ed.; Springer: Dorderecht, The Netherlands 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4171-3_23
  18. Parniske, M. (2008). Arbuscular Mycorrhiza: The mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6, 763-775. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1987
  19. Petropoulos, S.A., Dimitra, D., Polissiou, M.G., & Passam, H.C. (2008). The effect of water deficit stress on the growth, yield and composition of essential oils of parsley. Scientia Horticulturae, 115, 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.008
  20. Peymaneh, Z., & Zarei, M. (2013). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and absorption of nutrients of orange base in dehydrated conditions. Journal of Soil Biology, 1(1), 24-13. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/22092/SBJ.2013.120917
  21. Razouk, R., Ibijbijen, J., Kajji, A., & El Hafa, H. (2015). Alleviation of drought stress of young peach (Prunus persica) trees by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Research & Reviews in BioSciences, 10(6), 199-209.
  22. Rich, T.E. (1998). Endomycorrhizal fungal survival in continuous corn, soybean and fallow. Agronomy Journal, 95(1), 224-230. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.2240
  23. Sajjadinia, A., Ershadi, A., Hokmabadi, H., Khayyat, M., & Gholami, M. (2010). Gas exchange activities and relative water content at different fruit growth and developmental stages of on and off cultivated pistachio trees. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1, 1-6.
  24. Schutz, H., & Fangmier, E. (2001). Growth and yield responses of spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Minaret) to elevated CO2 and water limitation. Environmental Pollution, 114, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00215-3
  25. Sikes, B.A., Cottenie K., & Klironimos, J.N. (2009). Plant and fungal identity determines pathogen production of plant roots by arbuscular mycorrhizals. Journal of Ecology, 97, 1274-1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01557.x
  26. Smith, S.E., & Read, D.J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, third cd. Academic press, London, Uk.
  27. Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a midified line intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology, 63, 995-1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258617
  28. Tian, M., Chen, Y.L., Li, M., & Liu, R.J. (2013). Structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhiza: a review. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 24(8), 2369-2376.
  29. Turk, M.A., Assaf, T.A., Hameed, K.M., & Tawaha, A.M. (2006). Significance of mycorrhizae. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2, 16-20.
  30. Turner, N.C. (1981). Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant waer status. Plant and Soil, 58, 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180062

 

CAPTCHA Image