The Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in Hydroponics Cultivation Conditions on Iron Concentration, Yield and Phenolic Compounds of Lettuce

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Parastoo Molaei ¹
• Fatemeh Nekounam ¹
• Mohammad BabaAkbari Sari ²

¹ Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

² Department of Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2024.82408.1266

Abstract

Introduction
 Over time, water deficit and environmental pollution by traditional agriculture that forces the producer to contribute to competitive and sustainable agriculture. Leafy vegetables are beneficial to human health, therefore, to adapt an eco-friendly approach in some vegetables, the partial substitution (25–50%) of mineral NPK by biofertilizers in lettuce improves the yield and agronomic features and produces healthy plants for human nutrition as well. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) from Asteraceae family is considered as one of the most popular salad vegetables as a cool season crop. PGPB (Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria) are rhizosphere bacteria that improve plant growth through a broad range of processes, i.e., phosphate solubilization, biological nitrogen fixation, siderophore manufacturing, phytohormone manufacturing, antifungal activity, systemic resistance induction and plant-microbe symbiosis promotion. The promoting of growth and yield of horticultural crops such as cucumber, potato, tomato and spinach by plant growth promoting bacteria inoculation at nutrient solutions under soilless systems have also been reported.
 
Material and Methods
 In order to study the effect of growth-promoting bacteria on the yield, iron concentration and phenolic compounds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. New Red Fire) under floating systems, the experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design with three replications in the Research greenhouse of University of Zanjan, during 2020. Experiment treatments consisted of five levels of PGPB (Pseudomonas vancouverensis, Pseudomonas koreensis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas putida, and one level of combined bacteria (Pantoea agglomerans+ Pseudomonas koreensis + Pseudomonas putida+ Pseudomonas vancouverensis)) and control plant (without bacteria treated). Application of bacteria was done in two stages, one step before cultivation as seed inoculation and the next step as root inoculation. Lettuce plants grown in hydroculture condition with Hoagland nutrient solution. Growth conditions were environmentally controlled at a relative humidity of 60/70 % day/night and temperature was maintained between 20 and 17 °C. At 40 days after transplanting date, the lettuce head were harvested. The freshly harvested lettuce head were immediately weighed separately of each plant for fresh weight determination. Leaf samples were dried at 72 °C for 48 h in a drying oven and kept for further investigations. Also, leaf number per plant, chlorophyll and carotenoids contents, Fe concentration, total phenol, total flavonoids and anthocyanin contents were measured.
 
 
Results
The obtained results in the current study indicated that the application of PGPB on lettuce caused significant increase in growth, photosynthetic pigments and iron concentration. The maximum growth rate and photosynthetic pigments content was observed in combined four bacteria treatment, so that, an increase of 388.2% chlorophyll a, 439.8% chlorophyll b, 398.3% total chlorophyll, 246.3% carotenoids contents, 42.6% plant fresh weight and 22.2% number of leaves was obtained compared to control plants. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) can enhance growth and development of plants. PGPB have direct and indirect influences on plant growth process. The immediate promotion of growth involves either supplying the plant with a compound produced by the bacteria, i.e., phytohormones, or promoting certain nutrient uptake from the setting. Whereas, the indirect plant growth promotion happens when PGPB decreases or prevents the deleterious impacts of one or more phytopathogenic species. Plants inoculated with PGPB showed higher leaf iron concentration compared to control plant. Thus inoculation with combined four bacteria induced a 26.2 % increase of lettuce leaves iron concentration. The obtained results in the current study revealed that the inoculation with PGPB significant decreased the total phenol, flavonoid and anthocyanin contents. The maximum content of phenol (483 µg g^-1FW), flavonoid (188.1 µg g^-1FW) and anthocyanin (27.5 µmol g^-1FW) were observed in control plants compared to treated plants.
 
Conclusion
 According to the results of this research, the use of PGPB in the hydroculture system, on the one hand, led to a significant increase in iron absorption, the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, and subsequently promote growth and increases lettuce yield. On the other hand, due to facilitating the growth conditions and increasing the absorption of nutrients for the host plants as a result of inoculation with PGPB, led to a decreases of phenolic compounds including total phenol, total flavonoid and anthocyanin contents.
 

Keywords

• Anthocyanin
• Hydroponics
• Iron
• PGPR
• Phenolic compounds

Main Subjects

• Growing vegetables

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

1. Abdollahi, S., Golchin, A., & Shahryari, F. (2020). Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on organic acids production and concentration of lead and cadmium in cabbage. Journal of Water and Soil, 34(3), 737-754. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v34i3.85068
2. Alipour, Z.T., & Sobhanipour, A. (2012). The effect of Thiobacillus and Pseudomonas fluorescent inoculation on maize growth, and Fe uptake. Annals of Biological Research, 3(3), 1661-1666.
3. Arnon, A.N. (1967). Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 23, 112-21.
4. Bannister, J.V., Bannister, W.H., & Rotills, G. (1987). Aspects of the structure, function and application of superoxide dismutase. CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry, 22, 111-180. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238709083738
5. Biswas, J.C., Ladha, J.K., Dazzo, F.B., Yanni, Y.G., & Rolfe, B.G. (2013). Rhizobial inoculation influences seedling vigor and yield of rice. Agronomy Journal, 92, 880-886. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925880x
6. Bolhasani, Z., Ronaghi, A.M., Ghasemi, R., & Zarei, M. (2020). Influence of growth promoting rhizobacteria and organic matter on the concentration of micronutrients of spinach in a calcareous soil affected by salinity. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 34(1), 81-94. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/ijsr.2020.122143
7. Cézard, C., Farvacques, N., & Sonnet, P. (2015). Chemistry and biology of pyoverdines, Pseudomonas primary siderophores. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 22(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666141011194624
8. Chishaki, N., & Horiguchi, T. (1997). Responses of secondary metabolism to nutrient deficiency. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 43, 987-991.
9. Cunrath, O., Gasser, V., Hoegy, F., Reimmann, C., Guillon, L., & Schalk, I.J. (2015). A cell biological view of the siderophore pyochelin iron uptake pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environmental Microbiology, 17(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12544
10. Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Li, X., Sun, Z., Liao, Y., Xia, X., Zhou, Y., Shi, K., & Yu, J. (2014). Effects of Fusarium oxysporum on rhizosphere microbial communities of two cucumber genotypes with contrasting Fusarium wilt resistance under hydroponic condition. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 140(4), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0494-6
11. Erturk, Y., Cakmakci, R., Duyar, O., & Turan, M. (2011). The effects of plant growth promoting rhizibacteria on vegetative growth and leaf nutrient contents of hazelnut seedling (Turkish hazelnut CV. Tombul and Sivir). International Journal of Soil Science, 6(3), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijss.2011.188.198
12. Esnaashari, E., & Enteshari, S. (2018). Effects of iron chloride, iron chelate and nano-iron on enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms in melissa officinalis under aluminum treatment. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 7(23), 193-204. (In Persian with English abstract)
13. Esitken, A., Yildiz, H.E., Ercisli, S., Donmez, M.F., Turan, M., & Gunes, A. (2010). Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 124, 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.12.012
14. Fathi Amirkhiz, K., Amini Dehaghi, M., & Heshmati, S. (2015). Study the effect of iron chelate on Chlorophyll content, photochemical efficiency and some biochemical traits in Safflower under deficit irrigation condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 46(1), 137-145. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2015.54053
15. Ferreira, J., Cornacchione, M., Liu, X., & Suarez, D. (2015). Nutrient composition, forage parameters, and antioxidant capacity of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in response to saline irrigation water. Journal of Agriculture, 5, 577-597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030577
16. Ghadamkhani, A., Enayatizamir, N., & Norouzi Masir, M. (2017). Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on soil available iron and its uptake by wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 8(2), 53-64. (In Persian)
17. Gheshlaghi, Z., Khorassani, R., Kafi, M., & Fotovat, A. (2019). Comparison of foliar and soil Fe fertilization on medicago scutellata physiological-biochemical characteristics and active iron in soils containing different amounts of lime. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 9(4), 113-128. (In Persian)
18. Gupta, A., Gopal, M., Thomas, G.V., Manikandan, V., Gajewski, J., Thomas, G., Seshagiri, S., Schuster, S.C., Rajesh, P., & Gupta, R. (2014). Whole genome sequencing and analysis of plant growth promoting bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of plantation crops coconut, cocoa and arecanut. PLoS One, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104259
19. Hansch, R., & Mendel, R.R. (2009). Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, and Cl). Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006
20. Hoagland, D.R., & Arnon, D.I. (1950). The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular, 347, 39.
21. Kallala, N., Wissal, M., Jelali, K., Kais, Z., & Mhadhbi, H. (2018). Inoculation with efficient nitrogen fixing and indoleacetic acid producing bacterial microsymbiont enhance tolerance of the model legume Medicago truncatula to iron deficiency. Biomedicine Research International, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155%2F2018%2F9134716
22. Khoo, H., Azlan, A., Tang, S., & Lim, S. (2017). Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients and the potential health benefits. Foodand Nutrition Research, 61(1), 1361779. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F16546628.2017.1361779
23. Kiani Chalmardi, Z., Abdolzadeh, A., & Sadeghipour, H.R. (2012). Evaluation of the effects of silicon nutrition on alleviation of iron deficiency in rice plants (Oriza sativa) with emphasis on growth and antioxidant enzymes activity. Journal of Plant Biology, 4(14), 61-74. (In Persian with English abstract)
24. Kim, M.J., Moon, Y., Kopsell, D.A., Park, S., Tou, J.C., & Waterland, N.L. (2016). Nutritional value of Crisphead ‘Iceberg’ and Romaine lettuces (Lactuca sativa). Journal of Agricultural Science, 8(11), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v8n11p1
25. Kobayashi, T., & Nishizawa, N.K. (2012). Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63, 131-152. https://doi.org/1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105522
26. Kumar, P.G., Suseelendra, D., Amalraj, E.L.D., & Reddy, G. (2015). Isolation of fluorescent Pseudomonas from diverse agro-ecosystems of India and characterization of their PGPR traits. Journal of Bacteriology, 5, 13-24.
27. Lee, S., Ahn, I., Sim, S., Lee, S., Seo, M., Kim, S., Park, S., Lee, Y., & Kang, S. (2010). Pseudomonas LSW25R, antagonistic to plant pathogens, promoted plant growth, and reduced blossom-end rot of tomato fruits in a hydroponic system. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9514-3
28. Liu, D., Yang, Q., Ge, K., Hu, X., Qi, G., Du, B., Liu, K., & Ding, Y. (2017). Promotion of iron nutrition and growth on peanut by Paenibacillus illinoisensis and Bacillus strains in calcareous soil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.006
29. Lommen, W.J.M. (2007). The canon of potato science: 27. Hydroponics. European Potato Journal, 50, 3-4.
30. Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology- Nature, 63(1).
31. Mahfouz, S.A., & Sharaf- Eldin, A. (2007). Effect of mineral vs. biofertilizer on growth, yield and essential oil content of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). International Agrophysics, 2, 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-987419
32. Manzocco, L., Foschia, M., Tomasi, N., Maifreni, M., Costa, L.D., Marino, M., Cortella, G., & Cesco, S. (2011). Influence of hydroponic and soil cultivation on quality and shelf life of ready-to-eat lamb’s lettuce (Valerianella locusta Laterr). Journal of the Scienceof Food and Agriculture, 91, 1373-1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4313
33. Mishra, P.K., Bisht, S.C., Ruwari, P., Joshi, G.K., Singh, G., Bisht, J.K., & Bhatt, J.C. (2011). Bioassociative effect of cold tolerant Pseudomonas and Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 on iron acquisition, nutrient uptake and growth of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). European Journal of Soil Biology, 47, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.005
34. Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D., & Sreekanth, T.V.M. (2010). Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 8(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8
35. Rahi, A. (2016). Effect of supernitroplas and biosuprophosphate biofertilizers on morphological and physiological traits of basil (Ocimum basilicum). Science and Technology of Greenhouse Cultivation, 7(26), 135-125. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ejgcst.7.2.125
36. Rana, A., Saharan, B., Nain, L., Prasanna, R., & Shivay, Y.S. (2012). Enhancing micronutrient uptake and yield of wheat through bacterial PGPR consortia. Soil science and Plant Nutrition, 58(5), 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.716750
37. Ramesh, A., Sharma, S.K., Sharma, M.P., Yadav, N., & Joshi, O.P. (2014). Plant growth-promoting traits in Enterobacter cloacae dissolvens MDSR9 isolated from soybean rhizosphere and its impact on growth and nutrition of soybean and wheat upon inoculation. Agricultural Research, 3(1), 53-66.
38. Saboora, A., & Behjati, R. (2017). The effect of boron and iron deficiency on the contents of photosynthetic pigments, carbohydrates and phenolic compounds in two cultivars of Sorghum bicolor Iranian Journal of Plant Biology, 9(3), 18-38. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22108/ijpb.2017.103432.1015
39. Sharma, A., Shankhdar, D., & Shankhdhar, S.C. (2013). Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Plant and Soil Environment, 59, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.17221/683/2012-PSE
40. Singh, J.S., Pandey, V.C., & Singh, D.P. (2011). Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment, 140, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.017
41. Sonald, S.F., & Laima, S.K. (1999). Phenolics and cold tolerance of brassica napus. Journal of Plant Agriculture, 1-5.
42. Stegelmeier, A.A., Rose, D.M., Joris, B.R., & Glick, B.R. (2022). The use of PGPB to promote plant hydroponic growth. Plants, 11, 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202783
43. Sun, C., Wu, T., Zhai, L., Li, D., Zhang, X., Xu, X., Ma, H., Wang, Y., & Han, Z. (2016). Reactive oxygen species function to mediate the Fe deficiency response in a Fe-efficient apple genotype: an early response mechanism for enhancing reactive oxygen production. Frontier in Plant Science, 7, 1726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01726
44. Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant Physiology (5th Ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
45. Tsavkelova, E.A., Cherdyntseva, T.A., & Netrusoe, A.I. (2005). Auxin production by bacteria associated with orchod roots. Microbiology, 74, 233-273.
46. Turan, M., Ekinci, M., Yildirim, E., Güneş, A., Karagöz, K., Kotan, R., & Dursun, A. (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improved growth, nutrient, and hormone content of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) seedlings. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38, 327-333. https://doi.org/3906/tar-1308-62
47. Wagner, G.J. (1979). Content and vacuole/ extra vacuole distribution of neutral sugars, free amino acids and anthocyanins in protoplasts. Plant Physiology, 64, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1104%2Fpp.64.1.88
48. Widodo, B., Broadley, M.R., & Rose, T. (2010). Response to zinc deficiency of two lines with contrasting tolerance is determined by root growth maintenance and organic acid exudation rates and not by zinc-transporter activity. New Phytologist, 186, 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03177.x
49. Yasufumi, U., & Kaneaki, H. (2003). Selection of PGPR which promotes the growth of spinach. Japanese Journal of Soil Scienceand Plant Nutrition, 74, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.20710/dojo.74.2_157
50. Zandi, P., & Basu, S.K. (2016). Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as bioFertilizers in stabilizing agricultural ecosystems. Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture, 71-87.
51. Zeinali Bafghi, M., Gholamnezhad, J., Esmaeilzadeh-Hosseini, A.R., Shirmardi, M., & Jafari, A. (2020). Influence of gowth promoting bacteria on gowth and physiological characters of pistachio in saline soils. Horticultural Plants Nutriton, 2(2), 107-129. (In Persian with English abstract)
52. Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T., & Jianming, W. (1999). The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry, 64, 555-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2