Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali e asr university, Rafsanjan, Iran

2 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

3 Department of Genetics and Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress in tomatoes reduces fruit quality and yield, also fall leaves and cause of blossom rot. It has been reported that drought stress reduces cell division and causes the stomata to close, followed by a decrease in the flow of carbon dioxide to the mesophyll cells of the leaf. Several methods have been proposed to overcome the drought stress in tomato plants, which can be mentioned the use of drought tolerance genotypes, genetic engineering to identify drought resistant genes and transfer them to sensitive plants, as well as the use of tolerancet rootstocks. It has reported that type of rootstock can effected on tolerance of tomato plants to drought stress. For this reason, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of wild eggplant rootstock on the drought tolerance of two tomato cultivars.
 
Material and Methods
In order to find the effect of the wild eggplant rootstock on the tolerance of two tomato cultivars, a factorial experiment was conducted as completely randomized design with two factors. Factors were included irrigation period three levels of 3 (control), 6 and 9-day and grafting combination at 6 levels involved non-grafted Dafnis, non-grafted Isabella, self-grafted Dafnis, self grafting Isabella, Isabella grafted on wild eggplant rootstock (S. torvum), and Dafnis grafted on wild eggplant rootstock. The plants were exposed to drought for 54 days. At the end of experiment growth and physiological parmeters including leaf specific, plant height dry weight of shoot as well as photosynthesis parameters, RWC and plant nutrients were measured. The amount of leaf proline was measured according to Paquin and Lichasur methodusing a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 515 nm. The phenolic compounds of the leaves were measured at a wavelength of 725 nm using a spectrophotometer (Isfendiyaroglu and Zeker, 2002). Also, the membrane stability index (ion leakage percentage) was measured according to Lutts et al.'s method (Lutts et al., 1996).
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that with increasing irrigation period decreased the most of vegetative parameters, photosynthesis pigments, and mineral nutrients, so that, the highest value was showed at the 3-day irrigation period and the lowest value was at the 9-day irrigation period. Shoot weight decrese is probably due to morphological changes in plant roots, which is a plant response to drought stress. The results also showed that the interaction of irrigation period and grafted combination on some vegetative and ecophysiological parameters was significant. The lowest dry weight of shoot was observed at 9-day of irrigation period in plants of Dafnis grafted on torvum rootstock., Tthe highest dry weight root volume, leaf potassium and phosphorous concentration were at the 3-day irrigation period in self-grafted Dafnis plants.The results also showed that the amount of phenolic compounds in plants of Isabella grafted on torvum rootstock was the highest in 9 days irrigation period which may be due to the rootstock effect on the synthesis of these compounds in the scion. According to the results, the concentration of leaf magnesium in non-grafted plants increased with the increase of the irrigation cycle from 3 days to 9 days, althougth no significant difference was observed between self-grafted and non-grafted plants. In the 9-day irrigation period, the highest concentration of leaf magnesium was observed to non-grafted Daphnis plants, which was significantly different from other grafting combinations compounds except Daphnis self-grafted plants.
 
Conclusion
The results of the present study showed that drought stress had the greatest effect on dry matter, and the amount of photosynthetic indices and pigments in tomato plants. Based on the results of the present study, it was found that the most of the reduce vegetative and physiological parameters was observed in Daphnis cultivar grafted on the thorum rootstock, were significantly reduced compared to self-grafted or non-grafted plants, which it was due to the dwarfing effects of this rootstock or grafting incompatibility. According to the results of the present study, it can be postulated that in drought stress Isabella cultivars grafted on the wild eggplant rootstock had more growh than other combination grafting. Hence it proposed more studies in this case. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Ainigar Sadafi, H., Zahedi, B., Mousavi Fard, P., & Moradipour, F. (2015). The effect of bases on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of two commercial tomato cultivars. Master Thesis of Lorestan University.
  2. Alc-ázar, R., Altabella, T., Marco, F., Bortolotti, C., Reymond, M., Koncz, C., & Tiburcio, A.F. (2010). Polyamines: molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Planta, 231(6), 1237-1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1130-0
  3. Arnon, D.I(1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Journal of Plant Physiology, 24, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  4. Asseng, S., & van Herwaarden, A.F. (2003). Analysis of the benefits to wheat yield from assimilates stored prior to grain filling in a range of environments. Plant Soil, 256, 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026231904221
  5. Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Leonardi, & Bie, Z. ( 2010). Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 127(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2010.08.004
  6. Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., Salerno, A., & Rea, E. (2010). The effectiveness of grafting to improve alkalinity tolerance in watermelon. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 68(3), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.12.005
  7. Delauney, A.J., & Verma, D.P.S. (2002). Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation Plants. The Plant Journal, 2, 122-112. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x
  8. Estefan, G., Sommr, R., & Ryan, J. (2013). Method of soil, plant and water analysis. Third Edition. Beirut, Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. 250 p.
  9. Farooq, M., Vahid, A., Lee, D.J., Ito, O. & Siddique, K.H. (2009). Advances in drought resistance of rice. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28(4), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902952173
  10. Germana, C. (1997). Experiences on the response of almond plants (A. communis ) to water stress. Acta Horticulturae, 449, 497-503. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.449.69
  11. Ghazanshahi, J(2006). Soil and plant analysis. Aeizh Publications, 274p. (In Persian)
  12. Gisbert-Mullor, R., Pascual-Seva, , Martinez-Gimeno, M., Lopez-Serrano, L., Badal Marin, E., Perez-Perez, J., Bonet, L., Padilla, Y.G., Calatayud, A., Pascual, B., & Lopez-Galarza, S. (2020). Grafting onto an appropriate rootstock reduces the impact on yield and quality of controlled deficit irrigated pepper crops. Agronomy, 10,15-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101529
  13. Goto, R., de Miguel, A., Ignacio Marsal, J., Gorbe, E., & Calatayud, A. (2013). Effect of different rootstocks on growth, chlorophyll a fluorescence and mineral composition of two grafted scions of tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 36, 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.757321
  14. Gregorian, V. ( 2002). Physiology and methods of grafting. Amidi Publications, 351 pages.
  15. Gupta, A.P., Neue, H.U., & Singh, V.P. (1993). Phosphorus determination in rice plants containing variable manganese contant by the phosphor molybdo vanadate (yellow) and phosphomolybdate (blue) colorometric methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 24, 1309-1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629309368878
  16. Hassani, B., & Seidi, M. (2013). The effect of drought tolerant rootstocks and different irrigation regimes on the quality and yield of Early Orbata tomatoes. Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University.
  17. Huang, Y., Hua, L., Liu, B., Fan, Z., & Bie, Z. (2013). Grafting onto different rootstocks as a means to improve watermelon tolerance to low potassium stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 149(14), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.009
  18. Isfendiyaroglu, M., & Zeker, E. (2002). The relation between phenolic compound and seed dormancy in Pistacia In AKB. E. (ed.). 11 Grema Serr Pistachios and Almond. Chieres optins Mediterraneenes, 56, 232-277.
  19. Kashi, A., Salehi, R., & Javanpour Heravi, R. (2008). Grafting technology in growing and producing vegetables. Agricultural Education Publications, first edition, 212 p.
  20. Keshavarznia, R., Shahbazi, M., Mohamadi, V., Hosseini Salekdeh, G., Ahmadi, E., & Mohseni Fard, A. (2014). The role of root structure and physiological traits of barley in response to drought stress. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 45(4), 553-563. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2017.202541.654065
  21. Kirnak, H., Kaya, C., Tas, E., & Higgs, D. (2001). The Influence of water deficition on vegetative growth, physiology, fruit yield and quality in eggplants. Bulgarian Journal Plant Physiology, 27(3–4), 34–46.
  22. Latifah, V., Widaryanto, E., Maghfoer, M.D., & (2021). Economic analysis, growth and yield of grafting tomato varieties for Solanum torvum as a rootstock. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(5), 733-742.
  23. Lutts, S., Kinet, J.M., & Bouharmont, J. (1996). NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Journal Annals of Botany, 78, 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0134
  24. Mahmoudnia Meymand, M., Farsi, M., Marashi, S.H., & Ebadi, P. (2012). Investigation of physiological responses of four tomato species to drought stress. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 26(4), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.18252
  25. Miguel, A., Maroto, J.V., San Bautista, A., Baixauli, C., Cebolla, V., Pascual, B., & Guardiola, J.L. (2004). The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of Fusarium wilt. Scientia Horticulturae, 103(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.007
  26. Molavi, H., Liaqat, V., & Mohammadi, M. (2012). Optimizing water consumption and determining the sensitivity coefficients of tomatoes under both conditions salinity and drought stress in Karaj region. Journal of Water and Soil, 3(24), 592-583.
  27. Patakas, A., Nikolaou, N., Zioziou, E., Radoglou, K., & Noitsakis, B. (2002). The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Science, 163(2), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00140-1
  28. Paquin, R., & Lechasseur, P. (1979). Observations sur une méthode de do-sage de la proline libre dans les extraits de plantes. Candian Journal of Botany, 57, 1851–1854. https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-233
  29. Petran, A., & Hoover, E. (2014). Solanum torvum as a compatible rootstock in interspecific tomato grafting. Jornal of Horticulture, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0354.1000103
  30. Rezai, Z. (2016). The effect of different super absorbent polymer and animal manure ratios on quantitative and qualitative characteristic of fennel under drought stress conditions. M.Sc. Thesis in Agronomy, Shahrekord, Iran.
  31. Rodrigues, J.G., Edvardo, P.M.J., Forner, B., & Angeles, F. (2010). Citrus rootstocks response to water stress. Sciatica Horticulturae, 126, 95-102.
  32. Ruiz, J.M., Belakbir, A., López-Cantarero, I., & Romero, L. (1997). Leaf-macronutrient content and yield in grafted melon plants. A model to evaluate the influence of rootstock genotype. Scientia Horticulturae, 71(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00106-4
  33. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D., Hass, M.R., Kashi, A.K., Amiri, A., & Alizadeh, A. (2010). Genetic variability of some agronomic traits in the Iranian Fenugreek landraces under drought stress and non-stress conditions. African Journal of Plant Science, 4(2), 12-20.
  34. Salisbury, F.B., & Ross, C.B. (1991). Plant physiology. Wadasworth publishing ompany, 316-321.
  35. Shahabi, M.R., Zakeri, A., & Shirzadi, H. (2013). The effect of different grafting methods on the growth and yield of RedTop grafted tomatoes, the first national electronic conference "New Topics in Horticulture", Jahrom University, 455-459.
  36. Shahbazi, P., Karimi, N., & Ghasempour, H.R. (2014). Investigation of the effect of drought stress on biochemical and physiological processes of two varieties of Lycopersicun esculentum, Kali and Early Orabana. Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University.
  37. Shokrani, F., & Pirzad, A. (2012). Evaluation of biological nitrogen influence on oil variations and nutrient content of Calendula officinalis under drought stress conditions. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 11(11), 1550-1555. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.11.11.1632
  38. Smolinski, A.T., & Pestka, J.J. (2003). Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory cytokine production in vitro and in vivo by the herbal constituents apigenin (chamomile), ginsenoside Rb1 (ginseng) and parthenolide (feverfew), Food Chemical Toxicology, 411381-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(03)00146-7
  39. Suchoff, D.H., Gunter, C.C., & Schultheis, R.J. (2018). Rootstock effect on grafted tomato transplant shoots and root responses to drying soils. Horticulture Science, 53(11), 1586-1592. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13215-18
  40. Urlic, B., Runjic, M., Zanic, K., Mandusic, M., Vuletin Selak, G., Paskovic, I., & Dumicic, G. (2020). Effect of partial root-zone drying on grafted tomatoin commercial greenhouse. Horticultural Science, 47(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.17221/130/2018-HORTSCI
  41. Wang, Y.Q. (2011). Plant grafting and its application in biological research. Chinese Science Bulltein, 56, 3511–3517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4816-1
  42. Waraich, E.A., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M., Saifullah, Y., & Ahmad, M. (2011). Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agriculture. Scand, Section B Plant Soil Science, 61, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2010.491954
  43. Yetisir, H., Ozdemir, A.E., Aras, V., Candir, E., & Aslan, O. (2013). Rootstocks effect on plant nutrition concentration in different organ of grafted watermelon. Agricultural Sciences, 4(5), 230-237.
CAPTCHA Image