The Effect of Foliar Spray of Brassinosteroid on Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Seedling under Drought Stress

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Saeid Khosravi ¹
• Maryam Haghighi ²

¹ Former M.Sc. Student Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology

² Associate Professor Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2021.61838.0

Abstract

Introduction: Brassinosteroids promote plant growth by enhancing some metabolic activities such as photosynthesis, nucleic acid biosynthesis, proteins and carbohydrates. Mechanisms of resistance and tolerance in plants have been developed to tolerate water deficit stress. One way to deal with drought is to use plant growth regulators. Brassinosteroids were first extracted from the pollen of turnip (Brassica napus) and were considered as the sixth group of plant growth regulators. These compounds stimulate growth and cell division and affect electrical properties, membrane permeability, stability and activity of membrane enzymes. Nowadays, brassinosteroids have been extracted from various plants and their structure and function have been identified.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted in a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design on Capsicum annuum L. Castello cultivar under the average daily temperature of 25 °C and 18 °C at 75% relative humidity in greenhouses. Research conducted by the College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, with four drought treatments using polyethylene glycol 6000 solutions at four levels of 0, -6, -7, and -8 bar. Brassinosteroids were sprayed in two 1 μM control levels. Pepper seeds planted in transplanting trays containing 1 to 2 volumes perlite and vermiculite substrate. When the actual leaf of seedlings appeared, the root thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and then were transferred to black plastic containers with a diameter of 16 and height 13cm and 1L volume containing Johnson's nutrient solution including four dry treatments using 6000 polyethylene glycol solution and aerated in control for 15 minutes every 5 minutes. At the end of the experiment, vegetative factors such as fresh and dry weight of different parts of the plant, plant length, and volume, and physiological factors such as proline and abscisic acid content and chlorophyll fluorescence changes were measured.
Results: The results of the analysis of variance table showed that brassinosteroid had no significant effect on most vegetative traits except root volume and weight and all physiological traits except chlorophyll fluorescence and the mentioned traits increased with the application of 1 mM brassinosteroid. However, the main effects of drought except for amino acid and the interaction of drought and brassinosteroids were significant on all traits. The results of the main drought effects showed that the root fresh weight at -8 bar and dry weight at -7 bar significantly decreased, whereas fresh and dry weight of the shoots at lower than -6 bar. The onset of decline showed that the root length and volume appeared to decrease with the onset of stress by -6 bar and the plant length also reduced with the first stress level. Drought stress at -6 bar level decreased chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll index and Abscisic acid while at -7 bar decreased protein and increased proline. The results also showed that the amount of sulfuric, essential and unnecessary amino acids were significantly reduced by drought stress and brassinosteroid had no effect. Total amino acid content decreased with drought stress but there was no significant difference with control. With increasing drought stress, the fresh and dry weights of shoots decreased and the intensity of shoots decreased. The intensity of shoot growth decreased with the use of brassinosteroids at moderate stress but the mentioned trait showed the same adverse effects at all levels of stress. Brasinosteroid application decreased stress indices such as proline (7%) and abscisic acid (50%) and this decrease was more pronounced in proline, especially in more severe treatments. Amino acid and protein levels decreased with drought stress, and the use of brassinosteroids could not be effectively affected by this reduction, especially for the compounds and the amount of amino acids.
The results of biplot analysis showed that the vegetative and protein traits had better mean in stress condition in the presence and absence of stress and in higher stress severity and application of brassinosteroid affected root fresh weight and abscisic acid content more than the other traits. While in mild stress it seemed to be more effectively on the steroid and most of the vegetative and physiological traits than the control.
Conclusion: It seems that the application of brassinosteroids on pepper seedling in drought stress at a concentration of 1 μM is effective in maintaining vegetative properties and reducing negative effects of stress and reducing stress indices.

Keywords

• Abscisic acid
• Amino acid
• Chlorophyll fluorescence
• Growth regulators

20.1001.1.20084730.1400.35.3.5.9

Main Subjects

• Growing vegetables

References

• Ahmadi Mousavi E., Kalanti KH., and Torkzadeh M. 2005. Effects of epibrassinolide on lipid peroxidation, prolin, sugar and photosynthesis pigments content of canola (Brassica napus) under water stress. Iranian Journal of Biology 18(4): 295-306. (In Persian with English abstract)
• Ahmadi Mousavi E., Manoukhehri Kalantari KH., and Torkzadeh M. 2005. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide on lipid peroxidation, prolin, sugar and photosynthesis pigments content of colza (Brassica napus) under water stress. Iranian Journal of Botany 18(4):295-306. (In Persian with English abstract)
• Ananthi M., Sasthri G., and Srimathi P. 2013. Integrated seed and crop management techniques for increasing productivity of greengram cv. CO₆. International Journal of Scientific Research 2(11): 37-38.
• Bajgaz A., and Hayat S.H. 2009. Effect of brassinosteroids on the plant responses to environmental stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47: 1-8.
• Basu P., Ashoo S., and Sukumaran N. 1998. Changes in net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in potato leaves induced by water stress. Photosynthetic 19: 13-35.
• Bates L.S., Waldarn R.P., and Teare I.P. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant Soil 39:205-208.
• Behnamnia M., Kalantari K.M., and Rezanejad F. 2009. Exogenous application of brassinosteroid alleviates drought-induced oxidativestress in Lycopersicon esculentum General and Applied Plant Physiology 35(1–2): 22–34.
• Bradford M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistr 72: 248-254.
• Chogan R. 2004. Modified corn for tolerance of drought and nitrogen stresses. Agriculture department publication p. 95. (In Persian with English abstract)
• Clous Steven D. and Sasse M. 1998. Brassinosteroids: essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annual Reviews 49: 427-451.
• Flexas J., Ribas-Carbo M., Hanson D.T., Bota J., Otto B., Cifre J., McDowell N., Medrano H., and Kaldenhoff R. 2006. Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO₂ in vivo. Plant Journal 48: 427-439.
• Ghanbari A.A., Shakiba M.R., Toorchi M., and Choukan R. 2013. Morpho-physiological responses of common bean leaf to water deficit stress. European journal of experimental biology 3(1): 487-492.
• Haubrick L.L., Torsethaugen G., and Assmann S.M. 2006. Effect of brassinolide, alone and in concert with abscisic acid, on control of stomatal aperture and potassium currents of Vicia faba guard cell protoplasts. Plant Physiology 128: 134–143.
• Hayat S., Hasan S.A., Yusuf M., Hayat Q., and Ahmad A. 2010. Effect of homobrassinolide on photosynthesis, fluorescence and antioxidant system in the presence or absence of salinity and temperature in Vignaradiata. Environmental and Experimental Botany 69: 105–112.
• Hayat S.H., and Aqil A. 2011. Brassinosteroids: a class of plant hormone. In: P. Krishna, editor, UK Divi.
• Hemmati , Ebadi A., Khamari S., and Sedghi M. 2018. Response of evergreen plant (Calendula officinalis L.) to ascorbic acid and brassinosteroids under drought stress. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 12(2): 191-210. (In Persian with English abstract)
• Hmida-Sayari A., Gargouri-Bouzid R., Bidani A., Jaoua L., Savoure A., and Jaoua S. 2005. Overexpression of D1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers salt tolerance in transgenic potato plants. Plant Science 169:746-752.
• Kafi M. 2000. Mechanisms of resistance to environmental stresses in plants. Publishers of Mashhad Ferdowsi University, p. 309. (Translated in Persian)
• Kaya C., Higgs D., and Kernak H. 2001. The effects of high salinity (NACL) and supplementary phosphorus and potassium on physiology and nutrition development of Spanish. Plant Physiology Journal 27: 47-59.
• Li K., and Feng C.H. 2011. Effects of brassinolide on drought resistance of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings under water stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33(4): 1293-1300.
• Manivannan P., Jaleel C.A., Somasundaram R., and Panneerselvam R. 2008. Osmoregu-lation and antioxidant metabolism in drought-stressed Helianthus annuus undertriadimefon drenching. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331: 418-425.
• Matthews M.A., and Anderson M.M. 1988. Fruit ripening in Vitisvinifera: Responses to seasonal water dificits. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 39(4): 313-320.
• Meudt W.J., Thompson M.J., and Bennett H.W. 1983. Investigations on the mechanism of brassinosteroides response. Plant Growth Regulators Society of American 10: 312-318.
• Meudt W.J., Thompson M.J., Mandava, N.B., and Worley, J.F. 1984. Method for promoting plant growth. USA: Can Patent Press.
• Mohammadian R., Rahimian H., Moghaddam M., and Sadeghian S.Y. 2003. Effect of early drought stress on sugar beets chlorophyll fluorescence. Pakistan Journal ofBiological Sciences 6(20): 1763-1769.
• Nahar Sh., Sahoo L., and Tanti B. 2018. Screening of drought tolerant rice through morphophysiological and biochemical approaches. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 15: 150-159.
• Ozdamir F., Bor M., Demiral T., and Turkan I. 2004. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide on seed germination, seedling growth, lipid peroxidation, proline content and antioxidative system of rice (Oriza sativa) under salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation 42: 203-211.
• Pandey R., and Agarwal R.M. 1998. Water stress-induced change in proline contents and nitrat reductase activity in rise light and dark condition. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 4: 53-57.
• Prins C.S., Vieira I.J.C., and Freitas S.P. 2010. Growth regulators and essential oil Production. Brazilian Socity of Plant Physiology 22(2): 91-102.
• Rahnama H., Vakilian H., Fahimi H., and Ghareyazie B. 2011. Enhanced salt stress tolerance in transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum) expressing a bacterial mtlD gene. Acta Physiology Plant 33: 1521–1532.
• Sairam R.K. 1994. Effects of homobrassinolide application on plant metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisture-stress conditions of two wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regulation 14: 173-181.
• Schilling G., Schiller C., and Otto S. 1991. Influence of brassinosteroids on organ relations and enzyme activities of sugar-beet plants Brassinosteroids. Chemistry, Bioactivity and Applications 474: 208-219.
• Sengupta K., Banik N.C., Bhui S., and Mitra S. 2011. Effect of brassinolide on growth and yield of summer green gram crop. Journal of Crop and Weed 7(2): 152-154.
• Shahid M.A., Pervaz M.A., Balal R.M., Mattson N.S., Rashid A., Ahmad R., Ayyub C.M., and Abbas T. 2011. Brassinosteroid (24-epibrassinolide) enhances growth and alleviates the deleterious effects induced by salt stress in pea (Pisum sativum). AJCS 5(5): 500-510.
• Tang L., Kim M.D., Yang K.S., Kwon S.Y., Kim SH., Kim J.S., Yun D.J., Kwak S.S., and Lee H.S. 2008. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants overexpressing nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2 against multiple environmental stresses. Transgenic Research 17: 705–715.
• Vazan S., Ranji Z., Tehrani M., Ghalavand A., and Saaneyi M. 2002. Drought stress effects of on ABA accumulation and stomatal conductivity of sugar beet, Journal of Agriculture 3: 176-180. (In Persian with English abstract)
• Zullo M., and Adam A.T. 2002. Brassino-steroid phytohormones, structure, bioactivity and applications. Journal of Plant Physiology 14: 83-121.
• Zafari M., Ebadi A., and Jahanbakhsh S. 2012. Effect of mycorrhiza on water deficit resistance in alfalfa. Master thesis. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili 99 p. (In Persian with English abstract)