The Efficiency of Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth Characteristics and some Nutrients Uptake of Plane tree Seedling (Platanus orientalis L.)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Hamed Alipour ¹
• Ali Nikbakht ¹
• Nematollah Etemadi ¹
• Farshid Nourbakhsh ¹
• Farhad Rejali ²

¹ Isfahan University of Technology

² Soil and Water Research Center, Karaj

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v29i4.25940

Abstract

Introduction: Drought stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses which significantly reduce yield and growth of most of plants. Plane tree is one of the important trees planted in the urban landscapes of Iran. One of the major limiting factors of landscapes development is providing water for plants. Deficit irrigation is a desirable method for saving water use in water deficit conditions and ultimately reducing necessary cost of water securement to landscape plants. Moreover, inoculation of plant root with mycorrhizal fungi can be considered as a method to reduce water demand of plants. In addition, mycorrhiza can increase plant resistance against environmental stress, such as salinity, temperature stress, drought stress and etc. Mycorrhiza can improve drought stress through enhancing water uptake as result of extra radical hyphae and stomatal regulation or transpiration. Increasing P concentration by mycorrhiza inoculation can be another mechansim for drought resistance in plants. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate two Glomus species in combination together on plane tree under water deficit for growth characteristics and nutrients uptake such as P, Fe and Zn concentration.
Materials and Methods: This outdoor experiment was conducted at - Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, with average temperature 14.2 ºC and 27.9 ºC night/day, respectively and relative humidity 35-70% between Mar and Aug 2012 and repeated under the same condition in 2013. This experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of inoculation with mycorrhizal fungus on plane saplings response to different applicable water levels (50 and 100% of water needs) based on a completely randomized design with 3 replications. The treatments were control (without fertilizer), Germans peat + fertilizer, Germans peat + fertilizer + mycorrhiza in 50% of field capacity and Germans peat + fertilizer + mycorrhizain 100% of field capacity. The Mycorrhiza fungi (mycorrhizal root, soil containing spore and extra radical mycelium) were obtained from Institute of Soil and Water Research (Tehran, Iran). There were inoculums treatments: two AM fungus inoculums (G. intraradices and G. mosseae) with combination of both. The inoculated dosage was approximately 80 spores g-1 for G. intraradices and 80 spores g-1 for G. mosseae, calculated by microscope before the experiment. Plants were irrigated daily base of 100% FC after the confidence of establishing plants about 2 months and then differential irrigations were applied. The amount of 100 and 50% ET was applied for full irrigation, moderate and serve deficit irrigation, respectively. To monitor the soil water content, tensiometry probe tubes were inserted into the soil in control pot around the root. Irrigation was performed whenever 40% of the available water was consumed. In order to calculate the amount of water necessary to bring each soil to FC, soil samples were collected and the water content determined by drying. Photosynthesis rate was measured with a LCI portable photosynthesis system. Soluble sugars measured according to Phenol–Sulfuric Acid method. Extraction of the Leaf chlorophyll pigments using with 100% acetone. The extraction of P, K, Fe, and Zn from the plant tissue material was performed by using dry ashing method. The mean data of two years were analyzed with SAS 9.1 software, the means were compared for significance by the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05.
Results and Discussion: Mycorrhiza inoculation significantly increased fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, total sugar, leaf area, photosynthesis rate and P and K concentration as compared to control. As compared to the 100 and 50% FC, total chlorophyll, fresh and dry weight and P concentration significantly was increased in 100% FC (Table 4 & 5). The results showed that inoculation of plants with mycorrhizal fungus significantly increased most growth parameters including leaf area, chlorophyll content and leaf fresh and dry weight of plane saplings. Phosphorus content significantly increased in inoculated plants as compared to non-inoculated plants. It is recommended that in dry regions and water shortage conditions, the deficit irrigation method accompanied with mycorrhizal fungus inoculation to save water.
Conclusion: Our data showed that mycorrhiza inoculations increased most growth parameters including leaf area, chlorophyll content and leaf fresh and dry weight of plane saplings. In conclusion, mycorrhiza inoculations can increase plant tolerance against drought stress by increasing phosphorus concentration, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesis rate. Generally, results of this study revealed that inoculation of plane tress with mycorrhizal fungi, improved plant growth under stress conditions through its positive influence on nutrients uptake, chlorophyll content and other growth parameters.

Keywords

• Irrigation level
• landscape
• Symbiosis
• tree

20.1001.1.20084730.1394.29.4.5.9

References

Allen M. F. 1982. Influence of vesicular- arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag ex Steud. New Phytologist., 91: 191-196.

2- Allen M. F., Edith B., Jennifer L., Lansing A., Kurt S., Pregitzer B., Ron L., Hendrick C., Roger W., Ruess D., and Collins S.L. 2010. Responses to chronic N fertilization of ectomycorrhizal pinon but not arbuscularmycorrhizal juniper in a pinon-juniper woodland. Journal of Arid Environments, 74:1170-1176.

3- Asrar A. A., Abdel-Fattah G. M., and Elhindi K.M. 2012. Improving growth, flower yield, and water relations of snapdragon (Antirhinum majusL.) plants grown under well-watered andwater-stress conditions using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Photosynthetica, 50(2): 305-316.

4- Asrar A. A., and Elhindi K. M. 2011. Alleviation of drought stress of marigold (Tagetes erecta) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 18:93–98.

5- Auge R. M., Stodola A., Brown M. S., and Bethlenfalvay G. L. 1992. Stomatal response of mycorrhizal cowpea and soybean to short-term osmotic stress. New Phytologist. 120: 117-125.

6- Auge R. M., Moore J. L., Sylvia D. M., and Cho, K. 2004a. Mycorrhiza promotion of host stomatal conductance in relation to irradiance and temperature. Mycorrhiza. 14: 85-92.

7- Auge R. M., Schekel K. A., and Wample R. L. 1986. Osmotic adjustmentin leaves of VA mycorrhizal rose plants in response to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 82: 765-770.

8- Borkowska B. 2002. Growth and photosynthetic activity of micropropagated strawberry plants inoculated with endomycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and growing under drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 4: 365-370.

9- Caravaca F., Alguacil M. M., Hernandez J. A., and Rodan A. 2005. Involvment of antioxidant enzyme and nitrate reductase activities during water stress and recovery of mycorrhizal Myrtus communi and Phillyrea angustifolia plants. Plant Science, 169: 191- 197.

10- Chaves M. M., Maroco J. P., and Pereira J.S. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drowght from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30: 239-264.

11- Dodd J. 2000. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agro-natural ecosystem. Outlook on Agriculture, 29:63-70.

12- Dubios M., Gilles K. A., Hamilton J. K., Rebers P. A., and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28: 350-356.

13- Estarda L. A., and Davies A. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence water relation, gas exchange, absicic acid and growth of micropropagated chile ancho pepper (Capsicum annum) plantlets during acclimatization and post- acclimatization. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160:1073-1083.

14- Fini A., Frangi P., Amoroso G., Piatti R., Faoro M., Bellasio C., and Ferrini F. 2011. Effect of controlled inoculation with specific mycorrhizal fungi from the urban environment on growth and physiology of containerized shade tree species growing under different water regimes. Mycorrhiza, 21: 703–719.

15- Hardie k. 1985. The effect of removal of extraradical hyphae on water uptake by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. New Phytologist, 101: 677-684.

16- Hooker J. E., Munro M., and Atkinson D. 1992. Vesicular-arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi induced alteration in poplar root system morphology. Plant and Soil, 145:207-214.

17- Ibrahim H. A., Abdel-Fattah G. M., Eman F. M., Abdel-Aziz M. H., and Shohr A.E. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and spermine alleviate the adverse effects of salinity stress on electrolyte leakage and productivity of wheat plants. Phyton-Annales Rei Botanicae, 51: 261-276.

18. Kafi, M., and Nikbakht, A. 2006. Investigation of different nutrition methods via trunk injection and placement in holes in order to control the Platanus orientalis L. chlorosis. The final report of a joint project with the city of Karaj, Tehran University, Iran (in Farsi).

19- Kafkas S., and Ortas I. 2009. Various Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Dry Weights, P and Zn Uptake of Four Pistacia Species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32:146–159.

20- Kapoor R., Giri B., and Mukerji K.G. 2004. Improved growth and essential oil yield and quality in Foeniculum vulgare mill on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with p-fertilizer. Bioresource Technology, 93:307-311.

21- Karagianidis N., Bletsos F., and Stavropoulos N. 2002. Effect of verticillium wilt and mycorrhiza on root colonization, growth and nutrient uptake in tomato and eggplant seedling. Scientia Horticulturae, 94: 145-156.

22. Khorsandi, S. 2011. Reviews presence linkages endophytic fungi with longevity and morphologic properties plane trees. M.S. thesis. College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran (in Farsi).

23- Lee B. R., Muneer S., Avice J. C., Jung W. J., and Kim T. H. 2012. Mycorrhizal colonisation and P-supplement effects on N uptake and N assimilation in perennial ryegrass under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. Mycorrhiza, 22(7):525-534.

24-Levitt J. 1990. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Academic press, New York, 698 pp.

25- Lichtenhaler H. K.1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids, the pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. p. 350-382. In: R. Douce and L. Packer (Eds.). Methods Enzymol. Academic Press Inc, New York.

26- Loucher T. D., Samson G., Hernandez C., Chagavardieff P., and Desjardin Y. 1999. Importance of light and CO2 on the effects of endomycorrhizal colonization on growth and photosynthesis of potato plantlets (Solanum tuberosum) in an invitro tripartite system. New Phytologist, 142:539-550.

27- Mathur N., and Vyas A. 1995. Influence of VA mycorrhiza on net photosynthesis and transpiration of Ziziphus mauritiana. Journal of Plant Physiology, 147:328–330.

28- Miransari M., Bahrami H. A., Rejali F., Malakouti M. J., and Torabi H. 2007. Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on corn (Zea Mays L.) growth. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39: 2014-2026.

29- Olsen S. R., and Sommers L. E. 1982. Phosphorus. p. 403-431. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.). Method of soil analysis. Par 2. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

30- Ozgonen H., and Erkilic A. 2007. Growth enhancement and phytophthora blight (Phytophtora capsici Leonian) control by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation in pepper. Crop Protection, 26: 1682-1688.

31- Page A.L., Miller R. H., and Keeney D. R. 1982. Methods of soil analysis.p. 1159 In Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed., ASA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

32- Peterson R. L., Massicotte H. B., and MelvilleL. 2004. Mycorrhizas:Anatomy and Cell Biology, Inc., National Research Council of Canada, 176pp.

33- Porcel R., and Ruiz-Lozano J. M. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhizalinfluence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 1743-1750.

34- Rajan S. K., Reddy B. J. D., and Bagyaraj D. J. 2000. Screening of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for their symbiotic efficiency with Tectona grandis. Forest Ecology and Management, 126: 91-95.

35- Rooney D. C., Prosser J. I., Bending G. D., Baggs E. M., Killham K., and Hodge A. 2011. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation on the growth and phosphorus nutrition of Populus euramericana c.v. Ghoy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35:4605-4612.

36- Ruiz-Lozano J. M. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress: New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza, 13: 309-317.

37- Schellenbaum L., Sprenger N., Schuepp H., Wiemken A., and Boller T. 1999. Effects of drought, transgenic expression of fructan synthesizing evzyme and of mycorrhizal symbiosis on growth and soluble carbohydrate pools tobacco plants. New Phytologist, 142: 67-77.

38- Shao H. B., Chu Y., Wu G., Zhang J. H., Lu Z. H., and Hu Y. C. 2007. Changes of some antioxidative physiological indices under soil water deficits among 10 wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes at tillering stage. Colloids and Surfaces, 54: 143–149.

39- Subramanian K. S., and Charest C. 1995. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the metabolism of maize under drought stress. Mycorrhiza, 5: 273-278.

40- Subramanian K. S and Charest C. 1999. Acquisiion of N by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its impact on physiological responses in maize under drought-stressed and well-watered conditions. Mycorrhiza. 9: 69-75.

41- Thakur A. K., and Panwar J. D. S. 1997. Response of rhizobium-vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal symbionts on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and sucrose translocation in greengram (Phaseolus radiates). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 67(6):245-248.

42- Tisserant B., Gianinazzi S., and Pearson V.G. 1996. Relationships between lateral root order, arbuscular mycorrhiza development, and the physiological state of the symbiotic fungus in Platanus acerifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany, 74:1947-1955.

43- University of California Cooperative Extension. 2000. A guide toestimating irrigation water needs of landscape plantings in California. California Department of Water Resources, 160pp.

44- Veresoglou S. D., Menexes G., and Rillig M. C. 2012. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the allometricpartition of host plant biomass to shoots and roots?A meta-analysis of studies from 1990 to 2010. Mycorrhiza, 22:227–235.

45- Wu, Q. S., and Xia R. X. 2004. The relation between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and water metabolism in plants. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 20(1): 188–192.

46- Wu, Q.s., ZouY.n., Xia R.X., and Wang M.Y. 2007. Five Glomus species affect water relation of Citrus tangerine during drought stress. Botan. Stu., 48: 147-158.

47- xiloyannis, C., B. Dichio., V. Nuzzo., and G. Celano, 1999. Defense strategies of Olive against water stress. Acta Horticulturae, 47: 423-426.