ارزیابی ترکیبات فیتوشیمیایی میوه برخی از ارقام و ژنوتیپ های آلو و گوجه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• زهرا فلاتی ¹
• محمدرضا فتاحی مقدم نوقابی ²
• علی عبادی ³

¹ دانشگاه تهران

² کرج

³ تهران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v31i4.61581

چکیده

آلوها (Prunus spp.) به عنوان یکی از رایج‌ترین میوه‌های هسته‌دار، دارای کالری پایین و ارزش غذایی نسبتاً بالایی هستند. تنوع زیاد در آلوها سبب ایجاد تفاوت در ترکیبات شیمیایی میوه نیز شده است. این آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی گروه مهندسی علوم باغبانی و فضای سبز پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران در فاصله زمانی 1392-1394 اجرا شده است. خصوصیات کیفی میوه نظیر محتوای ویتامین ث، صفات مربوط به رنگ پوست و گوشت میوه، محتوای کارتنوئید، آنتوسیانین، فنل کل و ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی 16 رقم و ژنوتیپ آلو مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج تجزیه واریانس تفاوت معنی‌دار ارقام بررسی شده را از لحاظ تمام شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری شده نشان داد. ارقام ʼگوجه قرمزʽ و ʼژاپنیʽ بالاترین میزان ویتامین ث را با 5/18 میلی‌گرم ویتامین ث در 100 گرم وزن تازه ، رقم ʼقطره طلاʽ با 97/53 میلی‌گرم در 100 گرم وزن تازه بالاترین میزان کارتنوئید کل را داشتند. رقمʼگوجه قرمزʽ بالاترین میزان شاخص آنتوسیانین را با 521/0 جذب در طول موج 530 نانومتر دارا بود و رقم ʼازارکʽ بالاترین میزان فنل کل و فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی را به ترتیب با 6/372 میلی‌گرم اسید گلیک در 100 گرم وزن میوه برای فنل کل و 34/96 درصد برای درصد فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی در بین ارقام بررسی شده داشتند. ضرایب همبستگی بین صفات نشان داد که عمده ترکیبات فنلی میوه‌های آلو در پوست میوه تجمع دارند و همبستگی بالایی بین شدت رنگ پوست میوه و محتوای فنل کل در آلوها وجود دارد. از این‌رو رقم ʼازارکʽ با دارا بودن بالاترین میزان شاخص رنگ a* پوست میوه، بیشترین میزان فنل کل و ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی را در بین ارقام بررسی شده دارا بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• آنتوسیانین
• ظرفیت آنتی اکسیدانی
• کارتنوئید
• فنل کل
• ویتامین ث

20.1001.1.20084730.1396.31.4.4.2

عنوان مقاله [English]

Thehe Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds of Fruits in some Plum and Prune Cultivars and Genotypes

نویسندگان [English]

• Zahra Falati ¹
• Mohammadreza Fattahi ²
• Ali Ebady ³

¹ University of Tehran

²

³

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Plums (Prunus spp.) as one of the most popular stone fruits, have low calories and high nutritional value. Over the past decades global production of European and Japanese plums reached from 6,110,870 tons in 1990 to 11,528,337 tons in 2013. In the same period plum production in Iran reached from 118,936 tons to 305,262 tons. Great variety of plum fruits caused differences in chemical composition as well. Plum fruits are rich in bioactive compounds or biochemicals such as vitamins (A, C and E), anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds which have high antioxidant activity.
Materials and Methods: This research was done in a randomized complete block design with three replications in Horticultural Research Station at College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Tehran University in 2013-2015. Fruit quality characteristics such as vitamin C content, color traits of the fruit skin and flesh, the content of carotenoids, anthocyanins, total phenolics and antioxidant capacity of 16 plum and prune cultivars and genotypes were evaluated.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance showed significant differences in terms of all measured factors. The highest L* index (brightness) of fruit skin was observed in 'Tanasgol" and "Compooti" and then in "Golden Drop" and "Shams" cultivars and the lowest level of that was measured in "Sugar" and "Gogeh Sabz" cultivars. "Black Star" and "Gogeh Germez" Showed the highest brightness of fruit flesh among examined cultivars and the lowest brightness of fruit flesh was investigated in "Sugar". A* color index of skin and flesh of fruit also showed significant differences among investigated cultivars and the highest level of that in "Ozarak" cultivar was observed. "Gogeh Sabz" and "Golden Drop" also had the lowest level of this index. "Gogeh Germez" had the highest of a*color index of fruit flesh and "Japanese" cultivar was in second place. The lowest level of this index was measured in "Ozarak" and "Shams" cultivars. "Tanasgol" and "Compooti" had the highest fruit skin b*color index among cultivars and "Santarsa", "Sugar," "Stanley" and "Bukhara" showed the lowest of that. "Black Star" and after that "Tanasgol" and "Dargazi" had the highest b*color index of fruit flesh. "Japanese" had also the lowest b* color index of fruit flesh. The intensity or color purity varied among cultivars and the highest of that was observed in "Tanasgol" and "Compooti" and then in "Ozarak". "Black Star" had the highest chroma of fruit skin and the highest fruit flesh color intensity. The lowest of this index in the fruit flesh was observed in "Santarosa", "Sugar" and "Japanese" cultivars. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) content varied in investigate cultivars. "Gogeh Germez" and "Japanese" had the highest vitamin C content and "Stanley" was showed the lowest amount of vitamin C. "Golden Drop ","Santarosa" and "Compooti" showed the highest total carotenoid among examined cultivars and "Gogeh Germez" had the lowest total carotenoid. "Gogeh Germez" and "Compooti" had the highest and lowest amount of anthocyanin index respectively. The highest total phenol and antioxidant activity was measured in "Ozarak". The lowest total antioxidant capacity was in"Gogeh Sabz". The results showed that There was high correlation (r= 0.93) between antioxidant capacity and a* fruit skin color index. High correlation (r= 0.83) between phenol content and antioxidant capacity of fruits was also observed. Between a* color index of fruit skin and phenolic content was observed high correlation (r= 0.89). As well as between anthocyanin and phenolic content and between anthocyanin and a* fruit skin color index, respectively (r= 0.86) and (r= 0.59) high correlation was detected.
Conclusions: "Ozarak" in terms of antioxidant activity and total phenol component was superior. The highest amount of anthocyanin related to the "Gogeh Germez". "Golden Drop"," Santarosa" and "Compooti " had the highest total carotenoid and "Gogeh Germez" and "Japanese" had the highest vitamin C content among investigated cultivars. By identification of superior cultivars In terms of phytochemical compounds, these cultivars can be used in breeding programs to improve these nutritional quality of fruits. The results showed that the major phenolic compounds were gathered on the skin of plum fruits. Hence the "Ozarak" cultivar having the highest a*color index of fruit skin had the highest total phenol and antioxidant capacity among the investigated cultivars but "Gogeh Germez" by having the highest a*color index of fruit flesh and anthocyanins content higher than "Ozarak" cultivar, had low phenolic content and antioxidant capacity compared to the "Ozarak".

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• antioxidant capacity
• Anthocyanins
• Carotenoids
• Total phenolics
• vitamin C

مراجع

1- Arion C.M., Tabart J., Kevers C., Niculaua M., Filimon R., Beceanu D., and Dommes J. 2014. Antioxidant potential of different plum cultivars during storage. Food Chemistry, 146:485–491.

2- Cevallos- Casals B.A., Byrne D., Okie W.R., and Zevallos L.C. 2006. Selecting new peach and plum genotypes rich in phenolic compounds and enhanced functional properties. Food Chemistry, 96:273–280.

3- Chun O.K., Kim D.O., Moon H.Y., Kang H.G., and Lee C.Y. 2003. Contribution of individual polyphenolics to total antioxidant capacity of plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51: 7240-7245.

4- Drake S. R., Proebsting E. L., and Spayd S. E. 1982. Maturity index for the colour grade of canned dark sweet cherries. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 107-180.

5- Drogoudi P.D., Vemmos S., Pantelidis G., Petri E., Tzoutzoukou C., and Karayiannis I. 2008. Physical characters and antioxidant, sugar, and mineral nutrient contents in fruit from 29 apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars and hybrids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56:10754–10760.

6- FAO Yearbook. 2013. FAO Statisitcal Yearbook, online access: http//apps. Fao. Org.

7- Forough S., Noori Amlashi S., Rabiei V., and Bakhshi D. 2014. Evaluation of some qualitative characteristics of wild plum genotypes in northern Iran. Biological Forum – An International Journal 6(1): 92-99.

8- Gil M. I., Barbran F. A. T., Pierce B. H., and Kader A. A. 2002. Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50: 4976-4982.

9- Goncalves B., Silva A. P., Moutinho-Pereira J., Bacelar E., Rosa E., and Meyer A. S. 2007. Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the evolution of colour and anthocyanins in cherries (Prunus avium L.). Food Chemistry, 10:976–984.

10- Hartmann W., and Neumuller M. 2009. Plum breeding. In: Jain, S.M., and Priyadarshan P.M: Breeding plantation tree crops: Temperate species, 161-232.

11- Kayano S., Kikuzaki H., Fukutsaka N., Mitani T., and Nakatani N. 2002. Antioxidant activity of prune (Prunus domestica L.) constituents and a new synergist. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50:3708-3712.

12- Kim D.O., Chun O.K., Kim Y.J., Moon H.Y., and Lee C.Y. 2003. Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51:6509–15.

13- Lancaster J. E., Lister C. E., Reay P. F., and Trigs C. M. 1997. Influence of pigment composition on skin colour in a wide range of fruit and vegetables. Journal of Horticultural Science, 122:594–598.

14- Manganaris G.A., Vicente A.R., and Crisosto C.H. 2008. Effect of preharvest and post-harvest conditions and treatments on plum fruit quality. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 3:0-10.

15- Okie W.R., and Hancock J.F. 2008. Plums, In: Hancock, J.F. Temperate fruit crop breeding germplasm to genomics. Michigan state university, 337-357.

16- Ozturk B., Kucuker E., Karaman E., and Ozkan K. 2012. The effects of cold storage and aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) on bioactive compounds of plum fruit (Prunus salicina Lindell cv. ‘Black Amber’). Postharvest Biology and Technology, 72:35–41.

17- Rupasinghe H. P. V., Jayasankar S., and Lay W. 2006. Variation in total phenolics and antioxidant capacity among European plum genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 108, 243–246.

18- Serrano M., Guillen F., Martinez-Romero D., Castillo S., and Valero D. 2005. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53:2741–2745.

19- Tomas-Barberan F.A., Gil M.I., Cremin P., Waterhouse A.L., Hess-Pierce B., and Kader A.A. 2001. HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 49:4748-4760.

20- Venter A., Joubert E., and Beer D.D. 2014. Nutraceutical Value of Yellow- and Red-Fleshed South African Plums (Prunus salicina Lindl.): Evaluation of total Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Composition Molecules, 19: 3084-3109.

21- Voca S., Galic A., Sindrak Z., Dobricevic N., Pliestic S., and Druzic J. 2009. Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of three plum cultivars. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 74: 273-276.

22- Vangdal E., and S limestad R. 2005. Methods to determine antioxidative capacity in fruit. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 14:123-131.

23- Wang H., Cao G., and Prior R. L. 1996. Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44:701–705.

24- Williams G.M., and Jeffrey A.M. 2000. Oxidative DNA damage: endogenous and chemically induced. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 32:283–292.