اثر بسترهای مختلف بر ویژگی‌های خاک و صفات فیزیولوژیکی گیاهان ختمی (Aleca rosea L.) تحت تنش خشکی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• تکتم اورعی ¹
• محمود شور ²
• علی تهرانی فر ²
• سید حسین نعمتی ¹
• عطیه اورعی ¹

¹ گروه علوم باغبانی و مهندسی فضای سبز، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

² گروه مهندسی علوم باغبانی و فضای سبز، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2021.71383.1073

چکیده

کاربرد مواد آلی به‌عنوان یک استراتژی مناسب به‌منظور کاهش تخریب خاک در آب‌وهوای خشک و نیمه‌ خشک ارائه شده است. به‌منظور بررسی اثر آبیاری و بسترهای کشت بر رشد دو اکوتیپ ختمی زینتی، آزمایشی در شرایط مزرعه تعریف شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل دو اکوتیپ (̓مشهد̒ و ̓تهران̒)، سه سطح رطوبتی (80، 60 و 40 درصد ظرفیت زراعی) و چهار بستر کشت (خاک، خاک + کود حیوانی، خاک + شلتوک برنج، خاک + کاه و کلش گندم) بودند. عناصر ماکرو (نیتروژن، فسفر و پتاسیم)، هدایت الکتریکی، pH خاک و صفات فیزیولوژیکی گیاه (نشت الکترولیت، محتوای نسبی آب، پرولین، کربوهیدرات) و وزن خشک اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که اثرات سه‌گانه اکوتیپ× تنش خشکی × بسترهای کشت بر تغییرات میزان عناصر نیتروژن، فسفر و پتاسیم خاک مزرعه در پایان آزمایش معنی‌دار نشد، امّا بیشترین تغییرات این عناصر در بستر خاک + کود حیوانی مشاهده شد و همچنین، این تغییرات در خاک حاوی اکوتیپ مشهد بیشتر بود. میزان شوری بستر خاک + کود حیوانی در هر دو اکوتیپ نسبت به بستر خاک، 78 درصد افزایش یافت. از طرفی، تغییرات اسیدیته خاک در سطح آبیاری 40 درصد نسبت به شاهد کمتر بود و این تغییرات در بستر خاکی 60 درصد کاهش یافت. تمامی پارامترهای فیزیولوژیکی و رشدی گیاهان ختمی تحت تیمارهای آزمایش قرار گرفت و بیشترین میزان شاخص کلروفیل (68)، محتوای نسبی آب (72 درصد) و وزن خشک (95 گرم) در اکوتیپ مشهد تحت تیمار 80 درصد ظرفیت زراعی در بستر خاک + کود حیوانی و بیشترین کربوهیدرات (82 میلی‌گرم در گرم وزن خشک) در اکوتیپ مشهد تحت تیمار 40 درصد ظرفیت زراعی در بستر خاک + کود حیوانی به ثبت رسید. بدین منظور، کاربرد کود حیوانی همراه با خاک با فراهم نمودن عناصر ماکرو اثرات منفی تنش خشکی را کاهش می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• ختمی زینتی
• عناصر غذایی
• کم‌آبیاری
• مواد آلی

موضوعات

• گیاهان زینتی و فضای سبز

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Different Growth Medium on Soil Properties and Physiological Traits of Hollyhocks (Alcea rosea L.) under Drought Stress

نویسندگان [English]

• Toktam Oraee ¹
• Mahmood Shoor ²
• Ali Tehranifar ²
• Seyyed Hossein Nemati ¹
• Atiyeh Oraee ¹

¹ Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

² Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
 Climate change predictions indicate that drought and extreme heatwaves will become more frequent and extreme in many regions. Drought is the main abiotic stress that severely reduces plant yield across the globe. Thus, this may have negative consequences for the agricultural soils, as it limits the availability of water and nutrients to soil microorganisms and plants that develop on these soils. To cope with this situation, the use of organic amendments is the best option. Recent studies have shown that the application of organic fertilizers can affect soil moisture and thus, mitigate the negative effect of climate change on that parameter. Organic amendments increase soil organic matter content thus improving soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, and therefore, can confer drought resistance to soils. The application of organic residues has been presented as a great strategy against soil degradation in semiarid environments. However, the interactions between organic amendments and drought in hollyhock plants are not fully known. Here, we evaluate whether the organic amendment influences the physiological traits of hollyhocks and soil properties under drought conditions.
 
Materials and Methods
 The experiment was conducted in the research field at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. The experiment consisted of three factors (cultivars, organic amendments, and drought) with organic amendments and drought having four and three levels, respectively. Drought treatments were controlled by a TDR at 80, 60, and 40% FC. The three sources of organic amendments were used cow manure, rice hull and wheat straw. Seeds were planted in cocopeat, perlite, and peat mixture trays in the greenhouse with an average temperature of 20 °C and under a photoperiod of 14 hours of light and 10 hours of darkness with a light intensity of 400 μmol^-1 m². In the 5-6 leaf stage, seedlings were transferred in pots (18 cm high and 8 cm in diameter) containing field soil. The plants were transferred to the field with four different substrates (field soil, field soil + manure, field soil + rice hull, and field soil + wheat straw) and were exposed to drought stress for one month during the flowering stage. This analysis examined both the physical and chemical properties of the soil, including changes in the macroelements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.
 
Results and Discussion
 Soil nitrogen changes were significantly affected by the interactions of ecotype with drought, ecotype with the medium, and drought stress with medium. The highest nitrogen changes were recorded in Mashhad ecotype under 80% FC. Nitrogen content in amended soil had an increasing trend during the experiment, but the amount of nitrogen had a decreasing trend in soil. In all media under stress, the amount of soil phosphorus was increased and the highest amount of phosphorus was observed in soil + manure at all irrigation regimes. The highest amount of potassium in both ecotypes was observed in soil + manure. The amount of potassium in amended soils under stress significantly increased, but in all organic amendments with increasing drought stress from 80 to 40% FC, the potassium content decreased. In both ecotypes, soil salinity was increased in all culture media. Han et al. (2016) stated that the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the amended soil was higher than the substrates containing chemical fertilizer. The medium EC was alkaline at the end of the experiment and the salinity of the culture medium increased compared to the control. This study revealed a negative correlation between electrolyte leakage and dry weight in hollyhock plants. Furthermore, all measured physiological and growth parameters were significantly affected by the treatments. Notably, the Mashhad ecotype grown in soil supplemented with animal manure at 80% field capacity (FC) exhibited the highest levels of physiological traits (SPAD and relative water content) and growth index (dry weight).The application of manure + soil by providing macro elements reduces the negative effects of drought stress.
 
Conclusion
 The type of crops grown in arid and semi-arid regions should be reconsidered. Also, some plants with high water requirements should be replaced with plants with low and unexpected water requirements. Because hollyhocks are low-expected plants that grow well in drought areas, so they can be considered as suitable species for cultivation in low-input systems and can tolerate drought situations by 40% FC in amended soil.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Nutrients
• Organic matter
• Ornamental Hollyhock
• Stress

©2021 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

مراجع

1. Ahmad, I., & Maathuis, F.J. (2014). Cellular and tissue distribution of potassium: physiological relevance, mechanisms and regulation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 171(9), 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.016
2. Ahmadian, A., Ghanbari, A., Siahsar, , Haydari, M., Ramroodi, M., & Mousavinik, S.M. (2011). Study of chamomiles yield and its components under drought stress and organic and inorganic fertilizers usage and their residue. Journal of Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 3(2), 23-28.
3. Ahmed, B., Roy, C.D., Subramaniam, S.A., Ganie, D., Kwatra, D., Dixon, D., Anant, A., Zarqar, M.A., & Umar, S. (2016). An ornamental plant targets epigenetic signaling to block cancer stem cell driven colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 37(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgw009
4. Ajoudan, M. (2005). Effect of high quality organic matter and different amounts on soil physicochemical properties and potato yield. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran. 140 pp. (In Persian with English abstract)
5. Altaf, A., Gull, S., Zhu, X., Zhu, M., Rasool, G., Ibrahim, M.E.H., Aleem, M., Uddin, S., Saeed, A., Zaman Shah, A., Zada, A., Quan, M., Yonggang, D., Xu, D., & Chen, L. (2021). Study of the effect of peg-6000 imposed drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars using relative water content (RWC) and proline content analysis. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 58(1), 357-367. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/21.953
6. Asghari, F. (2014). Evaluation of changes in vegetative and reproductive growth and the amount of Hollyhock mucilage(Althaea rosea) under salinity. M.Sc. Thesis.. Baharan Non-Governmental Institute of Higher Education, Faculty of Science, Gorgan. (In Persian with English abstract)
7. Bahrami-Rad, S., & Hajiboland, R. (2017). Effect of potassium application in drought-stressed tobacco (Nicotiana rustica) plants, Comparison of root with foliar application. Annals of Agricultural Science, 62(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2017.08.001
8. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., & Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
9. Besharati, J., Sehirmardi, M., Meftahizadeh, H., Ardakani, M.D., & Ghorbanpour, M. (2021). Changes in growth and quality performance of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) in response to soil amendments with hydrogel and compost under drought stress. South African Journal of Botany, 145, 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.03.018
10. Burt, S.A., & Reinders, R.D. (2003). Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157: H7. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 36(3), 162-167. https://doi.org/1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01285.x
11. Cakmak, I. (2005). The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 168(4), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485
12. Chen, C.T., Lee, C. L., & Yeh, D.M. (2018). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, or magnesium deficiency on growth and photosynthesis of Eustoma. HortScience, 53(6), 795-798. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12947-18
13. Cui, G., Xiao, X., Zhang, W., Lang, D., Li, Z., & Zhang, X. (2021). Exogenous silicon relieve drought stress and salt stress of Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedlings by regulating proline metabolism and nitrogen assimilation. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnologyhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2021.1921624
14. Ebell, F. (1969). Variation in total soluble sugars of conifer tissues with method of analysis. Phytochemistry, 8(1), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85818-5
15. Fanaei,R., Galavi, M., Kafi, M., Ghanbari, A., & Bonjar, G. (2009). Amelioration of water stress by potassium fertilizer in two oilseed species. International Journal of Plant Production, 3(2), 41-54. (In Persian with English abstract)
16. Ghobadi, M., Taherabadi, S., Ghobadi, M.E., Mohammadi, G.R., & Jalali-Honarmand, S. (2013). Antioxidant capacity, photosynthetic characteristics and water relations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cultivars in response to drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products, 50, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.009
17. Gong, X., Chao, L., Zhou, M., Hong, M., Luo, L., Wang, L., Ying, W., Cai, J., Songjie, G., & Hong, F. (2011). Oxidative damages of maize seedlings caused by exposure to a combination of potassium deficiency and salt stress. Plant Soil, 340(1), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0616-7
18. Han, S.H., An, J.Y., Hwang, J., Kim, S.B., & Park, B.B. (2016). The effect of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) in a nursery system. Forest Science and Technology, 12(3), 1-7.
19. Heidari, N., Pouryousef, M., & Tavakoli, A. (2014). The effect of drought stress on photosynthesis, its related parameters, and relative water content of anise (Pimpinella anisum). Journal of Plant Research, 7(27), 829-839. (In Persian with English abstract)
20. Hosseinzadeh, M.H., Ghalavand, A., Boojar M.M.A., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., & Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A. (2021). Application of manure and biofertilizer to improve soil properties and increase grain yield, essential oil and ω3 of purslane (Portulaca oleracea) under drought stress. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 104633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104633
21. Hussain, L., Akash, M.S.H., Tahir, M., Rehman, K., & Ahmed, K.Z. (2014). Hepatoprotective effects of methanolic extract of Alcea rosea against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, 9(3), 322-327.
22. Jafari, S., Garmdareh, S.E.H., & Azadegan, B. (2019). Effects of drought stress on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of stock plant (Matthiola incana). Scientia Horticulturae, 253, 128-133.
23. Jie, Z., Yuncong, Y., Streeter, J.G., & Ferree, D.C. (2010). Influence of soil drought stress on photosynthesis, carbohydrates and the nitrogen and phophorus absorb in different section of leaves and stem of Fugi/M.9EML, a young apple seedling. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(33), 5320-5325.
24. Kane,A., Bradford, M.A., Fuller, E., Oldfield, E.E., & Wood, S.A. (2021). Soil organic matter protects US maize yields and lowers crop insurance payouts under drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044018
25. Kang, S.M., Latif Khan, A., Waqas, M., You, Y.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.G., Hamayun, M., & Lee, I.J. (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria reduce adverse effects of salinity and osmotic stress by regulating phytohormones and antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 673-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.894587
26. Kazemalilou, S., Lajayer, B.A., & Ghorbanpour, M. (2021). Increasing the tolerance of water-deficit stress in plants with integrated application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. In Agri-Based Bioeconomy (pp. 299-312). CRC Press. 1st Edition.
27. Khadem, A., Golchin, A., Shafiee, S., Zare, A. (2014). The effect of animal manure and sulfur on nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays). Applied Field Crop Research,. 27(103), 1-11. (In Persian with English abstract)
28. Kirchmann, H. (2021). Revisiting the original reasons for excluding inorganic fertilizers in organic farming—Why the ban is not consistent with our current scientific understanding. Outlook on Agriculture, 50, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211020025
29. Kozlowski, T.T., & Pallardy, S.G. (2002). Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. The Botanical Review, 68(2), 270-334. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2002)068[0270:AAAROW]2.0.CO;2
30. Luciano-Mateo, F., Hernández-Aguilera, A., Cabre, N., Camps, J., Fernández-Arroyo, S., Lopez-Miranda, J., Menendez, A.J., & Joven, J. (2017). Nutrients in energy and one-carbon metabolism: Learning from metformin users. Nutrients, 9(2), 121.
31. Mahajan, A., & Gupta R.D. (2009). Bio-fertilizer, their kinds and requirements in India. In: Mahajan A, Gupta RD (Ed) Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) in a sustainable rice-wheat cropping system. Springer Netherland.
32. Majid, A., Rather, B., Masood, A., & Khan, N. (2021). Abscisic acid and nitrogen showed coordinated action on antioxidant system and osmotic adjustment to alleviate salinity inhibited photosynthetic potential in Brassica juncea Preprints, 2021060147. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202106.0147.v1
33. Marschner, H. (1995). Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2^th Academic Press, London. Sandiego, Ca pp, 379-396.
34. Massoud, H.Y., Sharef, El-Deen, M.N., Yousef, R.M.M., & Megahed, M.S. (2014). Effect of water requirement and organic fertilization on growth and yeild of marigold (Calendula officinalis) plants under sandy soil conditions. Journal of Plant Production, 5(11), 1849-1865.
35. McCready, R.M., Guggolz, J., Silviera, V., & Owens, H.S. (1950). Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Analytical Chemistry, 22(9), 1156-1158. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60045a016
36. Mehregan, B., Mousavi Fard, S., & Rezai Nezhad, A. (2018). The effect of foliar application of potassium silicate on some morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Alternanthera repens under drought stress. Journal of Crops Improvement, 20(1), 314-299.
37. Mohamed, H.I., El-Sayed, A.A., Rady, M.M., Caruso, G., Sekara, A., & Abdelhamid, M.T. (2021). Coupling effects of phosphorus fertilization source and rate on growth and ion accumulation of common bean under salinity stress.Plant Biology, 4(9), e11463. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11463
38. Najafi, N., & Mardomi, S. (2013). Effect of sunflower, livestock manure and sewage sludge on the availability of elements, pH and EC of an alkaline soil. Applied Soil Research, 1(1), 1-16. (In Persian with English abstract)
39. Najafi, N., & Parsazadeh, M. (2011). The effect of nitrogen forms and pH of nutrient solutions on EC and pH changes in spinach rhizosphere in hydroponic cultivation. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Crops, 2(59), 29-44. (In Persian with English abstract)
40. Oraee, A., & Tehranifar, A. (2020). Evaluating the potential drought tolerance of pansy through its physiological and biochemical responses to drought and recovery periods. Scientia Horticulturae, 265, 109225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109225
41. Ors, S., Ekinci, M., Yildirim, E., Sahin, U., Turan, M., & Dursun, A. (2021). Interactive effects of salinity and drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiology of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings. South African Journal of Botany, 137, 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.10.031
42. Pakravan,, & Ghahreman, A. (2003). Some new combinations and synonyms in Alcea (Malvaceae) from Iran. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 104(B), 713-716.
43. Peng, J., Feng, Y., Wang, X., Li, J., Xu, G., Phonenasy, S., Luo, Q., Han, Z., & Lu, W. (2021). Effects of nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic pigment, leaf fluorescence characteristics, and yield of indica hybrid rice and their interrelations. Science Report, 11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86858-z
44. Rafie Rad, Z., Dordipour, E., & Tajvar, Y. (2016). Evaluation of low temperature tolerance indices in seedlings of Citrus aurantium under potassium nitrate nutrition. Journal of Plant Physiology, 7(2), 2007-2015.
45. Razaq, M., Zhang, P., Shen, H.L., & Salahuddinn. (2017). Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morophology Acer Plos One, 12(2), 1-13.
46. Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K.V., & Vive kanandan, M. (2004). Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161(11), 1189-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
47. Saud, S., Fahad, S., Cui, G., Yajun, C., & Anwar, S. (2020). Determining nitrogen isotopes discrimination under drought stress on enzymatic activities, nitrogen isotope abundance and water contents of Kentucky bluegrass. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-16.
48. Shajim, H., Chandranm, V., & Mathew, L. (2021). Organic fertilizers as a route to controlled release of nutrients. Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Academic Press, 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819555-0.00013-3
49. Tarahomi, G., Lahoty, E., & Abasi, F. (2010). Investigation of the effects of drought stress on changes in soluble sugars, rate chlorophyll and potassium in Salvia leriifolia Journal of Animal Physiology and Development, 3(3), 1-7.
50. Teixeira Filho, M.C.M., Buzetti, S., Andeotti, M., Arf, O., & DeSa, M.E. (2011). Application times, sources and doses of nitrogen on wheat cultivars under no till in the Cerrado region. Ciência Rural, 41(8), 1375-1382.
51. Turner, N.C. (2018). Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment – 40 years of progress. Journal of Experimental Boany 69(13), 3223-3233. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery181
52. Wang, Zheng Q., Shen Q., & Guo S. (2013_. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(4), 7370-7390.
53. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., & Altman, A. (2003). Plant responses to drough, salinity and extreme temperature: Toward genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5
54. Xu, X., Du, X., Wang, F., Sha, J., Chen, Q., Tian, G., Zhu, Z., Ge, S., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Effects of potassium levels on plant growth, accumulation and distribution of carbon, and nitrate metabolism in apple dwarf rootstock seedlings. Frontiersz in Plant Science, 11, 904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00904