اثر اسید استیک بر pH محلول کود آهن (سکوسترین و نانو) و تأثیر آن بر خصوصیات کمی و کیفی توت‌فرنگی رقم ’دیامنت‘

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم باعبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 گروه علوم باغبانی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

3 گروه علوم باغبانی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

4 گروه علوم خاک ، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

چکیده

به­منظور بررسی اثر اسید استیک بر pH محلول­غذایی آهن (سکوسترین و نانو کود) و تأثیر آن بر ویژگی­های کمی و کیفی توت­فرنگی رقم ’دیامنت‘، این پژوهش به صورت کرت­های دوبار خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی در طی سال­های ۱۳۹۴ تا۱۳۹۶ به اجرا در آمد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل محلول­پاشی سطوح آهن (سکوسترین 25 گرم و نانو 1 گرم) درکرت‌هایی اصلی، سطوح اسید استیک (شاهد، 1، 2و 3 درصد) در کرت­های فرعی و سطوح صابون کشاورزی مویان (شاهد و 5/7 درصد) در کرت­هایی فرعی­فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که اثر متقابل سه جانبه محلول­پاشی اسید استیک با آهن همراه با صابون کشاورزی بر میانگین غلظت آهن برگ و تعداد میوه در سطح احتمال پنج درصد و در کلروفیل کل در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی­دار بود که بهترین نتیجه در صفت­های ذکر شده از ترکیب تیماری 2 درصد اسید استیک با آهن سکوسترین همراه با 5/7 درصد صابون کشاورزی مویان حاصل شد. اثر متقابل دو جانبه اسید استیک و نوع آهن بر صفت­های pH آب میوه، حجم میوه، وزن تر و خشک میوه در سطح احتمال پنج درصد و در عملکرد در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی‌دار بودند. در صفت­های حجم میوه، وزن تر میوه، وزن خشک میوه و عملکرد بهترین نتایج مربوط به ترکیب تیماری 2 درصد اسید استیک با کود آهن سکوسترین بود.،ولی در صفت pH آب میوه بهترین نتیجه از ترکیب تیماری 3 درصد اسید استیک با آهن سکوسترین بدست آمد. اثر متقابل دو جانبه عنصر آهنو صابون کشاورزی بر میزان مواد جامد محلول در سطح احتمال پنج درصد و اسیدکل میوه‌ی توت‌فرنگی در سطح احتمال یک­درصد معنی‌دار بودند. در مورد صفت­های مواد جامد محلول و اسیدیته قابل تیتراسیون، تیمار آهن سکوسترین و صابون کشاورزی مویان، بهترین نتیجه را داشتند. با توجه به نتایج حاصل از این بررسی، ترکیب تیماری 2 درصد اسید استیک با آهن سکوسترین همراه با 5/7 درصد صابون کشاورزی مویان به دلیل کاهش کشش سطح برگ موجب بهبود قدرت جذب آهن محلول غذایی و افزایش ویژگی­های کمی و کیفی توت­فرنگی توصیه می­گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Acetic Acid on the pH of Iron Fertilizer Solution (Sequestrin and Nano) and Its Effect on the Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) cv. Diamant

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Jafari 1
  • A.A. Shokouhian 2
  • E. Chamani 3
  • A. Ghavedal 4
1 Department of Horticultural sciences, , University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Department of Horticultural sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
4 Department of Soil Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
چکیده [English]

Introduction
 Iron has a significant effect on the quantity and quality of agriculture products. Factors affecting the absorption of this element increase its efficiency. Meanwhile, the pH of the nutrient solution plays an important role in the absorption of iron. Iron is one of the essential elements for plant growth and plays an essential role in chloroplasts. Due to iron deficiency, the activity of several enzymes such as catalase, cytochrome and oxidase and ferroxin is significantly reduced. The amount of iron in the soil is high, but plants only absorb two-capacity of soluble soil, which is negligible compared to the total iron. Soil environmental conditions affect the amount of iron by the plant, so it is difficult to control the uptake of iron by the plant. It has the highest ability to absorb iron and manganese at pH less than 6. For this reason, acetic acid was used to stabilize the pH of the solution. Acetic Acid is a polar solvent and an organic compound. The use of inexpensive organic acid and citric acid in agriculture, despite its positive effects on calcareous soils and their reasonable price is still not common in Iran. Acetic acid has a carboxylic group and therefore has all the properties of an acid.
Materials and methods
 This experiment was carried out in the form of double split-split plot in a completely randomized block design on a strawberry plant of diamant cultivar in the research station of Mohaghegh Ardabili University during the years 2015- 2017. Factors included Acetic Acid (0, 1, 2 and %3), iron in two levels (Sequestrin 25gr and Nano 1gr) along with two levels of agricultural soap agents (0 and % 7/5) as foliar spraying. Foliar application of pH nutrient solution from the three-leaf stage of plant (mid-April) to the end of May a total of five times 10 days apart in both years. Two weeks after the last foliar application (June of the second year) plant growth indices including, total chlorophyll, number of fruits per plant, fruit pH, total acidity, soluble solids, fruit volume, fruit fresh weight, fruit dry weight, and leaf iron content and fruit yield per plant was measured.
Result
 The results of this study showed that the three-way interaction of foliar application of Acetic Acid with iron with agricultural Soap on the average concentration of leaf iron and number of fruits at the probability level was %5 and in total chlorophyll at the %1 probability level was significant, the best result in the mentioned traits was the combination of treatment of Acetic Acid %2 with Sequestrin iron with soap Moyan (%7/5). The interaction effect of Acetic Acid and iron type on traits of fruit pH, fruit volume, fruit fresh and dry weight at %5 probability level and in yield at %1 probability level were significant. Fruit volume, fruit fresh weight and fruit dry weight and yield showed the best results due to treatment combination of %2 Acetic Acid with Sequestrin iron fertilizer. But for fruit pH trait, the best results were related to the treatment of Acetic Acid %3 on the leave of Sequestrin iron. The Interaction of the iron and agricultural Soap was significant on the amount of soluble solids at %5 probability level and the total acidity strawberries fruit was significant at %1 probability level. In the case of soluble soild and Acidity, Sequestrin iron treatment and agricultural soap had the best results. According to the results of this study, the combination %2 Acetic Acid with of iron fertilizer Sequesterin in combination with agricultural soap Moyan (%7/5) due to the reduction in leaf area tensions improves the obsorption of iron and the quantitative and quality characteristics strawberries.
Conclusion
 Based on the findings of this research, it can be concluded that Acetic acid %2, has better result on the absorption of iron fertilizer, along with agricultural soap (% 7/5) application than other treatments and qualitative traits of strawberry fruit. In treatment %2 Acetic acid most measured traits such as total chlorophyll, leaf iron, fresh weight, fruit dry weight and yield has shown a significant increase. Acetic acid by reducing the pH of the cell sauce and increasing the activity of the reductase enzyme increase the iron solubility and easily provides the iron to the plant. Due to the pH alkalinity of most soils in Iran, the use of Acetic acid in iron nutrient solution on the absorption of iron Sequestrin in combination with % 7/5 of agricultural soap due to having a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic with %40 to %50 increase in effective of foliar fertilizers. As a result, with more absorption it can be an advanced approach to better absorption of iron by plant and increase the quantity and quality in the product.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chlorophyll
  • Vitamin C
  • Yield
  1. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
  2. AOAC. (1989). Official methods of analysis, 14th (ed.). Association of Official Agricultural Chemist, Washington. DC. pp. 241-254.
  3. Amaliotis, D., Velemis, D., Bladenopoulou, S., & Karapetsas, N. (2002). Leaf nutrient levels of strawberries ( cv) in relation to crop yield. Acta Horticulturae 567: 447-450. https://doi.org/10.17660/Acta Hortic.2002. 567.93.
  4. Abedi Geshlage, E., & Tafazole Bandary, E. (2004). The effect of foliar application of ferrous sulfate and citric acid on the quantitative and qualitative properties of tomatoes. Sciences and Natural Resource 4(11): 71-80. (In Persian)
  5. Àlvarez-Fernàndez, , Abadía, J., & Abadía, A. (2006). Iron deficiency, fruit yield and fruit quality. Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizosphere Microorganisms pp: 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4743-6-4.
  6. Ali, A., Perveen, S., Shah, S N M., Zhang, Z., Wahid, F., Shah, M., & Majid, A. (2014). Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on fruit quality of peach. American Journal of Plant 5: 1258-1264. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.59138.
  7. Askari Sarcheshmeh, M.A., Shokri Heydari, H., Babalar, M., Ahmadi, A., & Ranjbar Malidarreh, T. (2020). The effect of pre-harvest spray of iron sequestrine and salicylic acid on some quality characteristics of (Zaferani) peach fruit during storage. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 2(51): 345-354. (In Persian)
  8. Bavarsco, L., Giachin, E., & Colla, R. (1999). Iron chlorosis pared in grapevine. Journal Plant Nutrition 22: 1589-1594.
  9. Babaye, Z., Hidare, M., Salehi Salme, M.R., Nadeyan, H.A., & Alime, S. (2015). Effect of iron fertilizer application quality on strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch) Diamant. 9th Congress Horticulture Ahvaz. Iran. (In Persian)
  10. Cesco, S., Nikolic, M., Römheld, V., Varanini, Z., & Pinton, R. (2002). Uptake of 59 Fe from soluble 59 Fehumate complexes by cucumber and barley plants. Plant and Soil 241(1):121-128. https://doi.org/10. 1023/A:1016061003397.
  11. Etmadiyan, M., & Hasani, A. (2016). Necessity of production and application of organic acids in Iranian soils. 3th conference in the new findings in the environment and agricultural ecosystem. http:// civilica. Com/doc/586813/. (In Persian)
  12. Fiezie,, Keshavarz, P., & Amirahmadie, A. (2007). Study effect application of sol fat iron and sulfate Zn fertilizers on quality and yield crop sugar beet. 10th International on Press research soil and water. Pp. 617–618. (In Persian)
  13. FAO. (2017). faostat Agricultural Statics Database. http://faostat3.fao.org/. accessed on April 15. 2016.
  14. Hemantaranjan, A., & Garg, O.K. (1988). Iron and Zinc fertilization with reference to the grain quality of Triticum aestivum Journal Plant Nutrition 11: 1439-1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168809363900.
  15. Hall, A.J., McPherson, H.G., Crawford, R.A., & Seager, N.G. (1996). Using early-season measurements to estimate fruit volume at harvest in kiwifruit. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticulture Science 24(4): 379-391.
  16. Hanie, A., Javadie, A., & Davarie, H. (2013). Botany and soil. Second edition. Press sobhan: pp.52-57. (In Persian)
  17. Hosenei, Y., & Bahadori, M. (2015). The effects of Source, Amount and method of iron application on quantitative and qualitative characteristics and profitability rat oF Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch) Science and Technology of Greenhouse Cultivation 7(28).
  18. Johnson, R.S., Mitchell, F.G., & Costa, G. (1997). Nitrogen influences kiwifruit storage life. Acta Horticulture 444: 285-291. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.444.44.
  19. Jokar, L., Ronagie, A., Karimiyan, N., & Fasayie, R. (2013). The Effect of different levels of iron from iron than nanoparticles and iron secostrin on the growth and concentration of some vegetable bean nutrients in a calcareous soil. Science and technology of greenhouse cultivation. 6th year Number 22 pp. 9-10. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.eigcst.6.2.9.
  20. Jokar, M. (2020). Application of insecticide soap in important cotton sucker control. Research Organization, Training and Promotion of Agriculture, Agricultural Education Publishing. Tehran, Iran. pp. 20. (In Persian)
  21. Khoie, S. (1992). Principles of citrus fruit nutrition ministry of culture and Islamic Guidance. pp.111-132. (In Persian)
  22. Kalesck, H., Honer, W., & Schaller, K. (2004). Effects of bicarbonate and phosphate on iron cholorosis of grap vines with special regard to the susceptibilty of two root stocks. Part 11. Pot experiments. Journal Plant Nutrtion 10: 231-249. https://doi.org/10. 1080/01904168709363568.
  23. Kazemi, M. (2013). Effects of Zn, Fe and their Combination Treatments on the growth and yield of tomato. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 3(1): 109-114.
  24. Kobraee, S., NoorMohamadi, N., Heidari Sharifabad, H., Darvish Kajori, F., & Delkhosh, B. (2011). Influence of micronutrient fertilizers on soybean nutrient composition. Iranian Journal Horticulture Sciences Technological 4: 763-769. https://doi.org/10. 1007/1-4020-4743-6-4.
  25. Karimi, R. (2017). Potassium-induced freezing tolerance is associated with endogenous abscisic acid, polyaminesand soluble sugars changes in grapevine. Scientia Horticulturae 215: 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.12.018.
  26. Malakouti, M.J., & Tabatabaei, S.J. (1999). Proper nutrition of fruit trees for improving the yield and quality of horticultural crops in Iran. Agricultural Education Publications. Karaj, Iran. 5: 51-56.
  27. Minchin, P.E.H., Richardson, A.C., Patterson, K.J., & Martin, P.J. (2003). Prediction of final weight for Actinidia chinensis 'Hort16A' fruit. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticulture Science 31(2): 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2003.9514247.
  28. Mirsolimani,, & Tafazoli, E. (2005). Effect of nutrient solution pH on the absorption of iron in four cultivars of grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Research and construction in agriculture and horticulture pp 71. (In Persian)
  29. Mohamadipoor, R., Sedaghathoor, S., & Mahboub Khomami, A. (2013). Effect of application of iron fertilizers in two methods foliar and soil application' on growth characteristics of (Spathyphyllum illusion). Iranian Journal Horticulture Sciences Technological 3(1): 232-240.
  30. Mansouri, S., Babalar, M., Kalantari, S., & Askary Sarcheshmeh, M.A. (2017). Effect of the foliar spraying of iron and soil application of the ammonium nitrate on postharvest quality of apple Delbar stival. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 48: 503-515.
  31. Olsson, M.E., Ekval, J.M., Gustavsson, K., Nilsson, J., Pillai, D., Sjoholm, I., Svensson, U., Akesson, B., & Nyman, M. (2004). Antioxidants, low molecular weight carbohydrates, and total antioxidant capacity in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch) effects of cultivar, ripening, and storage. Agriculture Food Chemistry 52: 2490-2498. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030461e.
  32. Prendergast, P.T., McAneney, K.J., Astill, K.J., Wilson, A.D., & Barber, R.F. (1987). Kiwifruit water extraction and fruit expansion. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15(3): 345-350. https://doi.org/10. 1080/03015521.1987.10425580.
  33. Pestana, M., de Varennes, A., & Faria, E.A. (2003). Diagnosis and correction of iron chlorosis in fruit trees: A review. Journal of Food Agriculture and Enviroment 1(1): 46-51. http://hd1.handle. net/10400.1/7420.
  34. Pozeshe, R., Zabehei, H., Moghadam, M.R., Rajabzade, M., & Moghtari, A. (2009). Yield and yield components of grape (Vitis vinefera peykami cv) as affected by foliar application of zinc, humic acid and acetic acid. Journal of Horticultural Science 25(3): 351-360. (In Persian)
  35. Rutter, K.B., Williams, D.B., & Goldstein, J.T. (1988). Low temperature phase transformation in the metallic phases of iron and stony-iron meteorites. Geochemical at Cosmochimica Acid 52(3): 617-625.
  36. Rasolie, M.J., & Malakooti, M.J. (1999). Necessity to provide micro nutrient and discuse control through injection into the trunk of fruit trees. Journal of Water and Soil Research Institute 115. (In Persian)
  37. Roosta, H.R., & Karimi, H.R. (2012). Effects of alkali-stress on ungrafted and grafted cucumber plants: using two types of local squash as rootstock. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35(12): 1843-1852.
  38. Ranjbar,, Eshgie, N., & Rostami, M. (2012). The effect of nickel sulfate and urea on reproductive growth and qualitative and quantitative character of strawberry fruit of (Pajaro variety) greenhouse cultivation Journal of Greenhouse Culture Science and Technology 2(3): 41-48. (In Persian). http://jspi.iut.ac.ir/article-1-238-fa.html.
  39. Rezaei, S., Amiri, M.E., Bahari, A., Razavi, F., & Soleimani Aghdam, M. (2020). Influence of iron leaf nutrition on chlorophyll content and some antioxidant enzyme activities of strawberry fruitcv. Camarosa. Horticultural Plants Nutrition 3(2): 1-16. (In Persian). https://doi.org/1022070/HPN.2020.5536.1099.
  40. Sanz, M.,Ironero, J., & Abadia, J. (1992). iron chlorosis in the Ebro river basin, Spain. Journal Plant Nutrition 15: 1971-1981. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169209364451.
  41. Salihe, F. (2008). Understanding soil and nutrient of pistachio trees. Research in state of the country. Rafsanjani.pp. 101. (In Persian)
  42. Schultz, H., Dunst, G., & Glaser, B. (2013). Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33(4): 817-827.
  43. Sadegei, A., Babalar, M., & Talayei, A. (2020). Effect of iron and zinc foliar application on the performance of qualitative properties and concentration of leaf and fruit elements (Malus domestica cv. Gala). Iranian Journal of Horticulture 4: 965-977. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.228844.1204.
  44. Tabatabaei, S.J. (2013). Principle of plant mineral fertilizers (theoretical and practical concepts). First edition Tabriz university press. pp. 544. (In Persian)
  45. Thomine, S., & Vert, G. (2013). Iron transport in plants: better be safe than sorry. Current Opinion Plant Biology 16(3): 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.01.003.
  46. Wallas, A. (1991). Rational approach ti Iron defincincy, other plant breeding and the choice of resistant cultivars. International symposium on iron nutrition and interactions in plants 130: 281-28.
CAPTCHA Image