with the collaboration of Iranian Scientific Association for Landscape (ISAL)

Improving the Growth and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Cv. 240) under the Cover of Supplementary Light and Dissolved Phosphorus and Calcium

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract
Introduction
As an artificial light source, LED bulbs can help to grow better and faster greenhouse products. Meanwhile, blue and red light are important for plant growth. The quality of light in terms of color and wavelength can affect the morphological structure of the plants. Therefore, the use of additional lights in winter, when light exposure is less than normal, can improve plant growth and flowering. It is also advisable to change the quality of light by using artificial light sources in controlled environments such as greenhouses in order to change the quantity and quality of agricultural products, especially fruits.

Materials and Methods
In this research, the effect of complementary light and nutrition (commercial Calfomyth solution containing high calcium phosphorus and calcium elements along with micronutrient elements) as a pot experiment under non-soil culture conditions in the greenhouse, in the form of split-based plots experiment A completely randomized design with 3 light treatments including: natural light (control), 60% red light + 40% light blue and 90% red light + 10% blue light, and 2 nutritional treatments including: non-spraying with commercial fertilizer, Calfomyth and spraying A concentration of 2,000 in 3 replicates was established and implemented. The traits that were studied in this experiment are: 1- leaf number (count of leaves), 2- plant height by meter, with accuracy 0.01 m, 3- diameter with caliber with accuracy 0.01 mm, 4- Number of flowers (counting), 5- Time of flowering until the product reaches (counting the number of days), 6- Performance: Whole and red ripe fruits were planted and weighed separately from the total fruit weight Per plant was obtained in grams per plant. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP8 software and comparison of means was done using LSD test at 1% and 5% probability levels.

Results and Discussion
The results showed that the application of additional light on fruit yield, stem diameter and plant height, yield time and leaf number (p≤0.05) were significant. Spraying with Calfomyth could have a significant effect on stem diameter and number of leaves. In the traits such as fruit yield, number of flowers and leaves, the interaction effect of feeding and supplementary light was also significant. The highest elevation was observed for 60% red + 40% blue (25.38 m) and the lowest for light control treatment (20.72 m). Also, the shortest arrival time was 90% red + 10% water treatment in 29 days and the maximum time to reach the product was 45 days. The highest number of leaves belonged to 60% red + 40% blue treatment, as well as spraying with Calfomyth (118), the highest number of flowers (50) was related to 90% red + 10% blue and Calfomyth treatment, and the smallest number ( 15) was related to control treatment. Also, the highest yield (3553 g of fruit per plant) was obtained in Calfomyth treatment with 90% red + 10% blue treatment and the lowest yield (434 g fruit per plant) The control was light and non-foliar treatment. Although light is an important source of photosynthesis, photosynthesis can also be related to a series of optical regulators and optical sensors. Blue and red light cause different optical sensors and expression of genes, each of which can have a positive or negative effect on plant growth and development. Therefore, it can be concluded that the presence of both wavelengths (blue and red) is necessary for conducting, and for this reason, more research is now focused on achieving an appropriate optical composition.

Conclusion
In this research, all of the morphological traits examined in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plant were subjected to additional exposure by LED bulbs, each of which had a special effect on their receptors in the plant. Maximize growth and yield in the plant. As expected, blue light on vegetative traits and red light were more effective on reproductive traits. It can be said that the existence of both wavelengths (blue and red) is essential for the better and complete growth of the plant. In addition to the positive effect of wavelengths, the positive effect of leaf spraying can also be observed, which, along with the neodymium, could improve growth. The results of this study showed that the performance and growth under the cover of LED light (red and blue combination) were superior to natural conditions. Therefore, it could be suggested that the use of these lamps, as well as spraying with Calfomyth commercial fertilizer, could be feasible for better production in controlled conditions (greenhouse). It seems that application of complementary lights with proper nutrition can improve the performance and growth of tomato plants in greenhouse conditions.

Keywords

Subjects

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

 

1.       Brown, C. S., Schuerger, A. C., & Sager, J. C. (1995). Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120(5), 808-813. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.120.5.808
2.       Cooke, G. W. (1982). Fertilizing for maximum yield (3rd ed.). London, England: Granada Publishing Limited.P 465.
3.       Deram, P., Lefsrud, M. G., & Orsat, V. (2014). Supplemental lighting orientation and red-to-blue ratio of light-emitting diodes for greenhouse tomato production. HortScience, 49(4), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.4.448
4.       Dong, C. X., Zhou, J. M., Fan, X. H., Wang, H. Y., Duan, Z. Q., & Tang, C. (2005). Application methods of calcium supplements affect nutrient levels and calcium forms in mature tomato fruits. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 27(8), 1443-1455. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200025861
5.       Dorais, M., Gosselin, A., & Trudel, M. J. (1991). Annual greenhouse tomato production under a sequential intercropping system using supplemental light. Scientia Horticulturae, 45(3-4), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(91)90067-9
6.       Dougher, T. A., & Bugbee, B. (2001). Differences in the Response of Wheat, Soybean and Lettuce to Reduced Blue Radiation. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 73(2), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2001)0730199DITROW2.0.CO2
7.       Dougher, T. A., & Bugbee, B. G. (1998). Is blue light good or bad for plants? Life Support & Biosphere Science, 5(2), 129-136.
8.       Gaudreau, L. (1994). Photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux influence growth and quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. HortScience, 29(11), 1285-1289. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.11.1285
9.       Giacomelli, G. (1987). Lettuce and tomato intercropping system with supplemental lighting. Soilless Culture, 3(1), 39-50.
10.    Giovanelli, G. (1999). Variation in antioxidant components of tomato during vine and post harvest ripening. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79(12), 1583-1588. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199909)79:12<1583::AID-JSFA405>3.0.CO;2-J
11.    Goto, E. (2003). Effects of light quality on growth of crop plants under artificial lighting. Environment Control in Biology, 41(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb1963.41.121
12.    Gunes, A., & Alpaslan, M. (2000). Boron uptake and toxicity in maize genotypes in relation to boron and phosphorus supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 23(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382038
13.    Gеowacka, B. (2004). The effect of blue light on the height and habit of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant. Folia Horticulturae, 16(2), 3-10.
14.    Baneh, H. D., & Taheri, M. A. H. D. I. (2009). Effects of foliar application of nutrient elements on fruit set and quantitative and qualitative traits of Keshmeshi grape cultivar. Seed and Plant Production Journal25(1), 103-115.
15.    Hertogh, A. A. (1989). Holland Bulb Forcers Guide. Hillegom, The Netherlands: International Flower Bulb Center.
16.    Hochmuth, G. J., & Hochmuth, R. C. (1990). Nutrient solution formulation for hydroponic (perlite, rockwool, NFT) tomatoes in Florida. Gainesville, FL, USA: Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. SSVEC-44.
17.    Hogewoning, S. W., Trouwborst, G., Maljaars, H., Poorter, H., van Ieperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2010). Blue light dose responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(11), 3107-3117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq132
18.    Atherton, J. G., & Rudich, J. (Eds.). (1986). The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. 661 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3137-4
19.    Kara, A., Kotov, A., & Bukhov, N. (1997). Specific distribution of gibberellins, cytokinins, indole-3-acetic acid, and abscisic acid in radish plants closely correlates with photomorphogenetic responses to blue or red light. Journal of Plant Physiology, 151(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80035-1
20.    Kim, H. H., Goins, G. D., Wheeler, R. M., & Sager, J. C. (2004). Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red-and blue-light-emitting diodes. HortScience, 39(7), 1617-1622. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.7.1617
21.    Lefsrud, M. G., Kopsell, D. A., & Sams, C. E. (2008). Irradiance from distinct wavelength light-emitting diodes affect secondary metabolites in kale. HortScience, 43(7), 2243-2244. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.7.2243
22.    Li, C., Tao, J., Zhao, D., You, C., & Ge, J. (2012). Effect of calcium sprays on mechanical cell wall fractions of Herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) inflorescence stems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13, 4704-4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044704
23.    Li, H., Tang, C., & Xu, Z. (2013). The effects of different light qualities on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) plantlet growth and morphogenesis in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 150, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.009
24.    Marschner, P., Solaiman, Z., & Rengel, Z. (2007). Brassica genotypes differ in growth, phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties under P-limiting conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.014
25.    Maas, J. L. (Ed.). (1984). Compendium of Strawberry Diseases. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society in cooperation with Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 138 p.
26.    Massa, G. D. Kim, H. H., Wheeler, R. M., & Mitchell, C. A. (2008). Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience, 43(7), 1951-1956. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.7.1951
27.    Matar, A., Torrent, J., & Ryan, J. (1992). Soil and fertilizer phosphorus and crop responses in the dryland Mediterranean zone. Advances in Soil Science, 81-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2844-8_3
28.    Matsuda, R., Ohashi-Kaneko, K., Fujiwara, K., Goto, E., & Kurata, K. (2004). Photosynthetic characteristics of rice leaves grown under red light with or without supplemental blue light. Plant and Cell Physiology, 45(12), 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pch203
29.    Matsuda, R., Ohashi-Kaneko, K., Fujiwara, K., & Kurata, K. (2008). Effects of blue light deficiency on acclimation of light energy partitioning in PSII and CO2 assimilation capacity to high irradiance in spinach leaves. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(4), 664-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn041
30.    Miller, W. B., & Langhans, R. W. (1989). Reduced irradiance affects dry weight partitioning in Easter lily. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science114(2), 306-309. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.114.2.306
31.    Mullins, G. L. (2009). Phosphorus, Agriculture and the Environment. Blacksburg, VA, USA: Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
32.    Ménard, C., Dorais, M., Hovi, T., & Gosselin, A. (2006). Developmental and physiological responses of tomato and cucumber to additional blue light. In V International Symposium on Artificial Lighting in Horticulture; Lillehammer, Norway. Acta Horticulturae, 711, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.711.39
33.    Bukhov, N. G., Drozdova, I. S., & Bondar, V. V.  (1995). Light response curves of photosynthesis in leaves of sun-type and 9-shade-type plants grown in blue or red light. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 30(1), 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(95)07124-K
34.    O’Carrigan, A., Hinde, E., Lu, N., Xu, X. Q., Duan, H., Huang, G., & Chen, Z. H. (2014). Effects of light irradiance on stomatal regulation and growth of tomato. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 98(65-73). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.007
35.    Okamoto, K., Yanagi, T., Takita, S., Tanaka, M., Higuchi, T., Ushida, Y., & Watanabe, H. (1996). Development of plant growth apparatus using blue and red LED as artificial light source. In: International Symposium on Plant Production in Closed Ecosystems. (1996). Narita, Japan. Acta Horticulturae, 440, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.440.20
36.    Papadopoulos, A. P. (2003). Effects of calcium and magnesium on growth, fruit yield and quality in a fall greenhouse tomato crop grown on rockwool. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83(4), 903-912. https://doi.org/10.4141/P02-140
37.    Radin, J. W. (1984). Stomatal responses to water stress and to abscisic acid in phosphorus-deficient cotton plants. Plant Physiology, 76(2), 392-394. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.76.2.392
38.    Robichaux, M. B. (2008). The effect of calcium or silicon on potted miniature roses or poinsettias (M.S. thesis). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
39.    Royers, D. L., Berner, R. A. M., Tabor, I. P., Beerling, N. J., & Beerling, D. J.  (2004). CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today, 14(3), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<4:CAAPDO>2.0.CO;2
40.    Schuerger, A. C., Brown, C. S., & Stryjewski, E. C. (1997). Anatomical features of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under red light-emitting diodes supplemented with blue or far-red light. Annals of Botany, 79(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0341
41.    Singh, V., Pallaghy, C. K., & Singh, D. (2006). Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: II. Water relations, free and bound water and leaf expansion rate. Field Crops Research, 96(2), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.011
42.    Taragola, N., & Van Lierde, D. (2000). Competitive strategies in the sector of greenhouse tomato production in Belgium. In XXV International Horticultural Congress, Part 14: Horticultural Economics at Micro and Macro Level, International Trade and Marketing; Brussels, Belgium. Acta Horticulturae, 524, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.524.17
43.    Turnbull, T. L., Warren, C. R., & Adams, M. A. (2007). Novel mannose sequestration technique reveals variation in subcellular orthophosphate pools do not explain the effects of phosphorus nutrition on photosynthesis in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. New Phytologist, 176(4), 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02229.x
44.    Urbonavičiūtė, A., Pinho, P., Samuolienė, G., Duchovskis, P., Vitta, P., Stonkus, A., & Halonen, L. (2007). Effect of short-wavelength light on lettuce growth and nutritional quality. Sodininkystė ir Daržininkystė, 26, 157-165.
45.    Wissuwa, M., Gamat, G., & Ismail, A. M. (2005). Is root growth under phosphorus deficiency affected by source or sink limitations? Journal of Experimental Botany, 56(417), 1943-1950. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri189
46.    XiaoYing, L. ShiRong, G., ZhiGang, X., XueLei, J., & Tezuka, T. (2011). Regulation of chloroplast ultrastructure, cross-section anatomy of leaves, and morphology of stomata of cherry tomato by different light irradiations of light-emitting diodes. HortScience, 46(2), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.2.217
47.    Xiaoying, L. Shirong, G., Taotao, C., Zhigang, X., & Tezuka, T. (2012). Regulation of the growth and photosynthesis of cherry tomato seedlings by different light irradiations of light emitting diodes (LED(. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(22), 6169-6177.
48.    Xu, Y., Chang, Y., Chen, G., & Lin, H. (2016). The research on LED supplementary lighting system for plants. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 127(18), 7193-7201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.056
49.    Yorio, N. C., Wheeler, R. M., Goins, G. D., Sanwo-Lewandowski, M. M., Mackowiak, C. L., Brown, C. S., Sager, J. C., Stutte, G.W.; & Sager, J. C. (1998). Blue light requirements for crop plants used in bioregenerative life support systems. Life Support & Biosphere Science, 5(2), 119-128.
50.    Yorio, N. C. Goins, G. D., Kagie, H. R., Wheeler, R. M., Sager, J. C., Goins, G. D., Wheeler, R. M., & Sager, J. C. (2001). Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience, 36(2), 380-383. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.2.380
51.    Zhang, S. Jiang, H., Zhao, H., Korpelainen, H., & Li, C. (2014). Sexually different physiological responses of Populus cathayana to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies. Tree Physiology, 34(4), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu025
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
Volume 40, Issue 2
Summer 2026
Pages 262-251

  • Receive Date 06 January 2021
  • Revise Date 15 April 2021
  • Accept Date 05 February 2022
  • First Publish Date 05 February 2022