اثر نورهای مختلف LED قرمز و آبی بر خصوصیات ریخت‌شناختی و فیزیولوژیکی گیاه زوفا (Hyssopus officinalis L.)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

فاطمه اسماعیلی ¹

حسن بیات ¹

حسین نستری نصرآبادی ²

محمد حسین امینی فرد ¹

¹ گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

² گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی، مجتمع آموزش عالی تربت جام، تربت جام، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2025.90559.1387

چکیده

نور، منبع اصلی انرژی برای فرآیند فتوسنتز و عامل مهمی برای رشد ‌و‌ نمو گیاه محسوب می‌شود. امروزه با استفاده از لامپ‌های LED، شرایط برای مطالعه طیف‌های مختلف نور و بهبود رشد و تولید انبوه گیاهان در محیط‌های کنترل‌شده فراهم می‌شود. مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی خصوصیات ریخت‌شناختی و فیزیولوژیکی گیاه زوفا (Hyssopus officinalis L.) در واکنش به تیمارهای مختلف نوری LED شامل سفید، قرمز:آبی (70:30)، قرمز:آبی (30:70)، قرمز:آبی (50:50)، آبی100 درصد و قرمز 100 درصد با شدت نوری 10 ±250 میکرومول فوتون بر مترمربع در ثانیه ساطع‌شده از لامپ­های LED در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال 1402 در آزمایشگاه مجتمع آموزش عالی تربت­جام انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که طیف‌های مختلف نوری تأثیر معنی‌داری بر ویژگی‌های رشدی و فیزیولوژیکی گیاه زوفا داشتند. در نور قرمز، بیشترین میزان وزن تر و خشک شاخساره، ریشه و کل گیاه ثبت شد، بیشترین میزان کلروفیل a، b، کلروفیل کل و اسانس در گیاهان رشد‌یافته در محیط‌ نوری ترکیب قرمز:آبی (30:70) به دست آمد. کمترین میزان آنتی­اکسیدان در تیمار شاهد مشاهده شد. تیمار ترکیبی نور قرمز:آبی (70:30) باعث افزایش 30 درصد کاروتنوئید نسبت به شاهد گردید. بیشترین و کمترین میزان فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی به‌ترتیب در تیمارهای نوری قرمز:آبی (50:50) و شاهد ثبت گردید. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که استفاده از روش‌های نوین کشاورزی با سیستم‌های نوردهی مصنوعی سبب بهبود شاخص‌های رشدی و فیزیولوژیکی گیاه زوفا شده و کاربرد نور قرمز 100 درصد و ترکیب قرمز:آبی (70:30) به‌دلیل افزایش کارآیی تولید و حصول حداکثر عملکرد گیاه، از نظر اقتصادی و اجرایی قابل توصیه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

رشد

سطح برگ

کلروفیل کل

کیفیت نور

موضوعات

• گیاهان دارویی

---

عنوان مقاله English

Effect of Red and Blue LED Lights on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.)

نویسندگان English

F. Esmaeili ¹

H. Bayat ¹

H. Nastari Nasrabadi ²

M.H. Aminifard ¹

¹ Department of Horticulture Science and Engineering, College of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

² Department of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Respectively, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, University of Torbat-e Jam, Torbat- e Jam, Khorasan Razavi, Iran.

چکیده English

Light plays a fundamental role in plant growth and development, significantly influencing photosynthesis and overall plant yield. Various light characteristics, including intensity, quality, and duration, have critical effects on plant biological processes. The light spectrum can significantly impact plant metabolism throughout the growth period. The use of LED light not only provides the necessary wavelengths but also reduces energy loss and allows precise control over the photosynthetic photon flux. LED lighting can be utilized to optimize plant growth and yield in greenhouse and growth chamber environments. Blue and red light are the primary wavelengths involved in carbon dioxide fixation and photosynthesis, exerting a significant influence on plant growth (Cosgrove, 1981; Kasajima et al., 2008.( Hyssopus officinalis, a perennial plant belonging to the Lamiaceae family, is well known for its antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. This study evaluates LED light as an alternative to natural sunlight in controlled environments. Previous research has shown that changes in light quality can significantly affect growth parameters such as plant height, stem length, leaf length and width, leaf area, and fresh and dry biomass. Optimizing light conditions can enhance plant production in closed environments, offering economic and scientific potential for the cultivation of medicinal plants. The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of different LED light spectra on the growth, physiological, and morphological characteristics of Hyssopus officinalis.
 
Materials and Methods
To investigate the growth and physiological characteristics of Hyssopus officinalis, an experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design with three replications and six LED light treatments. The seeds were sourced from Glass Garden Company. The growing medium consisted of a mixture of 40% cocopeat, 40% perlite, and 20% vermiculite to provide optimal conditions for plant growth.  In the growth chamber, the light treatments included white (control), 100% red, 100% blue, red:blue (70:30), red:blue (30:70), and red:blue (50:50). White light served as the control treatment. The LED lamps used in this experiment were 24-watt wall washers with different light spectra, covering wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm. The light intensity was set at 250 ± 10 μmol photons.m⁻².s⁻¹. The photoperiod was maintained at 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness, with day and night temperatures of 25°C and 20°C, respectively. Following germination, the plants were irrigated daily with a half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution. Once the plants reached the four-leaf stage, they were supplied with a full-strength Hoagland solution every other day (20 g in 10 liters of distilled water) at a rate of 100 cc per pot .After five months, morphological and physiological parameters were evaluated. Measurements included stem, root, and leaf length; leaf width; leaf area; root volume; internode length; number of lateral branches; fresh and dry weight of roots, stems, and leaves; total plant fresh and dry weight; and chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and essential oil yield. Data analysis was performed using SAS statistical software, and mean comparisons were conducted using the LSD test at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that different light spectra had a significant effect on the growth and physiological characteristics of the hyssop plant at the 5% and 1% probability levels. The highest fresh and dry weight of shoot, root, and total plant was recorded under red light. The highest amounts of chlorophyll a (1.11 mg.g^-1 fresh weight) and chlorophyll b (1.89 mg.g^-1 fresh weight) were observed in plants grown under red: blue (70:30) and red: blue (30:70) light combinations, respectively. The highest (1.10 mg.g^-1 fresh weight) and lowest (1.01 mg.g^-1 fresh weight) of carotenoid content were found under the red: blue (70:30) and the red: blue (30:70) light combinations, respectively. The maximum essential oil (1.71%) recorded under red: blue (30:70) combination. The highest and the lowest antioxidant activity levels were recorded in the red: blue (50:50) and control light treatments, respectively.
 
Conclusion
The results showed that different light spectra significantly influenced the morphological and physiological characteristics of Hyssopus officinalis. Red light increased morphological and growth characteristics properties. These findings suggested that optimizing light spectra can significantly affected the growth and development of Hyssopus officinalis, and further studies could explore these mechanisms. The results of this study showed that use of modern agricultural methods with artificial lighting systems improved the growth and physiological indices of Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). The application of 100% red light and 30:70 red-blue light combinations is recommended.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Growth

Leaf area

Light quality

Total chlorophyll

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

مراجع

1. Arena, C., Tsonev, T., Doneva, D., De Micco, V., Michelozzi, M., Brunetti, C., Calfapietra, C., & Loreto, F. (2016). The effect of light quality on growth, photosynthesis, leaf anatomy and volatile isoprenoids of a monoterpene-emitting herbaceous species (Solanum lycopersicum) and an isoprene-emitting tree (Platanus orientalis L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 130, 122-132.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.05.014
2. Batschauer,, Banerjee, P., & Pokorny, R. (2007). Cryptochromes. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
3. Bantis, F., Ouzounis, T., & Radoglou, K. (2016). Artificial LED lighting enhances growth characteristics and total phenolic content of Ocimum basilicum, but variably affects transplant success. Scientia Horticulturae, 198, 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.014
4. British Pharmacopoeia. (1988). (Vol. 2). London: H.M.S.O, p. 137-138.
5. Chen, M., Chory, J., & Fankhauser, C. (2004). Light signal transduction in higher plants. Annual Review of Genetics, 38, 87-117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092259
6. Chen, S., Shen, X., Cheng, S., Li, P., Du, J., Chang, Y., & Meng, H. (2013). Evaluation of garlic cultivars for polyphenolic content and antioxidant properties. Plos One, 8(11), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079730
7. Cosgrove, D.J. (1981). Rapid suppression of growth by blue light: Occurrence, time course, and general characteristics. Plant Physiology, 67, 584-590. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.67.3.584
8. Clark, L.J., Whalley, W.R., & Barraclough, P.B.(1999). How do roots penetrate strong soli. Plant and Soli, 217(1-2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026140122848
9. Davis, P.A., & Burns, C. (2016). Photobiology in protected horticulture. Journal of Food and Energy Security, 5, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.97
10. Evans, J.R. (1988). Acclimation by the thylakoid membranes to growth irradiance and the partitioning of nitrogen between soluble and thylakoid proteins. Functional Plant Biology, 15(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880093
11. Fathiazad, F., Mazandarani, M., & Hamedeyazdan, S. (2011). Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of Hyssopus officinalis from Iran. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 1(2), 63.‏ https://doi.org/10.5681/apb.2011.009
12. Gindaba, , Rozanov, A., & Negash, L. (2004). Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 201, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.009
13. Hernandez, , & Kubota, C. (2015). Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 121(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.04.001
14. Heo, J.W., Lee, C.W., & Paek, K.Y. (2006). Influence of mixed LED radiation on the growth of annual plants. Journal of Plant Biology, 49, 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031157
15. Hosseini, A., Mehrjerdi, M.Z., Aliniaeifard, S., & Seif, M. (2019). Photosynthetic and growth responses of green and purple basil plants under different spectral compositions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 25, 741-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00647-7
16. Hogewoning, W., Trouwborst, G., Maljaars, H., Poorter, H., van Leperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2010). Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(11), 3107-3117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq132
17. Johkan, M., Shoji, K., Goto, F., Hashida, S.N., & Yoshihara, T. (2010). Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seed quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. Horticultural Science, 45, 1809-1814. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.12.1809
18. Kalaji, H.M., Carpentier, R., Allakhverdiev, S.I., & Bosa, K. (2012). Fluorescence parameters as early indicators of light stress in barley. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 112, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.03.009
19. Kalaji, H.M., Jajoo, A., Oukarroum, A., Brestic, M., Zivcak, M., Samborska, I.A., Cetner, M.D., Łukasik, I., Goltsev, V., & Ladle, R.J. (2016). Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 38, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2113-y
20. Kasajima, S.Y., Inoue, N., Mahmud, R., & Kato, M. (2008). Developmental responses of wheat cv. Norin 61 to fluence rate of green light. Plant Production Science, 11, 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.11.76
21. Kapoor, S., Raghuvanshi, R., Bhardwaj, P., Sood, H., Saxena, S., & Chaurasia, O.P. (2018). Influence of light quality on growth, secondary metabolites production and antioxidant activity in callus culture of Rhodiola imbricata Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 183, 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.04.018
22. Kim, H.J., Lin, M.Y., & Mitchell, C.A. (2019). Light spectral and thermal properties govern biomass allocation in tomato through morphological and physiological changes. Journal of Environmental and Experimental Botany, 157, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.10.019
23. Kim, S.J., Hahn, E.J., Heo, J.W., & Paek, K.Y. (2004). Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth, and leaf stomata of Chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 101(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.003
24. Kinoshita, T., Doi, M., Suetsugu, N., Kagawa, T., Wada, M., & Shimazaki, K.I. (2001). Phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. Nature, 414, 656. https://doi.org/10.1038/414656a
25. Kozai, T., Niu, G., & Takagaki, M. (2016). Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production. Amsterdam / Boston: Academic Press. xxvi + 405.
26. Li, Y., Xin, G., Wei, M., Shi, Q., Yang, F., & Wang, X. (2017). Carbohydrate accumulation and sucrose metabolism responses in tomato seedling leaves when subjected to different light qualities. Scientia Horticulturae, 225, 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.053
27. Lichtenthaler, H.K., & Rinderle, U. (1988). The role of chlorophyll fluorescence in the detection of stress conditions in plants. CRC Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 19, 29-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476510.1988.10401466
28. Lu, N., Maruo, T., Johkan, M., Hohjo, M., Tsukagoshi, S., Ito, Y., & Shinohara, Y. (2012). Effects of supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on tomato yield and quality of single-truss tomato plants grown at high planting density. Environmental Control in Biology, 50(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.50.63
29. Manivannan, A., Soundararajan, P., Halimah, N., Ko, C.H., & Jeong, B.R. (2015). Blue LED light enhances growth, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities of Rehmannia glutinosa cultured in vitro. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 56(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0114-1
30. Mitchell, C., Both, A.J., Bourget, M., Burr, J., Kubota, C., Lopez, R., Morrow, R., & Runkle, E. (2012).
31. LEDs: The future of greenhouse lighting. Chronica Horticulturae, 52, 1–9.
32. Muneer, S., Kim, E.J., Park, J.S., & Lee, J.H. (2014). Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa ). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15, 4657-4670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034657
33. Nanya, K., Ishigami, Y., Hikosaka, S., & Goto, E. (2012). Effects of blue and red light on stem elongation and flowering of tomato seedlings. Acta Horticulturae, 956, 261-266. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.956.29
34. Nishimura, T., Zobayed, S.M.A., Kozai, T., & Goto, E. (2007). Medicinally important secondary metabolites and growth of Hypericum perforatum plants as affected by light quality and intensity. Environmental Control in Biology, 45(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.45.113
35. Park,Y., Lee, J.G., Cho, H.S., Seong, E.S., Kim, H.Y., Yu, C.Y., & Kim, J.K. (2013). Metabolite profiling approach for assessing the effects of colored light-emitting diode lighting on the adventitious roots of ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Mayer). Plant Omics Journal, 6, 224-230.
36. Rabara, R.C., Behrman, G., Timbol, T., & Rushton, P.J. (2017). Effect of spectral quality of monochromatic LED lights on the growth of Artichoke seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00190
37. Raju, S., Shah, S., & Gajbhiye, N. (2013). Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis and accumulation of sennosides in plant parts of senna (Cassia angustifolia ). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 3, 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-013-0038-7
38. Ramakrishna, A., Dayananda, C., Giridhar, P., Rajasekaran, T., & Ravishankar, G.A. (2011). Photoperiod influences endogenous indoleamines in cultured green alga Dunaliella bardawil. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 49, 234-240.
39. Ren, J., Guo, S., Xu, C., Yang, C., Ai, W., Tang, Y., & Qin, L. (2014). Effects of different carbon dioxide and LED lighting levels on the anti-oxidative capabilities of Gynura bicolor Advances in Space Research, 53(2), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.019
40. Ryu, J.H., Seo, K.S., Choi, G.L., Rha, E.S., Lee, S.C., Choi, S.K., Kong, S.Y., & Bae, C.H. (2012). Effects of LED light illumination on germination, growth and anthocyanin content of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). The Korean Journal of Plant Resources, 25(6), 731-738. https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.6.731
41. Sabzalian, M.R., Heydarizadeh, P., Zahedi, M., Boroomand, A., Agharokh, M., Sahba, M.R., & Schoefs, B. (2014). High performance of vegetables, flowers, and medicinal plants in a red-blue LED incubator for indoor plant production. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 879-886 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0209-6
42. Savvides, A., Fanourakis, D., & Van Ieperen, W. (2012). Co-ordination of hydraulic and stomatal conductances across light qualities in cucumber leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 1135-1143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err348
43. Schuerger, A.C., Brown, C.S., & Stryjewski, E.C. (1997). Anatomical features of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum) grown under red light-emitting diodes supplemented with blue or far-red light. Annals of Botany, 79, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0341
44. Son,H., & Oh, M.M. (2013). Leaf shape, growth, and antioxidant phenolic compounds of two lettuce cultivars grown under various combinations of blue and red light-emitting diodes. Horticultural Science, 48, 988-995. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.8.988
45. Stutte, G.W., Endey, S., & Skerritt, T. (2009). Photoregulation of bioprotectant content of red leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes. Journal of HortiScience, 44, 79-82. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.79
46. Suetsugu, N., Takami, T., Ebisu, Y., Watanabe, H., Iiboshi, C., Doi, M., & Shimazaki, K. (2014). Guard cell chloroplasts are essential for blue light-dependent stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Plos One, 9, e108374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108374
47. Urbonaviciute, A., Samuoliene, G., Brazaityte, A., Ulinskaite, R., Jankauskiene, J., Duchovskis, P., & Zukauskas, A. (2008). The possibility to control the metabolism of green vegetables and sprouts using light emitting diode illumination. Sodininkyste ir Darzininkyste, 27, 83-92.
48. Verma, K., Gantait, S., Jeong, B.R., & Hwang, S.J. (2018). Enhanced growth and cardenolides production in Digitalis purpurea under the influence of different LED exposures in the plant factory. Scientific Reports, 8, 18009. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36113-9
49. Vinterhalter,, Grubišić, D., Vinterhalter, B., & Konjević, R. (1990). Light-controlled root elongation in in vitro cultures of Dracaena fragrans Ker-Gawl. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 22, 1-6.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043691
50. Wang, H., Gu, M., Cui, J., Shi, K., Zhou, Y., & Yu, J. (2009). Effects of light quality on CO₂ assimilation, chlorophyll-fluorescence quenching, expression of Calvin cycle genes and carbohydrate accumulation in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 96, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.03.010
51. Wang, J., Lu, W., Tong, Y., & Yang, Q. (2016). Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00250.
52. Wu, M., Hou, C.Y., Jiang, C.M., Wang, Y.T., Wang, C.Y., Chen, H.H., & Chang, H.M. (2007). A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings. Food Chemistry, 101, 1753-1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.02.010