اثر تنش شوری بر خصوصیات ریشه گوجه‌فرنگی (’Saint Pierre‘) و عملکرد آن تحت مدیریت زمان آبیاری

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مغان، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

3 گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، مرکز آموزش عالی کاشمر

چکیده

از مهم­ترین مشکلات در اراضی تحت کشت ایران می­توان به وضعیت نامناسب کیفی و کمی منابع آب در سطح کشور اشاره کرد. در این تحقیق، اثر مقادیر مختلف شوری آب آبیاری بر عملکرد و خصوصیات ریشه گوجه­فرنگی با مدیریت­های مختلف زمان آبیاری در شهرستان اردبیل مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل شوری آب آبیاری (در چهار سطح 5/1، 5/2، 4 و 7 دسی­زیمنس بر متر) و زمان اعمال آبیاری (آبیاری در سه زمان، به­ترتیب 40، 50 و 65 درصد تخلیه مجاز رطوبتی) در چهار تکرار اجرا شدند. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد شوری آب آبیاری دارای اثر معنی­دار (p <0.01) بر وزن، قطر و حجم ریشه، میزان تبخیر و تعرق، زه­آب خروجی و عملکرد گوجه­فرنگی می­باشد. همچنین تیمارهای شوری آب­آبیاری 5/2 و 7 دسی‌زیمنس بر متر دارای بیشنه و کمینه عملکرد گوجه­فرنگی به­ترتیب برابر 9/114 و 58/37 گرم بودند. از طرفی، افزایش شوری آب­آبیاری از 5/1 به 5/2 دسی­زیمنس بر متر و افزایش تخلیه مجاز رطوبتی از 40 به 50 درصد تفاوت معنی­داری بر عملکرد گوجه فرنگی نداشت. به­طور کلی نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد استفاده از آب­های دارای شوری قابل قبول، می­تواند یکی از راهکارهای جبران و کاهش مشکلات منابع آب موجود باشد، که البته این امر باید با رعایت مدیریت شوری و آبشویی خاک همراه باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Salinity Stress on Tomato Root Characteristics) Saint Pierre) and its Yield under Irrigation Time Management

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. Abdoli 1
  • J. Ramezani moghadam 1
  • Y. Hosseini 2
  • M.R. Nikpour 1
  • H. Dehghan 3
1 Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran
2 Water Engineering Department, Agriculture and Natural Resources Faculty of Moghan, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran
3 Water Science and Engineering Department, Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Nowadays, the decrease of water resources and increasing salinity of irrigation water are evident in most parts of Iran. Increased salinity of irrigation water can impair plant metabolism, decrease biomass and stem length. On the other hand, water stress decreases root length and weight and crop yield. One way to reduce the negative effects of moisture stress is management of irrigation time. This can be investigated by changing the percentage of moisture permitted depletion and selecting the one with the lowest yield depletion. On the other hand, the amount of damage to the crop can be reduced by examining different amounts of water salinity and its effect on crop yield. Therefore, in this study, the effects of different amounts of irrigation water salinity and irrigation time management on tomato yield under greenhouse conditions were investigated.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in greenhouse (No. 2) of Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. In this research, the effect of different values of salinity (in different irrigation times) on root characteristics and yield of tomato (Saint Pierre cultivar) was investigated. The experimental design used in this research was a factorial experiment in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The applied treatments included salinity of irrigation water (four levels: S1=1.5ds/m, S2=2.5ds/m, S3=4ds/m and S4=7ds/m) and irrigation time management stress (in three levels, irrigation at 40, 50 and 65% field capacity, respectively, I1, I2, I3). The pots used in this study were incomplete cones with a height of 27 cm, a span diameter of 26 cm and a bottom diameter of 19 cm. In this study, indirect method (transplanting) was used for cultivating tomato. After cultivating the transplants in prepared pots, they were irrigated with pure water for two months to stabilize the transplants in order to avoid any stress effect on the transplants. The moisture meter (Model: PMS-714) was also used to measure daily soil moisture of the pots. Statistical analysis was performed by MSTATC software. The important characteristics investigated in this study were root length, root weight (dry and wet), root diameter and volume, plant yield, water drainage, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency.
Results and Discussion:According to the results of this study, salinity values of irrigation water had a significant effect at 1% level on fresh and dry root weight, root diameter and volume, total evapotranspiration, total water use, total water drainage output, crop yield and the number of blooms. On the other hand, irrigation water salinity had no significant effect on the number of unripe fruits at 5% confidence level. For example, the highest fresh and dry weight of roots were 26.17 and 6.3 g for S2 treatment, respectively. However, the difference in root weight values for S2 and S1 treatments (Mean equal to 27.5%) was not significant. Also, with increasing salinity of irrigation water above 2.5 dS/m, root weight (dry and fresh) decreased significantly (at 1% level). The reason for the decrease in root weight at high level of salt concentrations can be due to the accumulation of salt (including potassium, sodium, etc.) in various organs of the plant including the root. On the other hand, the results showed that the effect of irrigation time management was significant only on root diameter and weight of ripe fruit at 5% and 1%, respectively. According to the results of this study, irrigation can be achieved with 50% moisture allowable depletion instead of 40% moisture permitted depletion without significant change in the weight of ripe tomato fruit. This can certainly cause saving of irrigation water that can be very effective in the current condition of Iran and lack of water resources. In this study, the relationship between evapotranspiration and crop yield and the relationship between these parameters, were investigated. Results showed that, tomato yield coefficient of response to moisture stress (Ky) varied from 0.4 to 1.20. Also the average response coefficient of tomato to water stress was 1.12. This value was close to the mean Ky provided by the FAO (Ky = 1.05). The slight increase in Ky value obtained from this study is probably due to the salinity stress applied to the tomato plant.
Conclusion: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of salinity stress on yield and root characteristics of tomato under irrigation time management and greenhouse conditions. The results showed that the effect of irrigation salinity was significant on yield, yield components and root characteristics (e.g., root weight, diameter and volume, yield, evapotranspiration and drainage output). On the other hand, moisture stress induced by irrigation time variation had no significant effect on yield, yield components and root characteristics of tomato except in two cases. This study indicated that the effect of salinity irrigation water is more effective than water stress on reduction yield. Also, according to the results of this study, the use of 2.5 dS/m irrigation water salinity instead of 1.5 dS/m in most cases had no significant effect on yield reduction but may also increase it. The results of this study show that under current conditions of Iran (increasing quantitative and qualitative shortage of water resources) it is possible to use lower quality waters such as treated wastewater and agricultural wastewater (with management of salinity and leaching) to achieve the acceptable yields for crops.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Maximum allowable depletion
  • Moisture stress
  • water quality
  • Water use efficiency
1- Abdoli A. 2017. Determinig the best water uptake functions of tomato plant under simultanous salinity and water stress conditions. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)
2- Alizadeh A. 2011. Soil, Water, Plant Relationship. University of Emam Reza, Mashhad. (In Persian)Rahman M.A., Smith J.G., Stringer P., and Ennos A.R. 2011. Effect of rooting Conditions on the growth and Cooling ability of pyrus Calleryana. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 10: 185- 192.
3- Ardalani H., Babazade H., and Ebrahimi H. 2017. Modeling response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under simultaneous water salinity and nitrogen deficiency stresses. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 31(1):87-104. (In Persian with English abstract)
4- Bahram Nejad R., and Saffari M. 2014. The effects of different seed priming agents on morphological characteristics, yield, yield components and water extract of fennal (Foeniculum vulgar Mill) in water stress condition. Journal Irrigation and Water Engineering 5(1): 14-29. (In Persian with English abstract)
5- Cantore V., Lechkar O., Karabulut E., Sellami M.H., Albrizio R., Boari F., Stellacci A.M., and Todorovic M. 2016. Combined effect of deficit irrigation and strobilurin application onyield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of “cherry” tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Agricultural Water Management 167: 53–61.
6- Daneshvar Vousoughi F., Dinpashoh Y., and Aalami M. 2011. Effect of drought on groundwater level in the past two decades (case study: Ardebil Plain). Water and Soil Science 21(4): 165-179. (In Persian with English abstract)  
7- Dehghan H., Alizadeh A., Esmaeili K., and Nemati S.H. 2015. Root growth, yield and yield components of tomato under drought stress. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 29(2):169-179. (In Persian with English abstract)
8- Doorenbos J., and Kassam A.H. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper no. 33.
9- Farhadi H., Azizi M., and Nemati S.H. 2017. Study of germination characteristics of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) population under Salinity and Drought Stress. Journal of Horticulture Science 31(1):49-60. (In Persian (
10- Ghaedi S., Afrasiab P., and Liaghat A.M. 2016. Comparison of conjunction methods of sorghum grown in saline and non-saline water and salt adjustment- physiological properties in the soil profile. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering 39(1):167-179. (In Persian with English abstract)
11- Ghahramani Pirsalami F., Rahnam A., Siahpoosh M.R., and Broomand Nasab S. 2016. Effect of sprinkler irrigation with saline water on some morph-physiological traits and grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 18(2): 135-146. (In Persian (
12- Hassanli M., Parsinejad M., and Ebrahimian H. 2016. Increasing irrigation water use efficiency under drip irrigation using saline water. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering 39(3): 187-194. (In Persian with English abstract)    
13- Heydarnejad S., and Ranjbar Fordoii A. 2014. Assessment of salinity stress on some growth characteristics and ion accumulation in Seidlitzia rosmarinus. Journal of Desert Ecosystem Engineering 4: 1-10. (In Persian (
14- Hosseini Y., Babazade H., and Khakpor Arablo B. 2015. Modeling evaluating water uptake reduction functions under salinity and water stress conditions in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 29(4): 509-523. (In Persian with English abstract)
15- Hosseini Y., Ramezani Moghadam J., Nikpour M.R., and Abdoli A. 2018. Evaluating water uptake functions under simultaneous salinity and water stress conditions in cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 32(2): 247-265. (In Persian with English abstract)
16- Jamali S., Sharifan H., and Sajadi F. 2018. Utilization of Caspian Sea water for irrigation of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum) under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 25 (1): 243-256. (In Persian with English abstract)
17- Kesari Sh., Mandal R., Bhunia G.S., Kumar K., and Das P. 2014. Spatial distribution of P. argentipes in association with agricultural surrounding environment in North Bihar, India. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 8(3): 358-364.
18- Kheirabi J., Tavakkoli A.R., Entesari M.R., and Salamat A.R. 1996. Deficit irrigation manual. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, Tehran. (In Persian)
19- Mohammadi M., Liaghat A.M., and Molavi H. 2010. Optimization of water use and determination of tomato sensitivity coefficients under combined salinity and drought stress in Karaj. Journal of Water and Soil 24(3):583-592. (In Persian with English abstract) 
20- Momenpour A., Imani A., and Bakhshi D. 2018. Effect of salinity stress on some biochemical characteristics four genotypes of almond (Prunus dulcis). Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 32(2): 201-216. (In Persian with English abstract)
21- Mosaffa H.R., and Sepaskhah A.R. 2019. Performance of irrigation regimes and water salinity on winter wheat as influenced by planting methods. Agricultural Water Management 216: 444–456.
22- Ors S., and Suarez D.L. 2017. Spinach biomass yield and physiological response to interactive salinity and water stress. Agricultural Water Management 190: 31–41.
23- Piri H., Ansari H., and Parsa M. 2018. The interaction effect of salinity, drought and harvesting dates on yield, quality and efficiency of forage sorghum in subsurface drip irrigation (case study: Sistan plain). Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 41(1): 99-114. (In Persian with English abstract)
24- Ramezani Moghaddam J., Hosseini Y., Nikpour M.M., and Abdoli A. Evaluation the effects of the irrigation water salinity and water stress on yield components of cherry tomato. Journal of Water and Soil 32(3): 489-500. (In Persian with English abstract)
25- Ranjbar GH.H., and Soltani Gerdfaramarzi V. 2017. Comparison of yield and leaf minerals concentration of sorghum and kochia under irrigation water salinity and different kochia planting density. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 31(1):29-42. (In Persian with English abstract)
26- Shahrokhnia M.A., Shah Amirian M., and Olyan Ghiasi A. 2018. Influence of irrigation water on quality and quantity of tomato yield under seedling cultivation. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 10(2):177-186. (In Persian with English abstract)