با همکاری انجمن علمی منظر ایران

ارزیابی هیبریدهای امیدبخش گوجه‌فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum L.) با تأکید بر صفات کیفیت میوه و ماندگاری

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم باغبانی، دانشکده فناوری کشاورزی (ابوریحان)، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران

2 گروه علوم زراعی و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده فناوری کشاورزی (ابوریحان)، دانشگاه تهران، پاکدشت، ایران

چکیده
گوجه‌فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum L.)، مهم‌ترین محصول بعد از سیب‌زمینی در بین سبزیجات است. متأسفانه در ایران بخش زیادی از بذر مصرف‌شده برای این محصول وارداتی است. این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی و مقایسه 26 هیبرید منتخب از بین 180 هیبرید اولیه انجام گردید تا بهترین آن‌ها از نظر عملکرد و کیفیت میوه معرفی شود. نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت معنی‌داری بین ژنوتیپ‌ها از نظر صفات پایداری کاسبرگ، تعداد میوه در بوته، شاخص زودرسی، وزن تک میوه، ماندگاری، سفتی بافت میوه و اسیدیته قابل تیتراسیون در سطح احتمال 01/0 و صفات اسیدیته و مواد جامد محلول در سطح احتمال 5 درصد وجود داشت. تجزیه به مؤلفه‌های اصلی نشان داد که دو مؤلفه اول 60 درصد تغییرات را توجیه کردند. در گروه‌بندی ژنوتیپ‌ها با این روش، هیبریدهای ‘H114’، ‘gH168’، ‘gH181’، ‘gH55’ و ‘gH57’ با هیبریدهای تجاری و پرطرفدار ’Bedero‘ و ’Brivio‘ در یک گروه قرار گرفتند. در نمودار تجزیه به مؤلفه‌های اصلی صفات کیفی، دو مؤلفه اول 1/52 درصد تغییرات را توجیه کردند. بر همین اساس، هیبریدهای ‘gH57’، ‘H163’ و ‘H107’ با ارقام تجاری ’Bedero‘ و Brivio’‘ در یک گروه قرار گرفتند. با توجه به صفت تعداد میوه در بوته، هیبرید ‘H114’ با 84 و هیبرید ‘H163’ با تعداد 76 میوه برترین بودند. هیبریدهای ‘gH74’، ‘H107’ و ‘H163’ بیشترین اسیدیته قابل تیتراسیون را داشتند. از نظر ماندگاری میوه، هیبرید ‘gH168’ بهترین نتیجه (13 روز) را داشت. در مورد صفت شکل میوه، هیبریدهای ‘gH57’، ‘gH14’، ‘gH55’، ‘H114’ و ‘H163’ و در مورد صفت رنگ گوشت، هیبرید ‘gH55’ برترین هیبریدها شناخته شدند. در نهایت، با توجه به نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش، سه هیبرید ‘gH55’، ‘gH57’ و ‘H163’ به‌عنوان هیبریدهای متتخب معرفی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of Promising Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Hybrids with Emphasis on Fruit Quality Traits and Shelf Life

نویسندگان English

Z. Ghiasi Limanjoobi 1
M. Lotfi 1
H. Ramshini 2
S. Sarikhani 1
1 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Agricultural College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences , Agricultural College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), belonging to the Solanaceae family with a chromosome number of 2n=2x=24, is recognized as the second most cultivated vegetable worldwide after potatoes. Despite its global importance, a significant proportion of tomato seeds used in Iran are imported. To address this, a comprehensive breeding program has been undertaken, resulting in the development of over 1,500 inbred lines. The most promising lines have been selected for hybrid development. This study focuses on evaluating and comparing 26 selected hybrids out of a total of 180, intending to identify superior varieties in terms of yield and fruit quality. Gaining insights into the advantages of these superior hybrids can contribute to the development of varieties that better meet consumer demands while also promoting agricultural sustainability.
 
Material and Methods
This research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Station in Mohammadshahr, Karaj City, Alborz Province, involving the evaluation of 26 selected tomato hybrids from the Abouraihan Campus of Tehran University. The experiment was arranged as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with eight plants per plot. The hybrids were compared to three commercial cultivars—‘Matin’, ‘Brivio’, and ‘Bedero’—as well as an old hybrid, ‘H12’, used as a control. Seedlings were prepared in February 2024, with 32 seeds from each genotype sown into trays filled with a 1:1 mixture of peat moss and perlite. The spacing between rows was 2 meters, and the distance between two plants within a row was 50 centimeters. Throughout the trial, standard agronomic practices, including irrigation, fertilization, and pest management, were implemented. Evaluations encompassed both field and laboratory assessments, focusing on quantitative and qualitative traits. Over a single growing season, the hybrids were assessed for attributes such as fruit size, weight, color, and biochemical parameters including pH, total soluble solids (TSS), and titratable acidity. After the experiment, raw data were organized using Excel, followed by normality tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and mean comparisons via Duncan’s method in SAS software. Qualitative traits were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and principal component analysis was performed with R software.
 
Results and discussion
The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the hybrids across various traits. Key quantitative traits evaluated included fruit yield per plant, fruit weight, number of fruits, calyx stability, and ripening index. Results showed that hybrid ‘H114’ produced the highest number of fruits (83), while ‘gH74’ had the lowest (38). The average fruit weight ranged from 62 grams in ‘gH15’ to 136 grams in ‘gH47’. Calyx stability was notably higher in hybrids ‘gH54’ and ‘H95’, which is important for maintaining post-harvest quality. Regarding ripening, hybrids ‘H186’, ‘H165’, ‘H163’, and ‘H114’ were among the earliest to mature, requiring less than 95 days to reach harvest readiness. In terms of shelf life, hybrids ‘gH168’, ‘gH181’, and ‘gH54’ exhibited superior durability, lasting up to 13 days. The study also identified significant correlations among traits; for instance, a positive relationship between fruit firmness and overall yield suggested that denser fruits are often associated with higher productivity. Qualitative assessments, which included fruit firmness, shape uniformity, and taste, showed a wide variation in firmness levels, with commercial varieties ‘Brivio’ and ‘Bedero’ displaying the highest firmness. Additionally, meaningful correlations among traits—such as the positive relationship between the number of fruits and total yield—were observed. The discussion emphasizes the implications of these findings for breeding programs, highlighting the potential to select hybrids not only for higher yield but also for improved quality traits like flavor and shelf life.
 
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of hybrid selection for optimizing tomato production. The results revealed significant differences among the evaluated hybrids in several key quantitative and qualitative traits. Some hybrids demonstrated the potential to rival commercial varieties used as controls. To identify the superior hybrids, comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the measured traits were performed, with prioritization based on their relative importance. All traits were assessed simultaneously across all hybrids, with certain hybrids excelling in specific characteristics. Based on the overall findings, hybrids ‘H163’, ‘gH55’, and ‘gH57’ were identified as the top-performing options. Further research involving long-term field trials under diverse environmental conditions is recommended to enhance the adaptability and practical viability of these hybrids in agricultural production.
 
Acknowledgements: The authors gratefully acknowledge Zhinodaneh Company and the University of Tehran for their support.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hybrid variety
Plant breeding

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Al-Dairi, M., Pathare, P. B., & Al-Yahyai, R. (2021). Chemical and nutritional quality changes of tomato during postharvest transportation and storage. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 20(6), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.05.001
  2. Anisa, W. N., Afifah, E. N., & Murti, R. H. (2022). Selection of tomato breeding lines based on morphological traits associated with high yield potential in double-cross population. Biodiversitas, 23(6), 2973–2980. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230624
  3. Avdikos, I. D., Tagiakas, R., Tsouvaltzis, P., Mylonas, I., Xynias, I. N., & Mavromatis, A. G. (2021). Comparative evaluation of tomato hybrids and inbred lines for fruit quality traits. Agronomy, 11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030609
  4. Bai, Y., & Lindhout, P. (2007). Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future? In Annals of Botany (Vol. 100, Issue 5, pp. 1085–1094). https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm150
  5. Breksa, A. P., Robertson, L. D., Labate, J. A., King, B. A., & King, D. E. (2015). Physicochemical and morphological analysis of ten tomato varieties identifies quality traits more readily manipulated through breeding and traditional selection methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 42(6), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.02.011
  6. Chaudary, Yadav, S. K., Shivaraj, S. M., & Sonah, H. (2019). Mutation Breeding in Tomato: Advances, Applicability and Challenges . Plants8(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8050128
  7. Chauhan, A., Sharma, D., Kumar, R., & Shiwani, K. (2021). Methods of propagation in vegetable crops. Recent Trends in Propagation of Forest and Horticultural Crops, October, 270–281. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355393673
  8. Colombo, N., & Galmarini, C. R. (2017). The use of genetic, manual and chemical methods to control pollination in vegetable hybrid seed production: A review. Plant Breeding, 136(3), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12473
  9. Del Medico, A. P., Cabodevila, V. G., Vitelleschi, M. S., & Pratta, G. R. (2019). Multivariate estimate of heritability for quality traits in tomatoes by the multiple factor analysis. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 54, 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00064
  10. Ehdaei, B. (2012). Plant Breeding. University of Tehran Publications, Tehran, Iran .471 p. (in Persian).
  11. FAO. 2022. FAOSTAT production crops. https://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor.
  12. Figàs, M. R., Prohens, J., Casanova, C., Fernández-de-Córdova, P., & Soler, S. (2018). Variation of morphological descriptors for the evaluation of tomato germplasm and their stability across different growing conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 238, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.039
  13. Garuba, T., Mustapha, O. T., & Oyeyiola, G. P. (2018). Shelf life and proximate composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruits as influenced by storage methods. Ceylon Journal of Science, 47(4), 387. https://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v47i4.7557
  14. Henareh M, Dursun A and Abdoullahi Mandoulakani B (2015) Genetic diversity in tomato landraces collected from Turkey and Iran revealed by morphological characters. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus, 14(2): 87-96. https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/asphc/article/view/2560.
  15. Iqbal, R. K., Saeed, K., Khan, A., Noreen, I., & Bashir, R. (2019). Tomato (Lycopersicum Esculentum) Fruit Improvement through Breeding. Inno Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 2(7), 7–21. https://innovationinfo.org/articles/SJASR/SJASR-1-243.pdf
  16. Kerketta, A., & Bahadur, V. (2019). Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Yield and Yield Contributing Characters in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.) Genotypes. Plant Archives, 7(3), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n3p148
  17. Kumar, R., Paul, V., Pandey, R., Sahoo, R. N., Gupta, V. K., Asrey, R., & Jha, S. K. (2022). Reflectance based non-destructive assessment of tomato fruit firmness. Plant Physiology Reports, 27(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-022-00678-5
  18. Mivehchi Langaroudi, H. (2000). Comparison of yield and quality of 15 tomato cultivars in Bushehr province. Seed and Plant Journal, 16(3), 386–389.(in Persian with English abstract)
  19. Mostert, S. (2023). Optimise 2 , 4-D applications and investigate alternatives for calyx retention. Plant Breeding 25(3). https://doi.org/10.5987/0974-4517.2023.00740.3 .
  20. Patta, S., Vari, A. K., Tomar, B. S., & Singh, B. (2015). Standardization of seed production technology in hybrid tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) . Applied Biological Research, 17(3), 280. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4517.2015.00040.3
  21. Prohens-Tomás, J., & Nuez, F. (2007). Vegetables II: Fabaceae, Liliaceae, Solanaceae, and Umbelliferae (J. Prohens (ed.); Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
  22. Prudent, M., Causse, M., Génard, M., Tripodi, P., Grandillo, S., & Bertin, N. (2009). Genetic and physiological analysis of tomato fruit weight and composition: Influence of carbon availability on QTL detection. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(3), 923–937. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern338
  23. Reddy, B. R., Reddy, D. S., Reddaiah, K., & Sunil, N. (2013). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2(9), 238–244. http://www.chemijournal.com
  24. Saeedi, M., Mirdehghan, S. H., Koushesh Saba, M., & Nazoori, F. (2025). Strategies to preserve quality and improve storage life of fresh in-hull pistachio: a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 230, 113751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113751
  25. Saleem, M. Y., Asghar, M., Haq, M. A., Rafique, T., Kamran, A., & Khan, A. A. (2009). Genetic analysis to identify suitable parents for hybrid seed production in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(3), 1107–1116.http://www.plantarchives.org/PDF%2019-1/559-564%20(4842).pdf
  26. Thole, V., Vain, P., Yang, R. Y., Almeida Barros da Silva, J., Enfissi, E. M. A., Nogueira, M., Price, E. J., Alseekh, S., Fernie, A. R., Fraser, P. D., Hanson, P., & Martin, C. (2020). Analysis of Tomato Post-Harvest Properties: Fruit Color, Shelf Life, and Fungal Susceptibility. Current Protocols in Plant Biology, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/cppb.20108
  27. Yang, J., Liu, Y., Liang, B., Yang, Q., Li, X., Chen, J., Li, H., Lyu, Y., & Lin, T. (2023). Genomic basis of selective breeding from the closest wild relative of large-fruited tomato. Horticulture Research, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad142
  28. Yesmin, L., Islam, M., Rahman, M., Uddin, M., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Inbred and hybrid seed production potentiality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genotypes and their yield performance during summer. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 39(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i1.20057
  29. Zhou, M., Deng, L., Yuan, G., Zhao, W., Ma, M., Sun, C., Du, M., Li, C., & Li, C. (2023). Rapid generation of a tomato male sterility system and its feasible application in hybrid seed production. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 136(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04428-5

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 07 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 08 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 08 شهریور 1404