با همکاری انجمن علمی منظر ایران

عملکرد و کیفیت پرتقال ’ناولینا‘ (Citrus sinensis cv. Navelina) روی پایه‌های مختلف

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران

چکیده
استان مازندران، 70 درصد کل پرتقال کشور را تولید می­کند. برای تداوم تولید پایدار، استفاده از ارقام و پایه‌های متنوع و بررسی آن‌ها در شرایط منطقه ضروری است. ازاین­رو، تأثیر سه پایه سه‌برگچه‌ای مرکبات بر رشد رویشی و عملکرد کمّی و کیفی پرتقال رقم ’ناولینا‘ (Citrus sinensis cv. ’Navelina‘) طی هفت سال از زمان کاشت (1392) بررسی شد. در سال هفتم، پایه ’کاریزو سیترنج‘ (’Carrizo citrange‘)، بیشترین (765/0) و پایه ’سوینگل سیتروملو‘ (’Swingle citrumelo‘) کمترین (655/0) سازگاری ریخت‌شناختی را با رقم ’ناولینا‘ نشان دادند. حجم متوسط درختان در سال هفتم از حداقل 48/4 مترمکعب روی پایه ’سوینگل سیتروملو‘ تا حداکثر 24/5 مترمکعب روی پایه ’سیترنج C-35‘ (’C-35 citrange‘) متغیر بود. سه اصله از درختان روی پایه ’سیترنج C-35‘در سال‌های پنجم و ششم، علائم کلروز شدید و ریزش برگ نشان دادند که دو اصله با مدیریت تغذیه و آبیاری دوباره به حالت طبیعی برگشتند، ولی یک اصله به‌طور کامل زوال یافت. با اندازه‌گیری برخی از ویژگی‌های میوه در نیمه آبان سال‌های چهارم تا هفتم، متوسط اندازه میوه 282 گرم، متوسط ضخامت پوست 4/4 میلی‌متر، نسبت طول به عرض میوه 011/1، مقدار پوست به وزن میوه 4/46 درصد، مقدار آب میوه به وزن میوه 2/41 درصد و شاخص برداشت از حداقل 84/8 روی پایه ’سوینگل سیتروملو‘ تا حداکثر 74/10 روی پایه ’کاریزو سیترنج‘ متغیر بود. بالاترین متوسط عملکرد چهار سال (61/16 تن در هکتار) و بالاترین کارآیی عملکرد متوسط و سال پایانی (به‌ترتیب 07/6 و 77/7 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب) روی پایه ’کاریزو سیترنج‘ ثبت شد. با توجه به نتایج، شروع برداشت پرتقال ’ناولینا‘ روی پایه‌های ’کاریزو سیترنج‘ و ’سیترنج C-35‘ از ابتدای آبان ماه (دو هفته زودتر از پرتقال ’تامسون ناول‘، رقم غالب منطقه) و روی پایه ’سوینگل سیتروملو‘، 20-15 آبان (هم‌زمان با پرتقال ’تامسون ناول‘) می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Yield and quality of Navelina sweet orange (Citrus sinensis cv. Navelina) on different citrus rootstocks in the north of Iran

نویسندگان English

N. Akhlaghi Amiri 1
A. Asadi Kangarshahi 2
1 - Horticulture Crops Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran
2 Soil and Water Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Citrus industry in Iran with 288 thousand hectares cultivated area, 5.5 million tons annual production and 20 tons per hectare Iran ranks sixth, seventh and fifth in the world, respectively. About 70% of orange production in Mazandaran province, the most important region for citrus production in Iran, is dedicated to the ‘Thomson navel’ variety and sour orange rootstock. So, it is very important to evaluate new varieties and suitable rootstocks to replace them, if necessary. In the present study, the effects of three trifoliate citrus rootstocks on vegetative growth, quantitative and qualitative yield of early maturing ‘Navelina’ orange was studied over a seven-year period in Mazandaran province in the North of Iran.
 
Materials and Methods
Research was performed in a complete randomized block design with ‘Navelina’ orange and three rootstocks (‘Carrizo citrange’; ‘Swingle citrumelo’ and ‘C-35 citrange’) with six replications and with 5 × 3 m planting distances during 2011 -2020. After planting in the main land, the young trees were trained for four years and then pruned annually in winter. Plant responses was included tree canopy volume, rootstock and scion morphological compatibility (affinity), fruit yield, yield efficiency, fruit characteristics in different time and on different rootstocks, appropriate time to start harvesting, and the theoretical space requirements of the trees for better land utilization.
 
Results and Discussion
Three trees on ‘C-35 citrange’ rootstock showed severe leaf chlorosis and leaf abscission in 2018 and 2019, but with nutrition and irrigation management, two of them returned to normal condition and one of them was completely declined. In the final year (2020), ‘Carrizo citrange’ rootstock showed the highest (0.765) and ‘Swingle citrumelo’ the lowest (0.655) morphological compatibility with ‘Navelina’ orange. The average tree canopy volume in 2020 ranged from a minimum of 4.48 m3 on ‘Swingle citrumelo’ to a maximum of 5.24 m3 on ‘C-35 citrange’ rootstock. So, the volume of Navolina orange trees on all three rootstocks were small. In early November of 2017-2020 some characteristics of fruits were evaluated. Results showed that ‘Navelina’ orange had elongated fruits (the ratio of fruit length to fruit width was higher than one), with a large size and weight (more than 280 grams), thick peel (about 4.4 mm), peel weight to the fruit weight was more than 46%, the juice content to fruit weight was more than 41%, and fruits in this time had a pale orange peel color. Average of harvest index in early November ranged from a minimum of 8.84 in ‘Swingle citrumelo’ to a maximum of 10.74 in ‘Carrizo citrange’ rootstock. ‘Carrizo citrange’ rootstock had the highest average four-year yield (16.61 ton.ha-1) and the highest average and final-year yield efficiency (6.07 and 7.77 kg.m-3, respectively). In the present study, of the seven-year field trials after planting on the main land, based on tree height and crown diameter and considering 2.5 m of space between rows of trees, the theoretical space required for each tree was about 7.5 m2. Therefore, the number of trees can be increased to 1000 trees per hectare to make better use of the land in this region
 
Conclusion
Harvest time of ‘Navelina’ orange on ‘Carrizo’ and ‘C-35 citrange’ rootstocks begin in the third decade of October and on ‘Swingle citrumelo’ rootstock, starts at the first decade of November, at the same time as harvesting ‘Thomson navel’ orange (the common variety in the region). Due to the early discoloration of the fruit peel and the contamination of the region with the Mediterranean citrus fly, delay in harvesting causes high crop losses and pre-harvest fruit drop due to the bites of this insect pest. As well as, delay in harvest reasons the fruit to become larger and heavier, which reduces fruits marketability. Of the three rootstocks studied in this research, ‘Carrizo citrange’ was the best rootstock for ‘Navelina’ orange variety. In addition to showing no signs of decline, it had the highest average yield of four years and the highest average yield efficiency and final year. Also, the fruit harvest index reached the standard harvest level in late October, which is two weeks earlier than the common variety in the region.
 
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the experts and colleagues of the Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center who sincerely cooperated in the field and laboratory work of this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Graft compatibility
Decline
Harvest time
Intensive planting
Trifoliate rootstocks

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Agricultural Statistics. (2022). Third volume: Horticultural and greenhouse products, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Planning and Economic Deputy of Information and Communications Technology Center, 328 p. (In Persion)
  2. Akhlaghi Amiri, N., & Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2024). Investigating vegetative growth, yield and harvest time of Fukumoto orange (Citrus sinensis Fukumoto) with some citrus rootstocks Iran. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 25(4), 501-518. (In Persian)
  3. Akhlaghi Amiri, N., & Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2020). Pruning of Citrus Trees. Agricultural Extension and Education Publications, Tehran, Iran. 128 p. (In Persian)
  4. Akhlaghi Amiri, N., & Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2022a). Effect of ‘C-35 citrange’ rootstock on vegetative and reproductive characteristics of Miyagawa Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu ‘Miyagawa’) in the plain and foothills of East Mazandaran. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 23(1), 79-88. (In Persian)
  5. Akhlaghi Amiri, N., & Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2022b). Vegetative and reproductive characteristics of Miyagawa Satsuma mandarin on ‘Swingle citrumelo’ in alluvial and piedmont-plain of East Mazandaran. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 53(1), 1-14. (In Persian). http://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2021.308459.1836
  6. Akhlaghi Amiri, N., Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Fattahi Moghadam, J. (2023). Investigating the vegetative growth, quantitative and qualitative yield and harvesting time of ‘Thomson navel’ orange with different rootstocks in east of Mazandaran. Journal of Research in Hortural Science, 2(2), 209-226. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22092/rhsj.2024.362581.1063
  7. Asadi Kangarshahi, A. (2019). Nutrition Management of Citrus Trees. Agricultural Extension and Education Publications, Tehran, Iran. 174 p. (In Persian)
  8. Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Akhlaghi Amiri, N. (2003). Citrus dieback and decline in east of Mazandaran. Agricultural Jihad Organization of Mazandaran Province. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). 92/217/01.
  9. Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Akhlaghi Amiri, N. (2018). Establishment of Sustainable Citrus Orchard. Agricultural Extension and Education Publications, Tehran, Iran. 180 p. (In Persian)
  10. Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Akhlaghi Amiri, N. (2020). Evaluation of growth rate and vegetative and physiological characteristics of satsuma mandarin on ‘C-35’ rootstock in some calcareous soils. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 34(2), 215-234. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/ijsr.2020.122521
  11. Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Akhlaghi Amiri, N. (2022). Evaluation of vegetative, physiological, and chlorosis characteristics of Satsuma mandarin on ‘Carrizo citrange’ rootstock in some calcareous soils. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 36(1), 47-67. (In Persian). https//doi.org/10.22092/IJSR.2022.126890
  12. Asadi Kangarshahi, A., & Akhlaghi Amiri, N. (2023). Performance of Miyagawa Satsuma Mandarin raised on ‘Swingle citrumelo’ in calcareous soils. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 10(3), 161-172. https//doi.org/10.22059/IJHST.2022.326739.480
  13. Aviles, T. C., Filho, F. A., Stuchi, E.S., Silva, S. R., & Espinoza, E. (2011). Horticultural performance of Folha Murcha sweet orange on to twelve rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(2), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.039
  14. Bassal, M. A. (2009). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Marisol’ Clementine grown on four rootstocks in Egypt. Scientia Horticulturae, 119, 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.020
  15. Caruso, M., Giuffrida, A., & Malfa, S. L. (2024). Rootstocks for the Mediterranean citrus industry: Current choices and new releases. Italus Hortus, 31(1), 1-17. http://10.26353/j.itahort/2024.1.0117
  16. Castle, W. S. (1987). Citrus Rootstocks. In: R. C. Rom and R. F. Carlson (Ed.) Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. John Wiley & Sons Inc. p. 361-399
  17. Cruz, M. A., Neves, C. S. V., Carvalho, D. U., Colombo, R. C., Junior, R. P., & Tazima, Z. H. (2019). Navelina sweet orange trees on five rootstocks in Northern Parana state. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 41(3), 1-9. https://dx.doi.org /10.1590/0100-29452019006
  18. Girardi, E. A., Sola, J. G. P., Scapin, M. S., Moreira, A. S., Bassanezi, R. B., Ayres, A. J., & Pena, L. (2021). The perfect match: Adjusting high tree density to rootstock vigor for improving cropping and land use efficiency of sweet orange. MDPI, Agronomy, 11, 2569, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122569
  19. Gullo, G., Dattola, A., Vonella, V., & Zappia, R. (2021). Performance of the Brasiliano 92 orange cultivar with six trifoliate rootstocks. Agriculture and Food, 6(1), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2021013
  20. Habibi, F., Liu, , Folta, K., & Sarkhosh, A. (2022). Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees. Horticulture Research, 9, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac032
  21. Hayat, F., Li, J., Iqal, Sh., Peng, Y., Hong, L., Balal, R. M., Nawaz Khan, M., Khan, U., Farhan, M. A., Li, C., Song, W., Tu, P., & Chen, J. (2022). A mini review of citrus rootstocks and their role in high-density orchards. Plants, 11(2876), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212876
  22. Lado, J., Gambetta, G., & Zacarias, L. (2018). Key determinants of citrus fruit quality: Metabolites and main changes during maturation. Scientia Horticulturae, 233, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.055
  23. Lee, A. T. C., Joubert, J., & Vuuren, S. P. V. (2009). Rootstock choice. In: J. Joubert and S. P. Van Vuuren (Ed.) Integrated Production Guidelines for Export Citrus. Citrus Research International, 1(6), 1-28.
  24. Louzada, E. S., Rio, H. S., Setamou, M., Watson, J. W., & Swietlik, D. M. (2008). Evaluation of citrus rootstocks for the high pH, calcareous soils of South Texas. Euphytica, 164, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9701-x
  25. Manzoor, M., Hussain, S. B., Anjum, M. A., Naseer, M., Ahmad, R., & Ziogas, V. (2023). Effects of harvest time on the fruit quality of Kinnow and Feutrell’s Early Mandarins (Citrus reticulata Blanco). MDPI Agronomy, 13(3), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030802
  26. MMGO (2020). Mazandaran Meterology General Oficce. (In Persian). from http://www.mazmet.ir
  27. Morales, J., Bermejo, A., Navarro, P., Quinones, A., & Salvador, A. (2021). Effect of Rootstock on Citrus Fruit Quality: A Review. Food Reviews International, 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1978093
  28. Sahin Cevik, M., & Moore, G. A. (2006). Identification and expression analysis of cold-regulated genes from the cold-hardy citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata (L.). Plant Molecular Biology, 62, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-006-9005-2
  29. Singh, A., Naqvi, S., & Singh, S. (2002). Citrus Germplasm Cultivar and Rootstocks. National Research Centre of Citrus, Kalyani Publication, New Delhi, India. 166 p.
  30. Skewes, M. (2015). Navelina orange rootstock incompatibility. South Australian Research and Development Institute, Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1577.9288
  31. Stuchi, E. S., Martins, A. B. G., Lemo, R. R., & Aviles, T. C. (2009). Fruit quality of Tahiti lime (Citrus latifolia Tanaka) grafted on 12 different rootstocks. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 31(2), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452009000200020
  32. Tazima, Z. H., Neves, C. S. V. J., Yada, I. F. U., & Junior, R. P. L. (2013). Performance of ‘Okitsu’ Satsuma Mandarin on nine rootstocks. Scientia Agricola, 70(6), 422-427. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000600007
  33. Ziogas, V., Kokkinos, E., Karagiaai, A., Ntamposi, E., Voulgarakis, A. S., & Hussain, B. (2023). Effect of rootstock selection on tree growth, yield, and fruit quality of lemon varieties cultivated in Greece. MDPI, Agronomy, 13, 2265, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092265

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 23 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 23 شهریور 1404