واکنش چهار رقم گوجه‎فرنگی پاییزه به تاریخ‌های متفاوت انتقال نشاء در استان بوشهر

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان بوشهر

2 دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

چکیده

به‎منظور تعیین مناسب‎ترین تاریخ انتقال نشاء و رقم گوجه‎فرنگی، آزمایشی به مدت دو سال در ایستگاه تحقیقات برازجان در سال‎های زراعی 89-1388 و 90-1389 به‎صورت اسپلیت پلات در قالب طرح بلوک‎های کامل تصادفی با تیمارهای تاریخ انتقال نشاء در چهار سطح (15 شهریور، 5 مهر، 25 مهر و 15 آبان) در کرت اصلی و تیمار رقم در چهار سطح شامل ارقام پتوپراید‎2، پتوارلی سی اچ، کالجی‎N3 و کیمیا در کرت فرعی درچهار تکرار اجرا شد. صفات مورد بررسی شامل عملکرد کل، تعداد میوه در بوته، وزن میوه، عملکرد تک بوته، طول و قطر میوه، اسیدیته و درصد مواد جامد محلول بودند. پس از برداشت میوه در هر چین، صفات عملکرد میوه، تعـداد میـوه در بوتــه، وزن میــوه، عملکــرد تــک بوتــه اندازه‌گیری شد. برای تعیـین طـول و قطـر میـوه، اسـیدیته و مـواد جامد محلول از هر کرت آزمایش، 10 میـوه به‌طور تـصادفی انتخـاب شد. نتایج حاصل از آزمایش نشان داد که اثر متقابل تاریخ انتقال نشاء با رقم بر صفات عملکرد میوه، عملکرد تک بوته، تعداد میوه در بوته، وزن میوه و قطر میوه در سطح یک درصد معنی دار بود. اثر سال بر عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد معنی‎دار بود. در سال اول بیشترین مقدار عملکرد کل و عملکرد تک بوته ازتاریخ کاشت 15 شهریور و رقم پتوپراید­2 و کمترین عملکرد از تاریخ کاشت آخر (15 آبان) و رقم کیمیا به دست آمد. در سال دوم بیشترین مقدار عملکرد کل و تک بوته از تاریخ کاشت دوم (5 مهر) و رقم کیمیا و کمترین مقدار از تاریخ کاشت 15 آبان و رقم پتو­ارلی سی اچ به‎دست آمد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Response of Four Fall Tomato Cultivars to Various Transplanting Dates in Bushehr Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahram Behzadi 1
  • Ali Rahemi Karizaki 2
1 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Bushehr
2 Gonbad Kavous
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Tomato is a major source of the antioxidant, lycopene, which has been linked to many health benefits, including reduced risk of heart disease and cancer. It is also a great source of vitamin C, potassium, folate and vitamin K. Optimal planting dates and appropriate cultivars are farm management cases that are effective in increasing yield. The purpose of the planting date is to find the planting time of a cultivar or a group of similar varieties of a plant so that the set of environmental factors at that time would be appropriate for the emergence, establishment and survival of the seedlings. Because of off-season production, tomato has a high economic status in Bushehr Province. Some researchers reported that cultivars with larger fruits had the lowest number of fruits per plant. By investigating the response of tomatoes to time of transplantation, fruit yield and crop characteristics of the cultivars, a number of researchers reported that the date of transplantation had a significant effect on the number of days to flowering, the number of branches per plant, the diameter of the fruit, the number of fruits per Plant and fruit yield, early transfer of seedlings increased the harvest period, while late planting date was significantly effective on flowering, and the plants sooner went to flower.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in order to determine the best transplanting date and tomato cultivars. An experiment was carried out in Randomized Completely Block Design with four levels of transplanting dates (6 Sep, 27 Sep, 17 Oct and 6 Nov) in main plots and four cultivars (Petopride 2, Peto Early CH, Cal J-N3 and Kimia) in sub plots with four replications in Bushehr Agricultural and Natural research resource center during 2009-2011.The spacing between rows of planting was 140 cm and plant spacing was 50 cm. Each plot included 4 planting lines of 4 meters long. Before planting in the summer, land preparation was done between June and August. The amount of fertilizer was determined based on soil test results. Phosphorus fertilizers, potassium, micronutrient and one third of nitrogen fertilizers and iron sequestrons, along with decayed animal manure, were mixed prior to deployment of type tubes and mixed with soil. One third of nitrogen fertilizers and iron sequestrons were given during flowering and one-third remained at the time of fruit start. Irrigation was carried out on a regular basis, taking into account the weather conditions and plant requirements. After each harvest, fruit yield, fruit number per plant, fruit weight, yield per plant were measured. To determine the length and diameter of fruit, acidity and soluble solids from each plot, 10 fruits were selected randomly.
Results and Discussion: Interaction effect among the tomato cultivars and transplanting dates on fruit yield, yield per plant, number of fruits per plant, fruit weight and fruit diameter were significant at 1% probability level. In the first year, the highest total yield and fruit yield per plant were obtained from the transplanting date of 6 September and Potoperide 2 cultivar, and the lowest yield was produced with November 15 transplanting date and Kimia cultivar. In the second year, the highest total yield and fruit yield per plant were obtained from the transplanting date of 27 September and kimia cultivar, and the lowest amount was obtained from the transplanting date of 6 November and Peto Early CH cultivar. Planting date is one of the most important management practices which affects the crop growth through the effect on photoperiod, day and night temperature, light intensity and soil moisture. In most cases, earlier planting dates due to the longer vegetative and reproductive growth period of the plant may improve the allocation of photosynthetic materials to the plants.
Conclusions: This study showed that fruit yield and yield components were significantly affected by planting date and cultivars. Generally, delay in planting reduces fruit yield, plant yield, fruit weight and number of fruits per plant. Environmental factors such as light, temperature, CO2, moisture content can be changed from year to year. These factors affect the number of flowers formed in the plant, their pollination, the percentage of fruit formation. Also, the potential of cultivars had a significant effect on yield and its components and the cultivars producing the shorter fruit had the least number of fruits per plant.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Borazjan
  • cultivars
  • Tomato
  • Transplanting date
  • Fruit yield
1- Adelana B. O. 1975. Effect of stalking on growth and yield of tomatoes. East African Agricultural and Forestry, 41(3):243-249.
2- Asgedom S., Struik P. C., Heuvelink E. and Araia W. 2011. Opportunities and constraints of tomato production in Eritrea. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(4): 956-967.
3- Bhardwaj R.K., Mehta BS. and Kohli UK. 1995. Effect of planting time and spacing on some indeterminate tomato cultivars in mid hills. Annals of Agricultural Research, 16(3): 396-398.
4- Emami A. 2014. Effect of transplanting dates on fruit yield and related quality traits of tomato genotypes (Lycopersicun escutentum Mill.). International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review. 2(8): 1-9.
5- Gorjian G. 1989. Results of tomato researchs in Bushehr Province. Final Report Project, Record Number: 1017657 of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII). (In Persian with English abstract).
6- Hamma I. L., Ibrahim U. and Haruna M. 2012. Effect of planting date and spacing on the growth and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Samaru area of Zaria in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment. 8(1):63-66.
7- Hanareh M. and Hasani G. 2014. Effects of Transplanting Stage of Seedling and Planting Depth on Growth and Yield of Tomato cv. Petoearly CH.
8- Hossain M.F., Ara N., Islam M.R., Hossain J. and Akhter B. 2014. Effect of different sowing dates on yield of tomato genotypes. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology, 4(1), pp.40-43.
9- Islam Sh., Islam M.M., Abubakar Siddik., M., Afsana N., Rabin M.H., Delavar Hosein., M., Parvin S. 2017. Variation in Growth and Yield of Tomato at Different Transplanting Time. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(2):142-145.
10- Jamwal R.S., Parkash S., Thakur, D.R. and Parkash S. 1995. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) cultivars to planting date and spacing under alluvial sand deposits. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research. 21: (2) 27-31.
11- Khajehpour M. R. 2000. Principles and foundations of agronomy. Esfahan Industrial university Press. 386 p. (In Persian).
12- Khan A., Najeeb U., Wang L., Tan D. K. Y., Yang G., Munsif F., Ali S. and Hafeez A. 2017. Planting density and sowing date strongly influence growth and lint yield of cotton crops. Field Crops Research, 209, 129-135.
13- Madhumathi C. and Sadarunnisa S. 2013. Effect of different transplanting dates and varieties on fruit quality and seed yield of tomato. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 8(1), 8-11.
14- Maerere A.P., Sibuga K.P., Mwajombe K.K. 2006. Baseline survey report of tomato production in Mvomero district-Morogoro region, Tanzania, Sokoine University of Agriculture Faculty of Agriculture, Morogoro, pp 1-31.
15- Mamnooei E. 2005. Effect of planting density on yield and quality of tomato cultivars under plastic cover in Jiroft. Research reports for Agricultural Research Center of Jiroft and Kahnooj seed and plant parts. 24 pp. (In Persian).
16- Mazaheri Tehrani M., Mortazavi A., Ziaolhagh H. and Ghandi A. 2007. Qualitative characteristics in tomato processing, Knowledge frontier Press. 253 p. (In Persian).
17- Mivechi Langaroodi H. 1998.Study on yield and quality of 15 tomato lines and cultivars in Bushehr Province. Research reports for Agricultural Research Center of Boushehr seed and plant department. (In Persian).
18- Mousavi M. J. 1996. Investigation of the effect of cultivation and date of planting on physiological characteristics and yield of tomato in Mashhad area. Thesis of M Sc. Mashhad University (In Persian).
19- Naika S., J. Juede M., Goffau M. H. and Van Dam B. 2005. Cultivation of tomato Production, processing and marketing. In: B. Van Dam (ed.), Digigrafi, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
20- Peyvast Gh. 2007. Vegetable Production (4th ed). Daneshpazir Press. 506 pp. (In Persian).
21- Radzevičius A., Viškelis P. and Bobinas Č. 2008. Quality and physiological parameters of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits of Lithuanian selection. biologija, 54(2): 108-111.
22- Samnotra R.K., Gupta A.K., Jandial K.C. 1998. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) to different dates of transplanting. Environment and Ecology.16: 3, 740-741.
23- Sharma N.K. and Tiwari R.S. 1996. Effect of time of planting on yield and yield contributing characters of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cv. Pusa Ruby. Recent Horticulture3: 1, 82-85.
24- Singh A., Jain P. K., Sharma H. L. and Singh Y. 2015. Effect of planting date and integrated nutrient management on the production potential of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.) under polyhouse condition. Journal Crop and Weed, 11, 28-33.