اثر تنش خشکی بر متغیرهای جوانه‌زنی بذر و صفات فیزیولوژیکی گیاه ختمی زینتی (Alcea rosea L.)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه علوم باغبانی و فضای سبز، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

گل ختمی (Alcea rosea L.) یکی از گیاهان با ارزش زینتی می‌باشد که 36 گونه از آن در ایران کشت و کار می‌شود. با توجه به این مسئله که جوانه‌زنی بذور در طبیعت با تنش خشکی همراه است لذا میتوان با مطالعه­ی تغییرات فیزولوژیکی و آنتی اکسیدانی گامی مهم در راستای احیای رویشگاه‌های آن برداشت. بدین منظور آزمایشی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار در آزمایشگاه دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه فروسی مشهد اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل دو اکوتیپ مشهد و تهران با پنج سطح خشکی (صفر، 2-، 4-، 6- و 8- بار) بود. نتایج نشان داد که اثر اکوتیپ و سطوح خشکی بر تمام صفات اندازه‌گیری شده معنی‌دار بود. اکوتیپ مشهد دارای برتری معنی‌داری نسبت به اکوتیپ تهران بود و بذر آنها توانست در تیمارهای 6- و 8- بار به ترتیب 28 و 24 درصد جوانه بزند. میزان طول ریشه‌چه و ساقه‌چه و وزن اکوتیپ تهران با افزایش پتانسیل اسمزی نسبت به اکوتیپ مشهد بیشتر کاهش یافت. از طرفی فعالیت آنزیم‌های مورد بررسی نشان داد که در هر دو اکوتیپ فعالیت سوپراکسید دیسموتاز و پراکسیداز کاهش یافت اما فعالیت آنزیم کاتالاز با کاهش بیشتر پتانسیل اسمزی افزایش یافت. میزان پرولین و مالو‌ن‌دی‌آلدهید در اکوتیپ مشهد در تیمار 8- بار نسبت به شاهد به‌ترتیب 12 و 1/5 برابر شد. به نظر می‌رسد که اکوتیپ مشهد دارای بیشترین تحمل به خشکی را در مقایسه با اکوتیپ تهران در مرحله جوانه‌زنی دارد. از طرفی همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری بین فعالیت آنزیم سوپراکسید دیسموتاز و پراکسیداز با درصد جوانه‌زنی مشاهده شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Drought Stress on Seed Germination Variables and Physiological Traits of Ornamental Hollyhock (Alcea rosea L.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • T. Oraee
  • M. Shoor
  • A. Tehranifar
  • S.H. Nemati
Department of Horticultural Science and Landscape, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The Hollyhock (Alcea rosea) is a summer flowering biennial plant that is native to China and belongs to the Malvaceae family. It is one of the most valuable ornamental plants, whose 36 species are cultivated in Iran. It is an increasing garden escape, especially in urban areas, and is usually found at foot of walls, in ruderal areas, and in cracks of pavements and old walls. Also, it is sometimes seen on riverbanks (for instance on dikes of the river Maas), dumps or road- and railway banks. Alcea rosea has been used as an herbal plant in folk medicine for treatment of different diseases such as common cold and cough. This plant is antiphlogistic, astringent, demulcent, diuretic and expectorant. Drought is the most significant environmental stress in agriculture worldwide, and improving yield under drought is a major goal of plant breeding. Seed germination and early seedling growth are potentially the most critical stages for water stress. When subjected to drought stress, plant metabolism is interrupted or inhibited by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation, resulting in reduced germination, weaker root and shoot growth and even mortality. Plants have evolved oxygen-scavenging systems consisting of non-enzyme antioxidant metabolites, such as proline and various antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase.
Materials and Methods: In order to examine the effect of drought stress on germination indexes, various antioxidant enzyme changes and non-enzyme antioxidant metabolites in Alcea rosea, an experiment was conducted in complete randomized design with three replications. The drought stress treatment was conducted in five levels with osmotic pressures 0, -2, -4, -6, and -8 bar and with using PEG (Poly Ethylene Glycol 6000) on two ecotypes of Alcea rosea (ecotype 1= Mashhad and ecotype 2= Tehran). The seeds are at first sterilized with hypo chloride sodium for two minutes and then washed superficially three times with distilled water. 25 seeds were transferred to a glass petri dish with 10 cm diameter, and for the duration of the experiment, 5 ml solution with different levels was added to each petri dish. After 14 days at 25±1 ºC temperature, the number of geminated seeds in each day was counted and recorded. In the first part of the experiment, after the end of the germination period, the following growth parameters were measured: germination percentage, germination rate, root and shoot length, and the fresh weight of seedling. In the second part, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde content, lipid peroxidation in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and proline index were measured.
Results and Discussion: The ecotype, drought treatments and their interaction had significant effects on growth parameters (germination percentage, germination rate, radicle and plumule length, and seedling fresh weight), as well as physiological and biochemical parameters (SOD, POD, CAT, MDA and proline). The highest germination parameters were recorded at Mashhad ecotype. Germination percentage and germination rate were severely affected by drought. Maximum percentage of germination (36) was recorded at control group followed by 32.1 at -2 bar and -4 bar PEG treatments in ecotype 1. Germination percentage in two ecotypes further declined to 33% at -8 bar compared to the control treatment. In both ecotypes, plants had the highest germination rate in control media (zero osmotic potential) but germination rate decreased significantly by decreasing water potential. Germination rate of control seeds of ecotype 1 was 11.7, while that of ecotype 2 was 8. 3. Germination rate in two ecotypes further declined to 56% and 38 %, at -8 bar compared to the control treatment, respectively. Ecotype 2 displayed a significant reduction in radicle and plumule length compared to the ecotype 1. Generally, the radicle and plumule length decreased significantly in relation to the drought stress caused by PEG. Ecotype 2 in -8 bar PEG treatment had the highest (41 and 32%) decrease in radicle and plumule length compared to the control temperature. In two ecotypes (Mashhad and Tehran) of Alcea rosea, increasing PEG concentrations resulted in a decrease in fresh and dry weights. Water absorption is the first germination stage. Due to the probable resistance of the ecotype one, water absorption rate is higher, and as a result, the percentage and rate of germination have increased. Ecotype 1 exhibited higher leaf SOD activities in response to -2 bar compared to -8 bar, but the SOD activities in ecotype 2 showed a general increase trend with increases in the PEG concentration. Drought stress resulted in lower antioxidant enzyme activities (POD) in leaves of both ecotypes compared to that observed at the control treatment, but the activity of CAT increased with the increase of drought stress. In both ecotypes, exposure to -8 bar resulted in significantly higher leaf MDA activities. Plants exhibited higher proline in response to -8 bar treatment compared to the control. By increasing the PEG concentration from control to -8 bar, proline content increased about 90 percent. In this experiment, drought stress reduced the rate and germination percentage and delayed subsequent plant deployment. When plants are subjected to drought stress, their metabolism is interrupted or inhibited by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation, resulting in reduced germination, weaker root and shoot growth and even mortality. The recent experiment showed that the activity of two superoxide dismutase and peroxidase enzymes decreased with increasing drought stress, and the activity of the catalase enzyme increased; this is in agreement with the results reported by other studies. On one hand, the increase in the activity of the catalase enzyme indicates that it is perhaps the most important enzyme involved under drought condition, which increased over the course of 14 days. On the other hand, limiting the activity of enzymes and increasing the amount of proline showed that increasing the resistance to drought stress in the plant depends on the accumulation of contaminating substances such as proline.
Conclusion: Due to the higher resistance of the ecotype 1 and increase in water absorption, the percentage and rate of germination were increased. If water absorption is disturbed by the seed, the germination activity is slowly applied and the later growth of the roots will decrease the germination rate. Therefore, it seems that Mashhad ecotype with increase of catalase and proline has the highest drought tolerance compared to the other ecotype at germination stage. There was a significant correlation between germination percentage with SOD and POD.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Osmotic potential
  • ornamental Hollyhock
  • Germination percentage
  • Physiological and biochemical indexes
  1. Abdollahi J., Tafaroji S.H., Ebrahimi M., Ramshini H.A., Dehghani Tafti A.R., Mortazavian M., Eftekhari M., Dezfoulian A.H., and Bagheri A. 2012. Effect of drought stress on germination and seedling growth of Salvia African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 5719-5725.
  2. Abido W.A.E., and Zsombik L. 2018. Effect of water stress on germination of some Hungarian wheat landraces varieties. Acta Ecologica Sinica 38: 422-428.
  3. Achakzai A.K.K. 2014. Imbibition, germination and lipid mobilization response by sunflower subjected to salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany 46: 1995-2002.
  4. Agrawal R.L. 1991. Seed Technology. Oxford & IBH Publishing, 658p.
  5. Ahmed B., Roy C.D., Subramaniam S.A., Ganie D., Kwatra D., Dixon D., Anant A., Zarqar M.A., and Umar S. 2016. An ornamental plant targets epigenetic signaling to block cancer stem cell driven colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 37: 385-396.
  6. Akhavan Barmaki M., Azanivand H., Osare M.H., Jafari Y.A., and Tavili A. 2013. Evaluation of drought stress effects on germination indices of four genotypes grassland of Bromus tomentellus. Agricultural Water Management Journal 66: 167-177. (In Persian with English abstract)
  7. Akhavan Barmaki M., Hashemi M., Azarnivand H., Osare M.H., Jafari A.A., and Tavili A. 2013. Effect of drought stress on growth and germination characteristics of three genotype of Agropyron trichophorum. Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal 2: 9-14. (In Persian with English abstract)
  8. Alscher R., Heath A., Erturk N., and Heath L.S. 2002 Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 1331-1341.
  9. Bagheri H., Ghazi Khanloosani Y., Zangani E., Andelibi B., Azimi Moghadam M.R., and Jamshidi S. 2012. Seed germination indices and initial growth of safflower seedlings with different thousand kernel weights under drought stress. Agroecology Journal 8: 1-12. (In Persian with English abstract)
  10. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., and Teare I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
  11. Burt S.A., and Reinders R.D. 2003. Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157: H7. Letters in Applied Microbiology 36: 162-167.
  12. Chen K., and Arora R. 2011. Dynamics of the antioxidant system during seed osmopriming, post-priming germination, and seedling establishment in Spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Plant Science 180: 212-20.
  13. Chen Z., Wang Z., Yang Y., Li M., and Xu B. 2018. Abscisic acid and brassinolide combined application synergistically enhances drought tolerance and photosynthesis of tall fescue under water stress. Scientica Horticulturae 228: 1-9.
  14. Ebadi M.T., Azizi M., and Farzane A. 2011. Effect of drought stress on germination factors of four improved cultivars of german chamomile (Matricaria recutita ). Journal of Plant Product 18: 119-132. (In Persian with English abstract)
  15. Fabian A., Jager K., and Barnabas B. 2008. Effects of drought and combined drought and heat stress on germination ability and seminal root growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings. Journal of Acta Biologica 52: 157-159.
  16. Fathi A., and Barari Tari D. 2016. Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. International Journal of Life Sciences 10: 1-6.
  17. Gao J.M., Xiao Q., Ding L.P., Chen M.J., Yin L., Li J.Z., Zhou S., and He G. 2008. Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in Alternanthera philoxeroides and Oryza sativa subjected to drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation 56: 89-95.
  18. Ghodke P.H., Andhale P.S., Gijare U.M., Thangasamy A., Khade Y.P., Mahajan V., and Singh M. 2018. Physiological and biochemical responses in onion crop to drought stress. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 2054-2062.
  19. Giannopolitis C.N., and Ries S.K. 1977. Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant. Physiology 59: 309-314.
  20. Gill S.S., and Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48:909-930.
  21. Guo Q., Wang Y., Zhang H., Qu G., Wang T., Sun Q. and Liang D. 2017. Alleviation of adverse effects of drought stress on wheat seed germination using atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment. Scientific Reports 7: 1666-1680.
  22. Hasanuzzaman M., Anwar Hossain M., Teixeira daSilva J.A., and Fujita M. Plant Response and Tolerance to Abiotic Oxidative Stress: Antioxidant Defense Is a Key Factor. Crop Stress and its Management: Perspectives and Strategies, pp 261-315.
  23. Heath R.L., and Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 125: 189-198.
  24. Hussain L., Akash M.S.H., Tahir M., Rehman K., and Ahmed K.Z. 2014 Hepatoprotective effects of methanolic extract of Alcea rosea against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 9: 322-327.
  25. In, B.C., Motomura S., Inamoto K., Doi M., and Mori G. 2007. Multivariente analysis of relation between preharvest environmental factors, postharvest morphological and physiological factors and vase life of cut Asomi Red Roses. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 76: 66-72.
  26. 2014. In: R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
  27. Jajarmi V. 2009. Effect of water stress on germination indices in seven wheat cultivar. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology 49: 105-106.
  28. Khalid M.N., Iqbal H.F., Tahir A., and Ahmad A.N. 2001. Germination potential of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) under saline condition. Journal of Biological Science 4: 395-396.
  29. Kusvuran S., and Dasgan H.Y. 2017. Drought induced physiological and biochemical responses in Solanum lycopersicum genotypes differing to tolerance. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus Horticulture 16: 19-27.
  30. Li H., Li X., Zhang D., Liu H. and Guan K. 2013. Effects of drought stress on the seed germination and early seedling growth of the endemic desert plant Eremosparton songoricum (Fabaceae(. Excil Journal 12: 89-101.
  31. Lim T.K. 2014. Edible medicinal and nonmedicinal plants. Flowers 8: 292-299.
  32. Liu M., Li M., Liu K., and Sui N. 2015. Effects of drought stress on seed germination and seedling growth of different maize varieties. Journal of Agricultural of Science 7: 231-240.
  33. Luck H. 1974. Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. II, edited by J Bergmeyer and M Grabi, Academic Press, New York. Pp 885-890.
  34. Mantovani A., and Iglesias R.R. 2010. The effect of water stress on seed germination of three terrestrial bromeliads from restinga. Brazilian Journal of Botany 33: 201-205.
  35. Michel B.E., and Kaufman M.R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Physiology 51: 914-916.
  36. Noman A., Aqeel M., Deng J., Khalid N., Sanaullah T., and Shuilin H. 2017. Biotechnological advancements for improving floral attributes in ornamental plants. Frontiers in Plant Science8: 1-15.
  37. Pakravan M., and Ghahreman A. 2003: Some new combinations and synonyms in Alcea (Malvaceae) from Iran. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 104: 713-716.
  38. Penfield S. 2017. Seed dormancy and germination. Current Biology 27: 874-878.
  39. Şevik H., and Ertürk N. 2015. Effects of drought stress on germination in fourteen provenances of Pinus Brutia seeds in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 3: 294-299.
  40. Seyyednejad S.M., Koochak H., Darabpour E., and Motamedi H. 2010. A survey on Hibiscus rosa sinensis, Alcea rosea and Malva neglecta Wallr as antibacterial agents. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 3: 351-355.
  41. Seyyed-Sharifi R., and Seyyed-Sharifi R. 2009. The effects of polyethyleneglycol on germination and seedling growth of carthamus cultivars. Iranian Journal of Biology 21: 400-410. (In Persian with English abstract)
  42. Stefania Toscano S., Romana D., Tribulata A., and Patane C. 2017. Effect of drought stress on seed germination of ornamental sunflowers. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39:1-12.
  43. Sun Y.D., Du X.H., Zhang W.J., Sun L., and Li R. 2011. Seed germination and physiological characteristics of Amaranthus mangostanus under drought stress. Advanced Mater Research Switzerland 183: 1071–1074.
  44. Tajamolian M., Sodaei zadeh H., and Shamsaie M. 2017. Evaluation of the effects of drought stress of mother plants on some seed germination indices of Satureja hortensis. Desert Management 8: 27-35. (In Persian with English abstract)
  45. Wang W.B., Kim Y.H., Lee H.S., Kim K.Y., Deng X.P., and Kwak S.S. 2009. Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47: 570-577.
  46. Yamada M., Morishita H., Urano K., Shiozaki N., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K., and Yoshiba Y. 2005. Effects of free proline accumulation in petunias under drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 1975-1981.
  47. Yan D., Duermeyer L., Leoveanu C., and Nambara E. 2014. The functions of the endosperm during seed germination. Plant Cell Physiology 55: 1521-1533.
  48. Zamani Z., Amiri H., and Ismaili A. 20018. Effect of drought stress on germination characteristics of two populations of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenumsubsp.graceum L.). Nova Biologica Reperta 5: 183-191. (In Persian with English abstract)