با همکاری انجمن علمی منظر ایران

اثر عناصر ریزمغذی و کودهای حاوی NPK روی برخی صفات فیزیولوژیکی، کیفیت و عملکرد میوه گوجه‌فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum) تحت تنش شوری

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه ژنتیک و تولیدات گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده
تنش شوری یکی از موانع اصلی تولید گوجه‌فرنگی است. این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی تأثیر تغذیه تلفیقی با کودهای NPK و ریزمغذی‌ها بر بهبود شاخص‌های فیزیولوژیکی، عملکرد و کیفیت میوه گوجه‌فرنگی (Solanum lycopersicum) تحت تنش شوری، در سال ۱۴۰۲ در گلخانه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی انجام شد. این آزمایش به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا گردید و شامل چهار سطح شوری (شاهد، دو، چهار و هشت دسی‌زیمنس بر متر) و چهار تیمار کودی (شاهد، NPK، ریزمغذی و ترکیب NPK + ریزمغذی) بود. نتایج نشان داد که افزایش شوری موجب کاهش معنی‌دار تعداد میوه در بوته، وزن متوسط میوه، شاخص سبزینگی، محتوای لیکوپن و عملکرد گردید، به‌طوری‌ که عملکرد میوه در هر بوته در تیمار هشت دسی‌زیمنس بر متر شوری نسبت به شاهد 54 درصد کاهش یافت. در مقابل، کاربرد تیمارهای کودی و به‌ویژه ترکیب NPK + ریزمغذی، اثرات منفی شوری را تا حد زیادی جبران کرد و موجب افزایش چشمگیر صفات مورد بررسی گردید؛ به‌گونه‌ای که بیشترین تعداد میوه (8/26 عدد)، میانگین وزن میوه (5/123 گرم) و عملکرد بوته (25/3 کیلوگرم) در این تیمار به ‌دست‌ آمد. همچنین این تیمار بالاترین شاخص سبزینگی (5/39) و محتوای لیکوپن (2/15 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم) را ایجاد کرد. از نظر شاخص‌های فیزیولوژیکی نیز استفاده هم‌زمان NPK و ریزمغذی‌ها موجب کاهش پرولین و نشت الکترولیت و در عین حال افزایش فعالیت آنزیم‌های کاتالاز (5/30 واحد بر میلی‌گرم پروتئین) و پراکسیداز (نُه واحد بر میلی‌گرم پروتئین) شد که نشان‌دهنده تقویت سیستم آنتی‌اکسیدانی گیاه و افزایش مقاومت به شوری است. بنابراین، یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که تغذیه متعادل با کودهای ماکرو و ریزمغذی، یک راهکار مدیریتی پایدار برای افزایش مقاومت و بهبود عملکرد گوجه‌فرنگی در خاک‌های شور محسوب می‌شود. این رویکرد می‌تواند ضمن کاهش وابستگی به کودهای شیمیایی، به توسعه کشاورزی پایدار کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Micronutrient Elements and NPK-Containing Fertilizers on Some Physiological Traits, Quality, and Fruit Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under Salinity Stress

نویسندگان English

A. Tobeh
A. Tobeh
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most widely grown vegetable crops in the world and is of high nutritional and economic importance. However, tomato production is severely constrained by abiotic stresses, particularly salinity, which reduces water uptake, disrupts ionic balance, damages chlorophyll, and induces oxidative stress. Nutrient management has emerged as a promising approach. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are fundamental for growth and osmotic adjustment, while micronutrients such as iron, zinc, manganese, and boron act as cofactors for enzymes, participate in antioxidant defense, and contribute to reproductive success. This research aimed to investigate the effects of NPK and micronutrient fertilization, both individually and in combination, on tomato yield, quality, and physiological parameters under varying salinity levels, with the ultimate goal of providing sustainable solutions for tomato production in salt-affected areas.

Materials and Methods
The experiment was carried out in 2024 at the greenhouse of Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Iran. The experimental design was factorial, based on a randomized complete block with three replications. Treatments included four salinity levels (0, 2, 4, and 8 dS.m⁻¹) imposed by adding NaCl to irrigation water, and four fertilizer treatments: control (no fertilizer), NPK (200 kg N, 150 kg P, and 150 kg K.ha⁻¹), micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn, and B applied as foliar spray), and combined NPK + micronutrients (half NPK dose plus foliar micronutrients). NPK was applied partly as basal and partly as top dressing, while micronutrients were sprayed twice during vegetative growth and once after fruit setting. The measured traits included yield components (fruit number, average fruit weight, total yield per plant), physiological parameters (chlorophyll index by SPAD, proline content, electrolyte leakage), and biochemical traits (fruit lycopene and the activity of antioxidant enzymes catalase and peroxidase). Data were analyzed by ANOVA using SAS and SPSS, and mean comparisons were conducted with Duncan's multiple range test at the 5% level.

Results and Discussion
Salinity stress markedly reduced tomato performance. Yield per plant declined from 3.5 kg in the control to 1.6 kg under 8 dS.m⁻¹, representing a 54% reduction. Similarly, fruit number decreased from 28.5 to 16.8 and average fruit weight from 125.3 g to 94.8 g. These reductions were accompanied by decreases in chlorophyll index and lycopene content, confirming the negative impact of salinity on both growth and quality. Proline content and electrolyte leakage, indicators of stress, increased significantly with higher salinity. Fertilizer treatments substantially alleviated these effects. The combined NPK + micronutrient treatment consistently produced the best results. Under this treatment, yield reached 3.25 kg per plant, almost restoring yield levels under non-saline conditions. Lycopene content, which dropped to 7.6 mg.kg⁻¹ in the unfertilized control at 8 dS.m⁻¹, increased to 15.2 mg.kg⁻¹ with combined fertilization under non-saline conditions. Similarly, chlorophyll index (SPAD) was maintained at 39.5 in the combined treatment compared with 28.3 in stressed, unfertilized plants. Physiological responses also confirmed the benefits of fertilization. Proline accumulation, which reached 8.9 μmol.g⁻¹ fresh weight in stressed unfertilized plants, was significantly reduced in fertilized ones, reflecting less need for osmotic adjustment. Electrolyte leakage was minimized under combined fertilization, suggesting better membrane stability. Antioxidant defense was strongly enhanced: catalase activity reached 30.5 units.mg⁻¹ protein in plants treated with NPK + micronutrients, compared with 15.2 in the control. Peroxidase activity increased to 9 units.mg⁻¹ protein compared with only 6.5 in the control. These results confirm that micronutrients such as Fe, Mn, and Zn act as cofactors, improving enzyme activity and enabling plants to neutralize reactive oxygen species more efficiently. Overall, the findings show that while salinity causes severe reductions in yield and fruit quality, integrated nutrient management substantially mitigates these negative effects. The superiority of the combined treatment compared to either NPK or micronutrients alone highlights the importance of balanced nutrition. It also shows that micronutrients can reduce the reliance on high chemical fertilizer inputs, thus aligning with sustainable agriculture practices. These results are consistent with previous reports on the role of balanced fertilization in enhancing salt tolerance by improving chlorophyll biosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and osmotic regulation.

Conclusion
The findings confirm that the combined application of NPK and micronutrients effectively mitigates the adverse effects of salinity on tomato growth and yield by improving chlorophyll biosynthesis, lycopene accumulation, and antioxidant enzyme activity while reducing stress indicators such as proline and electrolyte leakage. This integrated fertilization strategy enhances yield stability, fruit quality, and plant resilience, offering a sustainable solution for tomato production in saline environments. Furthermore, it reduces dependence on high chemical fertilizer inputs, supporting environmentally friendly practices and long-term agricultural sustainability.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Catalase
Chlorophyll index
Lycopene
Peroxidase
Proline

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

 

1.       Ahanger, M. A., & Agarwal, R. M. (2017). Potassium up-regulates antioxidant metabolism and alleviates growth inhibition under water and osmotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Protoplasma, 254(4), 1471-1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-1037-0
2.       Ahmad, P., Ahanger, M. A., Alyemeni, M. N., Wijaya, L., & Alam, P. (2018). Exogenous application of nitric oxide modulates osmolyte metabolism, antioxidants, and expression of salt transport genes in tomato under salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 127, 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1132-x
3.       Ahmed, N., Abid, M., Rashid, A., Abou-Shanab, R., & Ahmad, F. (2014). Influence of boron nutrition on membrane leakage, chlorophyll content and gas exchange characteristics in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(14), 2302-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.912325
4.       Altaey, D. K., & Majid, Z. Z. (2018). The activity of antioxidants enzymes and NPK contents as affected by water qaulity, kinetin, bio and organic fertilization in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i3.123
5.       Al-Temimi, A., Al-Ghrairi, S., Al-Ghrairi, F., & Razaq, I. (2020). Effect of potassium and micronutrient fertilization on the activity of catalase and yield of wheat grown in saline conditions. DYSONA-Applied Science, 1(3), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.30493/das.2020.239977
6.       Ashraf, M., Shahzad, S. M., Imtiaz, M., Rizwan, M. S., Arif, M. S., & Kausar, R. (2018). Nitrogen nutrition and adaptation of glycophytes to saline environment: A review. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64(9), 1181-1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1419571
7.      Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
8.      El-Mogy, M. M., Garchery, C., & Stevens, R. (2018). Irrigation with salt water affects growth, yield, fruit quality, and nutrient content in tomato. HortScience, 53(7), 1007-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1473482
9.       FAO. (2021). The State of Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
10.    Gul, H., Arif, M., Husna, Y. K., & Sayyed, A. (2019). Effect of boron, manganese and iron on growth, biochemical constituents and ionic composition of cowpea grown under salinity. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 9(3), 1-12.
11.    Hadwan, M. H. (2018). Simple spectrophotometric assay for measuring catalase activity in biological tissues. BMC Biochemistry, 19, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12858-018-0097-5
12.    Hafez, E. M., Alsohim, A. S., Farig, M., Omara, A. E. D., Rashwan, E., & Kamara, M. M. (2019). Synergistic effect of biochar and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on alleviation of water deficit in rice plants under salt-affected soil. Agronomy, 9(12), 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120847
13.    Hänsch, R., & Mendel, R. R. (2009). Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006
14.    Hawkesford, M., Horst, W., Kichey, T., Lambers, H., Schjoerring, J., Skrumsager Møller, I., & White, P. (2012). Functions of macronutrients. In Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 135-189. Academic Press.
15.    Isayenkov, S. V., & Maathuis, F. J. M. (2019). Plant salinity stress: Many unanswered questions remain. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00080
16.    Izadi, Z., & Rezaei Nejad, A. (2020). Effect of different iron concentrations and staircaseiron regime on some morphological, biochemical and flowering characteristics of Calendula officinalis. Journal of Horticultural Science, 34(2), 349-360. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v34i2.82363
17.    Jafari, A., Rasoli, F., Behtash, F., Mosavi, S. B. M., Ferdowsi Qebchaq, P., & Asadi, M. (2024). Evaluation of different concentrations of Fe and Zn in nutrient solution on yield, biochemical, and nutrient content of spinach in soilless conditions. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 8(15), 183-200. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2023.2010676.1316
18.    Juarez-Maldonado, A., de-Alba-Romenus, K., Morales-Díaz, A. B., & Benavides-Mendoza, A. (2017). Macro-nutrient uptake dynamics in greenhouse tomato crop. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40(13), 1908-1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1270310
19.    Kakubari, S., Sakaida, K., Asano, M., Aramaki, Y., Ito, H., & Yasui, A. (2020). Determination of lycopene concentration in fresh tomatoes by spectrophotometry: A collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 103(6), 1619-1624. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa050
20.    Kaviani, B., & Negahdar, N. (2021). Effect of nano-iron chelate and cycocel on growth parameters of poinsettia. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 38(2), 281–301. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2021.72172.1086
21.    Latifikhah, E., Eshghi, S., Gharaghani, A., Tafazoli, E., & Razaghi, F. (2019). Effect of foliar application of Brassinosteroids on growth, yield and fruit quality of two strawberry cultivars under salt stress in soilless culture. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 50(3), 697-707. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.262213.1480
22.    Liu, T., Dong, X., Guo, K., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Sun, H. (2024). Effects of fertilizer types and application levels on phosphorus availability of saline soils and crops: A meta‐analysis. Land Degradation & Development, 35(13), 4068-4080. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5205
23.    Mallick, S., Das, R. C., Zakir, H. M., & Alam, M. S. (2021). Effect of zinc and boron application on lycopene and nutritional qualities of tomato. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 27, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2021/v27i330367
24.    Mansour, M. M. F., & Hassan, F. A. S. (2022). How salt stress-responsive proteins regulate plant adaptation to saline conditions. Plant Molecular Biology, 108(3), 175–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01232-x
25.    Marschner, H. (2012). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 3rd ed. pp. xv, 651. England: Academic Press, London.
26.    Mellat Broker. (2024). Tomato cultivated area in Iran year-by-year summary (Analytical Report). https://www.mellatbroker.ir/upload/files/reports/1709117082651.pdf
27.    Minazadeh, R., Karimi, R., & Mohammadparast, B. (2018). The effect of foliar nutrition of potassium sulfate on morpho-physiological indices of grapevine under salinity stress. Journal of Plant Biological Sciences, 10(3), 83-106. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22108/ijpb.2018.111936.1105
28.    Mirabi, E., Seifi, E., & Hokmabadi, H. (2024). Effects of salinity on antioxidant enzymes and some morphophysiological traits of two interspecies hybrid pistachio rootstocks. Journal of Plant Production Research, 31(1), 213-229. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2023.21976.3097
29.    Moallaye Mazraei, S., Khaleghi, E., & Enayatizamir, N. (2024). Evaluation of the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria and potassium nitrate on the growth characteristics and gas exchange of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) under drought stress. Journal of Plant Production Research, 32(3), 135–161. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2024.22647.3167
30.    Mohammad Nejad Ganji, S. M., Zarei, H., Khoshhal Sarmast, M., & Akbarpour, V. (2024). Evaluation of the combined use of auxin and nutrients for root stimulation in stem cuttings of Ligustrum lucidum. Journal of Plant Production Research, 31(2), 1-22. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/JOPP.2023.20769.2980
31.    Nateghi, S., Pirzad, A., & Darvishzadeh, R. (2015). Effect of Fe and Zn micro nutrients on yield and yield components of Pimpinella anisum L. Journal of Horticultural Science, 29(1), 37-46. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.48438
32.    Noormohammadi, Z., Ismailpour, B., Azarmi, R., Shiekhalipour, M., Chamani, E., & Shahbazi Yajlo, R. (2021). Effect of melatonin tretment on growth and physiologycal and biochemical characteristics of Stevia rebaudiana berton under salt stress conditions. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 5(9), 1-15. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2021.534020.1170
33.    Nouri, M., Dashti, F., & Bayat, F. (2015). Changes in vegetative growth indices and yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) in different sources and levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 1(1), 21-32. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2015.15357
34.  Panahandeh, J., Zare Far, M. S., Motallebi-Azar, A., Zare Nahandi, F., & Amani, M. (2024). Investigating the effect of salicylic acid on reduce salinity stress in tomatoes. Journal of Horticultural Science, 37(4), 931-948. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2023.79421.1206
35.    Perez-Labrada, F., López-Vargas, E. R., Ortega-Ortiz, H., Cadenas-Pliego, G., Benavides-Mendoza, A., & Juárez-Maldonado, A. (2019). Responses of tomato plants under saline stress to foliar application of copper nanoparticles. Plants, 8(6), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8060151.
36.    Plaxton, W. C., & Tran, H. T. (2011). Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants. Plant Physiology, 156(3), 1006-1015. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175281
37.    Rahman, A., Harker, T., Lewis, W., & Islam, K. R. (2023). Nano and chelated iron fertilization influences marketable yield, phytochemical properties, and antioxidant capacity of tomatoes. Plos One, 18(11), e0294033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294033
38.    Rasouli, F., Abedini, F., & Fakhreghazi, S. H. (2019). The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the physiological characteristics in pepper (Capsicum annum L.) under salinity stress. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 9(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcpp.9.2.125
39.    Safdar, H., Amin, A., Shafiq, Y., Ali, A., Yasin, R., Shoukat, A., & Sarwar, M. I. (2019). A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Natural Sciences, 17(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsnsj170119.06
40.    Schmidt, S. B., Jensen, P. E., & Husted, S. (2016). Manganese deficiency in plants: The impact on photosystem II. Trends in Plant Science, 21(7), 622-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.03.001
41.    Seifi, A., Ahmadi, A., & Poustini, K. (2023). The effect of thiamine and pyridoxine on yield and some physiological wheat traits under drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 54(1), 11-25. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2022.328186.654884
42.    Shigeto, J., & Tsutsumi, Y. (2016). Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytologist, 209(4), 1395–1402. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13738
43.    Shireen, F., Nawaz, M. A., Chen, C., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Z., Sohail, H., & Bie, Z. (2018). Boron: Functions and approaches to enhance its availability in plants for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(7), 1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071856
44.    Singh, S., Tripathi, D. K., Singh, S., Sharma, S., Dubey, N. K., Chauhan, D. K., & Vaculík, M. (2017). Toxicity of aluminium on various levels of plant cells and organism: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 137, 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.005
45.    Toupchi Khosrowshahi, Z., Salehi-Lisar, S. Y., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., & Motafakkerazad, R. (2019). Effect of polyamines on antioxidative responses of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under drought stress. Journal of Plant Production Research, 26(2), 157-171. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2019.14942.2337
46.    Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q., & Guo, S. (2013). The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(4), 7370-7390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14047370
47.    Weisany, W., Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Siosemardeh, A., & Badakhshan, H. (2014). Effects of zinc application on growth, absorption and distribution of mineral nutrients under salinity stress in soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(14), 2255-2269. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.920386
48.    Ziachehre, M., Tobeh, A., Hassanpanah, D., & Farzaneh, S. (2023). Influence of planting date and foliar application of antifreeze compounds on some morpho-physiological traits of potato cultivars in Ardabil region. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 7(14), 136-159. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2022.1971753.1245
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 40، شماره 3
پاییز 1405
صفحه 536-523

  • تاریخ دریافت 27 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 19 آذر 1404